AguinisH.GlavasA. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932-968.
2.
AnderssonL. M.BatemanT. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 548-570.
3.
Angus-LeppanT.BennS.YoungL. (2010). A sensemaking approach to trade-offs and synergies between human and ecological elements of corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 230-244.
4.
Aragón-CorreaJ. A.Matías-RecheF.Senise-BarrioM. E. (2004). Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Research, 57, 964-975.
5.
BansalP. (2002). The corporate challenges of sustainable development. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 122-131.
6.
BansalP. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510-527.
7.
BasuK.PalazzoG. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33, 122-136.
8.
BattilanaJ.SengulM.PacheA.-C.ModelJ. (2014). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0903
9.
BoalK. B.PeeryN. (1985). The cognitive structure of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management, 11(3), 71-82.
10.
BouchikhiH. (1998). Living with and building on complexity: A constructivist perspective on organizations. Organization, 5, 217-232.
11.
BrownJ. (2009). Democracy, sustainability and dialogic accounting technologies: Taking pluralism seriously. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 313-342.
12.
BrownJ.DillardJ. (2015). Dialogic accountings for stakeholders: On opening up and closing down participatory governance. Journal of Management Studies. doi: 10.1111/joms.12153
13.
BurgelmanR. A. (1996). A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Suppl. 1), 193-214.
14.
BurgelmanR. A.GroveA. S. (1996). Strategic dissonance. California Management Review, 38(2), 8-28.
15.
ByrchC.KearinsK.MilneM. J.MorganR. (2007). Sustainable “what”? A cognitive approach to understanding sustainable development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 4(1), 26-52.
16.
ByrchC.MilneM.MorganR.KearinsK. (2015). Seeds of hope? Exploring business actors’ diverse understandings of sustainable development. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28, 671-705.
17.
de la Torre-RuizJ. M.Aragón-CorreaJ. A.Martín-TapiaI. (2013). Do individual preferences affect the environmental decision-making process in teams? The role of participation. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/bse.1830
18.
DillardJ.RoslenderR. (2011). Taking pluralism seriously: Embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 135-147.
19.
EisenhardtK. M.FurrN. R.BinghamC. B. (2010). Microfoundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21, 1263-1273.
20.
FenwickT. (2007). Developing organizational practices of ecological sustainability: A learning perspective. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28, 632-645.
21.
FerraroF.PfefferJ.SuttonR. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8-24.
22.
GaoJ.BansalP. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 241-255.
23.
GavettiG. (2005). Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16, 599-617.
24.
GioiaD. A.ChittipeddiK. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433-448.
25.
HahnT.FiggeF. (2011). Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: Toward an inclusive notion of profitability. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 325-345.
26.
HahnT.PinkseJ.PreussL.FiggeF. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127, 297-316.
27.
HahnT.PinkseJ.PreussL.FiggeF. (in press). Ambidexterity for corporate social performance. Organization Studies.
28.
HahnT.PreussL.PinkseJ.FiggeF. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39, 463-487.
29.
HaughH. M.TalwarA. (2014). Linking social entrepreneurship and social change: The mediating role of empowerment. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2449-4
30.
HockertsK. (2015). A cognitive perspective on the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24, 102-122.
31.
Howard-GrenvilleJ. A. (2006). Inside the “black box”: How organizational culture and subcultures inform interpretations and actions on environmental issues. Organization & Environment, 19, 46-73.
32.
IsaksenS. G.EkvallG. (2010). Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 73-88.
33.
JarzabkowskiP.FentonE. (2006). Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts. Long Range Planning, 39, 631-648.
34.
KaplanS. (2008). Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty. Organization Science, 19, 729-752.
35.
KironD.KruschwitzN.RubelH.ReevesM.Fuisz-KehrbachS.-K. (2013). Sustainability’s next frontier: Walking the talk on the sustainability issues that matter most. Boston: MIT Sloan & Boston Consulting Group.
36.
MaitlisS. (2005). The social processes of organizational sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 21-49.
37.
MaitlisS.LawrenceT. B. (2007). Triggers and enablers of sensegiving in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 57-84.
38.
MarkussonN. (2010). The championing of environmental improvements in technology investment projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 777-783.
39.
Miron-SpektorE.ErezM.NavehE. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740-760.
40.
NeugebauerF.FiggeF.HahnT. (2015). Planned or emergent strategy making? Exploring the formation of corporate sustainability strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/bse.1875
41.
PacheA.-C.SantosF. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 972-1001.
42.
PattersonM. G.WestM. A.ShackletonV. J.DawsonJ. F.LawthomR.MaitlisS.. . . WallaceA. M. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379-408.
43.
SeibertS. E.SilverS. R.RandolphW. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 332-349.
44.
SharmaG.GoodD. (2013). The work of middle managers: Sensemaking and sensegiving for creating positive social change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49, 95-122.
45.
SharmaS. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 681-697.
46.
SharmaS.PabloA. L.VredenburgH. (1999). Corporate environmental responsiveness strategies: The importance of issue interpretation and organizational context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 87-108.
47.
SharpZ.ZaidmanN. (2010). Strategization of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 51-71.
48.
SundaramurthyC.LewisM. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review, 28, 397-415.
49.
WhitemanG.WalkerB.PeregoP. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 307-336.
50.
WongE. M.OrmistonM. E.TetlockP. E. (2011). The effects of top management team integrative complexity and decentralized decision making on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 1207-1228.
51.
WoodmanR. W.SawyerJ. E.GriffinR. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293-321.
52.
YuanW.BaoY.VerbekeA. (2011). Integrating CSR initiatives in business: An organizing framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 75-92.
53.
ZietsmaC.VertinskyI. B. (1999). Shades of green: Cognitive framing and the dynamics of corporate environmental response. Journal of Business Administration and Policy Analysis, 27-29, 261-292.