Who Pays Attention to Indigenous Peoples in Sustainable Development and Why? Evidence From Socially Responsible Investment Mutual Funds in North America
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2014
Who Pays Attention to Indigenous Peoples in Sustainable Development and Why? Evidence From Socially Responsible Investment Mutual Funds in North America
Resource extraction and development have had significant impacts on Indigenous Peoples (IPs), and states have been slow to respond. The need for better engagement practices with IPs has been recognized internationally and in the academic literature. We examine the extent to which IPs and their rights are being recognized by non–state market–driven governance mechanisms meant to promote more sustainable business practices, in this case North American socially responsible investment (SRI) mutual funds. These funds are influential in defining SRI principles, and through shareholder activism they influence broader standards on corporate social responsibility and firm sustainability. Using a survey and a review of secondary internal documentation, we find that while some SRI funds do address IPs, recognition remains low. We find SRI funds that do pay attention have both more capabilities and a different investment orientation than those that do not, which we hypothesize limits broader uptake at this time.
AdamsonR.KlingerS. (2008). The Histories of Social Investing & Indigenous Peoples: Using the Tools of Diverse Cultures to Restore Balance to a Fractured World. First Peoples Worldwide, Fredricksburg, Virginia. Retrieved from http://www.nafoa.org/pdf/Histories-of-Social-Investing.pdf
2.
AgrestiA. (2012). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
3.
AllenR.LetourneauH.HebbT. (2012). Shareholder engagement in the extractive sector. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2(1), 3-25.
4.
AmaeshiK. (2010). Different markets for different folks: Exploring the challenges for mainstreaming responsible investment practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 41-56.
5.
AngelJ. J.RivoliP. (1997). Does socially responsible investing impose a cost upon the firm? A theoretical examination. Journal of Investing, 6(4), 57-61.
6.
ArjalièsD. L. (2010). A social movement perspective on finance: How socially responsible investment mattered. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 57-78.
7.
BabbieE. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
BallardC.BanksG. (2003). Resource wars: The anthropology of mining. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 287-313.
9.
BanerjeeS. B. (2000). Whose land is it anyway? National interest, indigenous stakeholders, and colonial discourses: The case of the Jabiluka uranium mine. Organization & Environment, 13, 3-38.
10.
BerryT. C.JunkusJ. C. (2013). Socially responsible investing: An investor perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 707-720.
11.
BlackburnC. (2005). Searching for guarantees in the midst of uncertainty: Negotiating aboriginal rights and title in British Columbia. American Anthropologist, 107, 586-596.
12.
BodleyJ. (1998). The victims of progress (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill.
BrammerS.JacksonG.MattenD. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 3-28.
CarifioJ. (2005). Indigenous peoples’ right to free, prior, informed consent: Reflections on concepts and practice. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, 22, 19-39.
18.
CashoreB. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non–state market–driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule–making authority. Governance, 15, 503-529.
19.
CoumansC. (2012). Mining, human rights and the socially responsible investment industry: Considering community opposition to shareholder resolutions and implications of collaboration. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 2, 44-63.
20.
DhirA. A. (2012). Shareholder engagement in the embedded business corporation: Investment activism, human rights, and TWAIL discourse. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 99-118.
GarrigaE.MeléD. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-71.
23.
GiddingsB.HopwoodB.O’BrienG. (2002). Environment, economy and society: Fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 10, 187-196.
24.
GuayT.DohJ. P.SinclairG. (2004). Non-governmental organizations, shareholder activism, and socially responsible investments: Ethical, strategic, and governance implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 125-139.
25.
HongH.KostovetskyL. (2012). Red and blue investing: Values and finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 103, 1-19.
26.
ImbunB. Y. (2007). Cannot manage without the significant other: Mining, corporate social responsibility and local communities in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 177-192.
27.
International Council on Mining and Metals. (2010). Good practice guide: Indigenous peoples and mining. London, England: Author.
LauferW. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253-261.
30.
LoomisT. M. (2000). Indigenous populations and sustainable development: Building on indigenous approaches to holistic, self-determined development. World Development, 28, 893-910.
31.
MackenzieC. (1998). The choice of criteria in ethical investment. Business Ethics: A European Review, 7(2), 81-86.
32.
McGeeB. (2009). Community referendum: Participatory democracy and the right to free, prior and informed consent to development. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 27, 570-635.
33.
McWilliamsA.SiegelD. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37, 1480-1495.
34.
MichelsonG.WailesN.Van Der LaanS.FrostG. (2004). Ethical investment processes and outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 1-10.
35.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California:Sage Publications Inc.
NikolakisW.CohenD.NelsonH. W. (2012). What matters for socially responsible investment in the natural resources sectors? Mutual funds and forestry in North America. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 2, 136-151.
40.
OrlitzkyM.SiegelD. S.WaldmanD. A. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & Society, 50, 6-27.
41.
OwenJ. R.KempD. (2012). Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resources Policy, 38, 29-35.
SparkesR. (2001). Ethical investment: Whose ethics, which investment?Business Ethics: A European Review, 10, 194-205.
57.
SparkesR.CowtonC. J. (2004). The maturing of socially responsible investment: A review of the developing link with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 45-57.
58.
StarikM.KanashiroP. (2013). Toward a theory of sustainability management uncovering and integrating the nearly obvious. Organization & Environment, 26, 7-30.
59.
SzablowskiD. (2010). Operationalizing free, prior, and informed consent in the extractive industry sector? Examining the challenges of a negotiated model of justice. Canadian Journal of Development Studies, 30, 111-130.
