Existing research shows that corporate climate actions are the result of public policies and a limited range of other factors that can influence business strategy. Managers are depicted as lacking agency in that they passively adhere to “drivers” of climate actions, with little room for autonomy. This study takes issue with such a view by examining agency vis-à-vis managers’ temporal orientations. In particular, we seek to examine why managers adopt certain temporal orientations and not others in the context of the climate issue and Swedish electricity production. We find that whilst managers are predominantly focused on future policy developments, they also deliberate over, reconstruct, and in some cases actively refute other pressures for climate action that were borne in the past, feature in the present, and which relate to alternative future projections. We further examine reasons for such behaviour.
AbernathyW.ClarkK. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3-22.
2.
AlvarezJ. L.MazzaC.Strandgaard PedersenJ.SvejenovaS. (2005). Shielding idiosyncrasy from isomorphic pressures: Towards optimal distinctiveness in European film making. Organization, 12, 863-888.
3.
BarnesB. (2000). Understanding agency: Social theory and responsible action. London, England: Sage.
4.
BattilanaJ.LecaB.BoxenbaumE. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107.
5.
BerroneP.FosfurriA.GelabertL.Gomez-MejiaL. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of “green” inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 891-909. doi:10.1002/smj.2041
6.
BoiralO. (2006). Global warming: Should companies adopt a proactive strategy?Long Range Planning, 39, 315-330.
7.
BorumF. (2004). Means-end frames and the politics and myths of organizational fields. Organization Studies, 25, 897-921.
8.
BoxenbaumE. (2006). Lost in translation: The making of Danish diversity management. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 939-948.
9.
BoxenbaumE.BattilanaJ. (2005). Importation as innovation: Transposing managerial practices across fields. Strategic Organization, 3, 355-383.
10.
BrunoK. (2000, December14). BP: Beyond petroleum or beyond preposterous?Corporate Watch.
CohenW. M.LevinthalD. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
13.
CzarniawskaB. (2008). How to misuse institutions and get away with it: Some reflections on institutional theory(ies). In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 769-782). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DavidP. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75, 332-337.
15.
DelmasM.ToffelM. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 209-222.
16.
DelmasM.ToffelM. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the blackbox. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 1027-1055.
17.
DemilB.BensédrineJ. (2005). Process of legitimation and pressure toward regulation. International Studies of Management & Organization, 35(2), 58-79.
18.
Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC (L 140/16). Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:SOM:en:HTML
19.
DonaldsonT.PrestonL. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
DotzauerE. (2010). Greenhouse gas emissions from power generation and consumption in a Nordic perspective. Energy Policy, 38, 701-704.
22.
DunnS. (2002). Down to business on climate change. Greener Management International, 39, 27-41.
23.
EmirbayerM.MischeA. (1998). What is agency?American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962-1023.
24.
FligsteinN. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105-125.
25.
FoxonT. J. (2002). Technological and institutional “lock-in” as a barrier to sustainable innovation (ICCEPT working paper). Retrieved from www.imperial.ac.uk
26.
GarudR.JainS.KumaraswamyA. (2002). Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: The case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 196-214.
27.
GlynnM. A.LounsburyM. (2005). From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1031-1055.
28.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 27-48.
29.
GreenwoodR.SuddabyR.HiningsC. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 58-80.
30.
HandfieldR.SroufeR.WaltonS. (2005). Integrating environmental management and supply chain strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(1), 1-19.
31.
HardyC.MaguireS. (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Shalin-AndersonK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 198-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
HendersonR. M.ClarkK. B. (1990). Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 9-30.
33.
HendryJ. R. (2006). Taking aim at business: What factors lead environmental non-governmental organizations to target particular firms. Business & Society, 45(1), 47-86.
34.
HoffmanA. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351-371.
35.
HoffmanA. J. (2002). Examining the rhetoric: The strategic implications of climate change policy. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9, 329-337.
36.
HoffmanA. J.VentrescaM. J. (1999). The institutional framing of policy debates: Economics versus the environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 1368-1392.
37.
HolmP. (1995). The dynamics of institutionalization: Transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 398-422.
38.
HughesT. P. (1983). Networks of power: Electrification in Western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
JeppersonR. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (Part 2, Chapter 6). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
40.
JonesC. A.LevyD. L. (2007). North American business strategies towards climate change. European Management Journal, 25, 428-440.
41.
KemptonW.CraigP. P. (1993). European perspectives on global climate change. Environment, 35(3), 16-45.
42.
KolkA. (2000). Economics of environmental management. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
43.
