Scholarly and managerial interest in corporate sustainability has increased significantly in the past two decades. However, the field is increasingly criticized for failing to effectively contribute to sustainable development and for its limited impact on managerial practice. We argue that this criticism arises due to a fundamental ambiguity around the nature of corporate sustainability. To address the lack of concept clarity, we conduct a systematic literature review and identify 33 definitions of corporate sustainability. Adopting the Aristotelian perspective on definitions, one that promotes reducing concepts to their essential attributes, we discern four components of corporate sustainability. These components offer a conceptual space of inquiry that, while being parsimonious, offers nuanced understanding of the dimensions along which definitions of corporate sustainability differ. We discuss implications for research and practice and outline several recommendations for how advancements in construct clarity may lead to a better scholarly understanding of corporate sustainability.
Accenture & UN Global Compact. (2013). UN Global Compact—Accenture CEO Study on Sustainability 2013.
2.
AtkinsonG. (2000). Measuring corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43, 235-252.
3.
BansalP. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 197-218.
4.
BansalP.BertelsS.EwartT.MacConnachieP.O’BrienJ. (2012). Bridging the research–practice gap. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 73-92.
5.
BansalP.DesJardineM. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12, 70-78.
6.
BansalP.RothK. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717-736.
7.
BansalP.SongH.-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 105-149.
8.
BarnettM. L.SalomonR. M. (2012). Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33, 1304-1320.
9.
BaumgartnerR. J.RauterR. (2017). Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 81-92.
10.
BennS.DunphyD.GriffithsA. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
BergJ. (1982). Aristotle’s theory of definition. In ATTI del Convegno Internazionale di Storia della Logica (pp. 19-30).
12.
BhattacharyaC.PolmanP. (2017, December8). Sustainability lessons from the front lines. MIT Sloan Management Review.
13.
BowenF.Aragon-CorreaJ. A. (2014). Greenwashing in corporate environmentalism research and practice: The importance of what we say and do. Organization & Environment, 27, 107-112.
14.
BuschT.LewandowskiS. (2017). Corporate carbon and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22, 745-759.
15.
ChatterjiA. K.DurandR.LevineD. I.TouboulS. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 1597-1614.
16.
CohenM. R.NagelE. (1934). An introduction to logic and scientific method. Washington, DC: Harcourt, Brace.
17.
DeanT. J.McMullenJ. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 50-76.
DyllickT.HockertsK. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 130-141.
20.
DyllickT.MuffK. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29, 156-174.
21.
EcclesR. G.IoannouI.SerafeimG. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60, 2835-2857.
22.
ElkingtonJ. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of twenty-first century business. Oxford, England: Capstone.
23.
ElkingtonJ. (2018, June25). 25 Years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review.
24.
FiggeF.HahnT. (2004). Sustainable value added—measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 48, 173-187.
25.
FlammerC. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61, 2549-2568.
26.
FunkK. (2003, January15). Sustainability and performance. MIT Sloan Management Review.
27.
GaoJ.BansalP. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 241-255.
28.
GondJ.-P.CraneA. (2010). Corporate social performance disoriented: Saving the lost paradigm?Business & Society, 49, 677-703.
HaffarM.SearcyC. (2018). Target-setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 1079-1092.
32.
HahnT.FiggeF. (2011). Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: Toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 325-345.
33.
HahnT.FiggeF.Aragón-CorreaJ. A.SharmaS. (2017). Advancing research on corporate sustainability off to pastures new or back to the roots?Business & Society, 56, 155-185.
34.
HahnT.PreussL.PinkseJ.FiggeF. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39, 463-487.
35.
HaighN.HoffmanA. J. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 126-134.
36.
HartS. L.MilsteinM. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 56-67.
37.
HeikkurinenP.MäkinenJ. (2018). Synthesising corporate responsibility on organisational and societal levels of analysis: An integrative perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 589-607.
38.
Howard-GrenvilleJ.BuckleS. J.HoskinsB. J.GeorgeG. (2014). Climate change and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 615-623.
39.
