Current sociological interest in “real utopias” demands a critical evaluation of potential academic contributions to the subject. The following is a sociological critique of the real utopian project of abolishing the antithesis between town and country. The analysis uncovers a fundamental dilemma in theorizing how to transform this antithesis. On one hand, social and natural scientists have acknowledged that modern urbanization and the urban–rural divide contribute to the creation of a rift in the relationship between humans and the natural environment. On the other hand, modern cities, based on arguments about the efficiency of urban density, are defended by a wide variety of scholars. Nevertheless, in turning to a socioecological framework of analysis based on the work of Marx and Engels and metabolic rift theory, this dilemma can be resolved. This framework emphasizes that modern cities are the result of interdependent development, which is expressed through the antithesis between town and country. This antithesis is the intervening mechanism in which the metabolic rift is spatially observed and carried out. That the ecological rift is now planetary demands a real utopian project in which dramatically different social and spatial relations are theorized.
AminS. (2003). World poverty, pauperization, & capital accumulation. Monthly Review, 55, 1-9.
2.
AminS. (2009). Capitalism and the ecological footprint. Monthly Review, 61, 19-22.
3.
AndersonC. H. (1976). The sociology of survival: Social problems of growth. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
4.
AraghiF. A. (1995). Global depeasantization, 1945-1990. Sociological Quarterly, 36, 337-368.
5.
AraghiF. A. (2000). The great global enclosure of our times: Peasants and the agrarian question at the end of the twentieth century. In MagdoffF.FosterJ. B.ButtelF. H. (Eds.), Hungry for profit: The agribusiness threat to farmers, food, and the environment (pp. 145-160). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
6.
AshtonP. J. (1984). Urbanization and the dynamics of suburban development under capitalism. In TabbW. K.SawersL. (Eds.), Marxism and the metropolis: New perspectives in urban political economy (2nd ed., pp. 54-81). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BagchiA. K. (2005). Perilous passage: Mankind and the ascendancy of capital. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
BettencourtL.WestG. (2010). A unified theory of urban living. Nature, 467, 912-913.
9.
BookchinM. (1974). The limits of the city. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
10.
BravermanH. (1975). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
11.
BrookfieldH. C. (1975). Interdependent development. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
BurawoyM. (2005). The critical turn to public sociology. Critical Sociology, 31, 313-326.
13.
BurkettP. (1999). Marx and nature: A red and green perspective. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
14.
CattonW. R.Jr. (1980). Overshoot: The ecological basis of revolutionary change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
15.
ClarkB. (2003). Ebenezer Howard and the marriage of town and country: An introduction to Howard’sGarden Cities of Tomorrow (Selections). Organization & Environment, 16, 87-97.
16.
ClarkB.FosterJ. B. (2006). The environmental conditions of the working class: An introduction to selections from Frederick Engels’sThe Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844. Organization & Environment, 19, 375-388.
17.
ClarkB.YorkR. (2005). Carbon metabolism: Global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and Society, 34, 391-428.
18.
ClementM. T. (2009). A basic accounting of variation in municipal solid waste generation at the county-level in Texas, 2006: Groundwork for applying metabolic-rift theory to waste generation. Rural Sociology, 74, 412-429.
19.
ClementM. T. (2010). Urbanization and the natural environment: An environmental sociological overview and synthesis. Organization & Environment, 23, 291-314.
20.
ClementM. T.SchultzJ. (in press). Political economy, ecological modernization and energy use: A panel analysis of state-level energy use in the United States of America, 1960-1990. Sociological Forum.
21.
CrononW. (1992). Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great West. New York, NY: Norton.
22.
DavisM. (2006). Planet of slums. London, England: Verso.
23.
DeFriesR. S.RudelT.UriarteM.HansenM. (2010). Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience, 3, 178-181.
24.
DodmanD. (2009). Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environment & Urbanization, 21, 185-201.
25.
DybasC. L. (2005). Dead zones spreading in world oceans. BioScience, 55, 552-557.
26.
EngelsF. (1935). The housing question. New York, NY: International Publishers.
27.
FialaN. (2008). Measuring sustainability: Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science. Ecological Economics, 67, 519-525.
28.
FolkeC.JanssonÅ.LarssonJ.CostanzaR. (1997). Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio, 26, 167-172.
29.
FosterJ. B. (1998). William Morris’s letters on Epping Forest: An introduction. Organization & Environment, 11, 90-92.
30.
FosterJ. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 366-405.
31.
FosterJ. B. (2009). The ecological revolution: Making peace with the planet. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
32.
FosterJ. B.ClarkB.YorkR. (2010). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the planet. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
33.
GordonD. M. (1984). Capitalist development and the history of American cities. In TabbW. K.SawersL. (Eds.), Marxism and the metropolis: New perspectives in urban political economy (pp. 21-53). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
GraziF.van den BerghJ. C. J. M.RietveldP. (2007). Spatial welfare economics versus ecological footprint: Modeling agglomeration, externalities and trade. Environmental & Resource Economics, 38, 135-153.
35.