KolkA.LevyD. (2001). Winds of change: Corporate strategy, climate change and oil multinationals. European Management Journal, 19, 501-509.
44.
KolkA.PinkseJ. (2004). Market strategies for climate change. European Management Journal, 22, 304-314.
45.
Konkurrensverket. (2008). Bryt upp samägandet inom kärnkraften 2008-09-12 (Dissolve the joint ownership of nuclear power Dnr 500/2008). Stockholm, Sweden: Author. Retrieved from www.konkurrensverket.se
46.
KraatzM. (2009). Leadership as institutional work: A bridge to the other side. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 59-91). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
47.
KshetriN. (2010). Normative and cognitive institutions affecting a firm’s e-commerce adoption. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 11, 157-174.
48.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2009). Introduction: Theorizing and studying institutional work. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 1-28). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49.
LevyD. L.EganD. (2003). A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 803-829.
50.
LevyD. L.KolkA. (2002). Strategic responses to global climate change: Conflicting pressures on multinationals in the oil industry. Business and Politics, 4, 275-300.
51.
LevyD. L.NewellP. (2000). Oceans apart? Business responses to global environmental issues in Europe and the United States. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 42(9), 8-21.
52.
LülfsR.HahnR. (2014). Sustainable behavior in the business sphere: A comprehensive overview of the explanatory power of psychological models. Organization & Environment, 27, 43-64.
53.
MaguireS.HardyC.LawrenceT. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 657-679.
54.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
55.
MartinN.RiceJ. (2010). Analysing emission intensive firms as regulatory stakeholders: A role for adaptable business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 64-75.
56.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47, 499-522.
57.
MisangyiV. F.WeaverG. R.ElmsH. (2008). Ending corruption: The interplay among institutional logics, resources, and institutional entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Review, 33, 750-770.
58.
MorrillC.Owen-SmithJ. (2002). The emergence of environmental conflict resolution: Subversive stories and the construction of collective action frames and organizational fields. In VentrescaM.HoffmanA. (Eds.), Organizations, policy, and the natural environment: Institutional and strategic perspectives (pp. 90-118). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
59.
OkerekeC. (2007). An exploration of motivations, drivers and barriers to carbon management: The UK FTSE 100. European Management Journal, 25, 475-486.
60.
OkerekeC.RussellD. (2010). Regulatory pressure and competitive dynamics: Carbon management strategies of UK energy-intensive companies. California Management Review, 52(4), 100-124.
61.
PhillipsN.LawrenceT. B.HardyC. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635-652.
62.
PinkseJ. (2007). Corporate intentions to participate in emission trading. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(1), 12-25.
63.
ReinhardtF. L. (2000). Down to earth: Applying business principles to environmental management. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
64.
RugmanA. M.VerbekeA. (2000). Six cases of corporate strategic responses to environmental regulation. European Management Journal, 18, 377-385.
65.
SahlinK.WedlinL. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218-242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
SarasiniS. (2009). Constituting leadership via policy: Sweden as a pioneer of climate change mitigation. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 14(7), 635–-653.
67.
SarasiniS. (2013). Institutional work and climate change: Corporate political action in the Swedish electricity industry. Energy Policy, 56, 480-489.
68.
ScottW. R. (2007). Institutions and organizations: Ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69.
SeoM.CreedW. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27, 222-247.
70.
SharmaS.VredenburgH. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729-753.
71.
SijmJ.NeuhoffK.ChenY. (2006). CO2 cost pass through and windfall profits in the power sector. Climate Policy, 6(1), 49-72.
72.
SkjærsethJ. B.SkodvinT. (2001). Climate change and the oil industry: Common problems, different strategies. Global Environmental Politics, 1(4), 43-64.
73.
StarikM.KushaniroP. (2013). Toward a theory of sustainability management: Uncovering and integrating the nearly obvious. Organization & Environment, 26, 7-30.
74.
StrannegårdL. (2000). Flexible couplings: Combining business goals and environmental concern. Business Strategy and the Environment, 9, 163-174.
75.
StuartD.ScheweR. L.McDermottM. (2012). Responding to climate change: Barriers to reflexive modernization in U.S. agriculture. Organization & Environment, 25, 308-327.
ZietsmaC.McKnightB. (2009). Building the iron cage: Institutional creation work in the context of competing proto-institutions. In LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 143-177). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
83.
ZilberT. B. (2007). Stories and the discursive dynamics of institutional entrepreneurship: The case of Israeli high-tech after the bubble. Organization Studies, 28, 1035-1054.