KimE.-H.LyonT. P. (2014). Greenwash vs. brownwash: Exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organization Science, 26, 705-723.
40.
KingA. A.LenoxM. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance: An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 105-116.
41.
KironD.UnruhG.ReevesM.KruschwitzN.RubelH.ZumFeldeA. M.2017. Corporate sustainability at a crossroads. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(4).
42.
LandrumN. E. (2018). Stages of corporate sustainability: Integrating the strong sustainability worldview. Organization & Environment, 31, 287-313.
43.
LandrumN. E.OhsowskiB. (2018). Identifying worldviews on corporate sustainability: A content analysis of corporate sustainability reports. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 128-151.
44.
LankoskiL. (2016). Alternative conceptions of sustainability in a business context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 847-857.
LozanoR. (2012). Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: An analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 14-26.
47.
MargolisJ. D.ElfenbeinH. A. (2008, January). Do well by doing good? Don’t count on it. Harvard Business Review.
48.
MarquisC.ToffelM. W.ZhouY. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27, 483-504.
49.
MarshallR. S.BrownD. (2003). The strategy of sustainability: A systems perspective on environmental initiatives. California Management Review, 46, 101-126.
50.
MilneM. J.GrayR. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 13-29.
51.
MontielI. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 21, 245-269.
52.
MontielI.Delgado-CeballosJ. (2014). Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet?Organization & Environment, 27, 113-139.
53.
MoriokaS. N.de CarvalhoM. M. (2016). A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 134-146.
54.
NeubaumD. O.ZahraS. A. (2006). Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management, 32, 108-131.
55.
OkoyeA. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary?Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 613-627.
56.
OrlitzkyM.SchmidtF. L.RynesS. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24, 403-441.
RussellS. V.HaighN.GriffithsA. (2007). Understanding corporate sustainability: Recognizing the impact of different governance systems. In BennS.DunphyD. (Eds.), Corporate governance and sustainability: Challenges for theory and practice (pp. 36-56). New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
SalzmannO.Ionescu-SomersA.StegerU. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: Literature review and research options. European Management Journal, 23, 27-36.
63.
SchalteggerS.BeckmannM.HansenE. G. (2013). Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability: Mapping the field. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 219-229.
64.
SchalteggerS.HansenE. G.Lüdeke-FreundF. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
65.
SchererA. G.PalazzoG. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 899-931.
66.
SharmaS. (2014). Competing for a sustainable world: Building capacity for sustainable innovation. New York, NY: Routledge.
67.
SteffenW.RichardsonK.RockströmJ.CornellS. E.FetzerI.BennettE. M.. . . SörlinS. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. doi:10.1126/science.1259855
68.
StegerU. (2004). The business of sustainability: Building industry cases for corporate sustainability. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
69.
StermanJ. (2015). Stumbling towards sustainability. In HendersonR. G. R.TushmanM. (Ed.), Leading sustainable change: An organizational perspective (pp. 50-80). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
70.
SteurerR.LangerM. E.KonradA.MartinuzziA. (2005). Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business–society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 263-281.
71.
SuddabyR. (2010). Editor’s comments: Construct clarity in theories of management and organization. Academy of Management Review, 35, 346-357.
72.
SzékelyF.KnirschM. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23, 628-647.
73.
United Nations. (1987). Our Common Future (Brundtland Report): World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
74.
UpwardA.JonesP. (2016). An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: Defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science. Organization & Environment, 29, 97-123.
Van der BylC. A.SlawinskiN. (2015). Embracing tensions in corporate sustainability: A review of research from win-wins and trade-offs to paradoxes and beyond. Organization & Environment, 28, 54-79.
77.
Van MarrewijkM. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95-105.
78.
Van MarrewijkM.WerreM. (2003). Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 107-119.
WhelanT.FinkC. (2016, October21). The comprehensive business case for sustainability. Harvard Business Review.
81.
WhitemanG.WalkerB.PeregoP. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 307-336.
82.
WilsonM. (2003). Corporate sustainability: What is it and where does it come from. Ivey Business Journal, 67(6), 1-5.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