GrimmN. B.FaethS. H.GolubiewskiN. E.RedmanC. L.WuJ.BaiX.BriggsJ. M. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756-760.
36.
HainesM. R. (2001). The urban mortality transition in the United States, 1800-1940. Annales de Démographie Historique, 1, 33-64.
37.
HarveyD. (1982). The limits to capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
HarveyD. (1985). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
HarveyD. (1996). Justice, nature, & the geography of difference. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
40.
HowardE. (1902). Garden cities of to-morrow. London, England: Swan Sonnenschein.
41.
HumphreyC. R.LewisT. L.ButtelF. H. (2002). Environment, energy, and society: A new synthesis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
42.
ImhoffM. L.BounouaL.DeFriesR.LawrenceW. T.StutzerD.TuckerC. J.RickettsT. (2004). The consequences of urban land transformation on net primary productivity in the United States. Remote Sensing of Environment, 89, 434-443.
43.
IssermanA. M. (2005). In the national interest: Defining rural and urban correctly in research and public policy. International Regional Science Review, 28, 465-499.
44.
JacobsJ. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York, NY: Random House.
45.
JorgensonA. K.RiceJ.ClarkB. (2010). Cities, slums, and energy consumption in less-developed countries, 1990-2005. Organization & Environment, 23, 189-204.
46.
KatznelsonI. (1992). Marxism and the city. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
47.
KayeJ. P.GroffmanP. M.GrimmN. B.BakerL. A.PouyatR. V. (2006). A distinct urban biogeochemistry?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 192-199.
48.
LoganJ. R.MolotchH. L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
49.
LondonB.SmithD. A. (1988). Urban bias, dependence, and economic stagnation in noncore nations. American Sociological Review, 53, 454-463.
MancusP. (2007). Nitrogen fertilizer dependency and its contradictions: A theoretical exploration of social-ecological metabolism. Rural Sociology, 72, 269-288.
52.
MerringtonJ. (1975). Town and country in the transition to capitalism. New Left Review, 93, 71-92.
53.
MooreJ. W. (2003). The Modern World-System as environmental history? Ecology and the rise of capitalism. Theory and Society, 32, 307-377.
54.
MooreJ. W. (2011). Ecology, capital, and the nature of our times: Accumulation & crisis in the capitalist world-ecology. Journal of World-Systems Research, XVII, 107-146.
MumfordL. (1961). The city in history: Its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
57.
NewmanP. (2006). The environmental impact of cities. Environment & Urbanization, 18, 275-295.
58.
NewmanP.KenworthyJ. R. (1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence. Washington, DC: Island Press.
59.
ParshallL.GurneyK.HammerS. A.MendozaD.ZhouY.GeethakumarS. (2010). Modeling energy consumption and CO2 emissions at the urban scale: Methodological challenges and insights from the United States. Energy Policy, 38, 4765-4782.
60.
PatakiD. E.AligR. J.FungA. S.GolubiewskiE.KennedyC. A.McPhersonE. G.. . . Romero LankaoP. (2006). Urban ecosystems and the North American carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 12, 2092-2102.
61.
PaulM. J.MeyerJ. L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 333-365.
62.
PerrowC. (2007). The next catastrophe: Reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
ReesW. E.WackernagelM. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable-and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16, 223-248.
64.
RiceJ. (2008). The urbanization of poverty and urban slum prevalence: The impact of the built environment on population-level patterns of social well-being in the less developed countries. In KronenfeldJ. J. (Ed.), Research in the sociology of health care: Vol.26. Care for major health problems and population health concerns: Impacts on patients, providers, and policy (pp. 205-234). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
65.
RockströmJ.SteffenW.NooneK.PerssonÅ.ChapinF. S.IIILambinE. F.. . . FoleyJ. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475.
66.
SassenS.DotanN. (in press). Delegating, not returning, to the biosphere: How to use the multi-scalar and ecological properties of cities. Global Environmental Change.
67.
SchnaibergA. (1980). The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
68.
SchneiderM.McMichaelP. (2010). Deepening, and repairing, the metabolic rift. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37, 461-484.
69.
ShandraJ.LondonB.WilliamsonJ. B. (2003). Environmental degradation, environmental sustainability, and overurbanization in the developing world: A quantitative, cross-national analysis. Sociological Perspectives, 46, 309-329.
70.
SmithN. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
71.
van den BerghJ.GraziF. (2010). On the policy relevance of ecological footprints. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 4843-4844.
72.
VitousekP. M.MooneyH. A.LubchencoJ.MelilloJ. M. (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277, 494-499.
73.
WilliamsR. (1973). The country and the city. London: The Hogarth Press.
74.
WrightE. O. (2010). Envisioning real utopias. London, England: Verso.
75.
YorkR. (2008). De-carbonization in former soviet republics, 1992-2000: The ecological consequences of de-modernization. Social Problems, 55, 370-390.
76.
YorkR.MancusP. (2009). Critical human ecology: Historical materialism and natural laws. Sociological Theory, 27, 122-149.
