Companies do not respond identically when faced with similar environmental issues, confounding research that looks only at external influences on corporate environmental practice. In this article, the author explores the role of internal factors, specifically an organization's culture and subcultures, in shaping a company's interpretations and actions on environmental issues. Organizational culture influences how an organization's members define, or “set,” problems and the strategies they draw on to solve such problems. Drawing from a 9-month ethnographic study of a high-tech manufacturer, the author finds that the existence of multiple subcultures gives rise to divergent interpretations and strategies for action for environmental issues and that the relative power of the subcultures influences which interpretations and strategies for action are ultimately adopted. Differences between subcultures and the nature of the relationships between them can explain some of the variation in attention and action observed as organizations address issues of environmental protection.
Andersson, L. M.,& Bateman, T. S. (2000). Individual environmental initiative: Championing natural environmental issues in U.S. business organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 548-570.
2.
Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28, 71-88.
3.
Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environment issues. Organization Science, 14, 510-525.
4.
Bansal, P.,& Penner, W. J. (2002). Interpretations of institutions: The case of recycled newsprint. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment(pp. 311-326). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Bloor, G., & Dawson, P. (1994). Understanding professional culture in organizational context. Organization Studies, 15, 275-295.
6.
Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 663-680.
7.
Crane, A. (2000). Corporate greening as amoralization. Organization Studies, 21, 673-696.
8.
Creed, W. E. D., Scully, M. A.,& Austin, J. R. (2002). Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13, 475-496.
Dodge, J. (1997). Reassessing culture and strategy: Environmental improvement, structure, leadership and control. In R. Welford (Ed.), Corporate environmental management: Culture and organizations(pp. 104-126). London: Earthscan.
11.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Praeger.
12.
Douglas, M. (1978). Cultural bias(Occasional Paper No. 35 of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland). London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
13.
Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993). Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18, 397-428.
14.
Egri, C. P., & Herman, S. (2000). Leadership in the North American environmental sector: Values, leadership styles, and contexts of environmental leaders and their organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 571-604.
15.
Emerson, T., & Welford, R. (1997). Power, organizational culture and ecological abuse. In R. Welford (Ed.), Corporate environmental management: Culture and organizations(pp. 57-75). London: Earthscan.
16.
Forbes, L. C., & Jermier, J. M. (2002). The institutionalization of voluntary organizational greening and the ideals of environmentalism: Lessons about official culture from symbolic organization theory. In A. J. Hoffman & M. J. Ventresca (Eds.), Organizations, policy and the natural environment(pp. 194-213). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The interpretation of cultures(pp. 3-30). New York: Basic Books.
18.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., & Krauss, T. S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.
20.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
21.
Goldman, M.,& Schurman, R. A. (2000). Closing the “great divide”: New social theory on society and nature. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 563-584.
22.
Goodenough, W. (1971). Culture, language, and society. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
23.
Gregory, K. (1983). Native-view paradigms: Multiple cultures and culture conflict in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 359-376.
24.
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2003). Shades of green: Business, regulation, and environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
Hatch, M. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18, 657-693.
26.
Halme, M. (1997). Developing an environmental culture through organizational change and learning. In R. Welford (Ed.), Corporate environmental management: Culture and organizations(pp. 79-103). London: Earthscan.
27.
Halme, M. (2002). Corporate environmental paradigms in shift: Learning during the course of action at UPM-Kymmene. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1087-1109.
28.
Hoffman, A. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351-371.
29.
Hofstede, G. (1998). Identifying organizational subcultures: An empirical approach. Journal of Management Studies, 35, 1-12.
30.
Howard-Grenville, J. A. (2000). Inside out: A cultural study of environmental work in semiconductor manufacturing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
31.
Huang, J., Newell, S., Galliers, R.,& Pan, S. (2003). Dangerous liaisons? Component-based development and organizational subcultures. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 89-99.
32.
Hunt, C., & Auster, E. (1990). Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review, 31, 7-18.
33.
Jaffe, A., Peterson, S.,& Stavins, R. (1995). Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us?Journal of Economic Literature, 23(March), 132-163.
34.
Jennings, P. D., & Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015-1052.
35.
Jermier, J., Slocum, J., Fry, L., & Gaines, J. (1991). Organizational subcultures in a soft bureaucracy: Resistance behind the myth and façade of an official culture. Organization Science, 2, 170-194.
36.
Kunda, G. (1992). Engineering culture: Control and commitment in a high-tech corporation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
37.
Lawrence, P. R.,& Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 1-47.
38.
Martin, J. (2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Martin, J., & Siehl, C. (1983). Organizational culture and counter-culture: An uneasy symbiosis. Organizational Dynamics, 12, 52-64.
40.
Meima, R. (1997). The challenge of ecological logic: Explaining distinctive organizational phenomena in corporate environmental management. In R. Welford (Ed.), Corporate environmentalmanagement: Culture and organizations(pp. 26-56). London: Earthscan.
41.
Meyerson, D. (1991). Acknowledging and uncovering ambiguities in cultures. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg,& J. Martin (Eds.), Reframing organizational culture(pp. 254-270). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Meyerson, D.,& Martin, J. (1987). Cultural change: An integration of three different views. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 623-647.
43.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
Newton, T. J. (2003). Creating the new ecological order? Elias and actor-network theory. Academy of Management Review, 27, 523-540.
45.
Numagami, T. (1998). The infeasibility of invariant laws in management studies: A reflective dialogue in defense of case studies. Organization Science, 9, 2-15.
46.
Ocasio, W. (1997). Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 187-206.
47.
Peluso, N. L. (1992). Coercing conservation? The politics of state resource control. Global Environmental Change, 3, 199-217.
48.
Perrow, C. (1972). Complex organizations: A critical essay. Chicago: Scott Foresman.
49.
Phillips, M. (1994). Industry mindsets: Exploring the cultures of two macro-organizational settings. Organization Science, 5, 384-402.
50.
Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review, 73, 120-134.
51.
Prakash, A. (2000). Greening the firm: The politics of corporate environmentalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Reinhardt, F. (1999). Market failure and the environmental policies of firms: Economic rationales for ‘beyond compliance'behavior. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(1), 9-21.
53.
Riley, P. (1983). A structurationist account of political culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 414-437.
54.
Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1, 11-23.
55.
Russo, M. V.,& Fouts, P. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 534-559.
56.
Sackmann, S. (1992). Culture and subcultures: An analysis of organizational knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 140-161.
57.
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58.
Schein, E. H. (1996). Three cultures of management: The key to organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 38, 9-20.
59.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
60.
Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 681-697.
61.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). Ecocentric management in a risk society. Academy of Management Review, 20, 118-137.
62.
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339-358.
63.
Starkey, K.,& Crane, A. (2003). Toward green narrative: Management and the evolutionary epic. Academy of Management Review, 28, 220-237.
64.
Stevenson, W., & Bartunek, J. (1996). Power, interaction, position, and the generation of cultural agreement in organizations. Human Relations, 49, 75-104.
65.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273-286.
66.
Tichy, N. (1982). Managing change strategically: The technical, political, and cultural keys. Organizational Dynamics, 11, 59-80.
67.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68.
Van Maanen, J., & Barley, S. R. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 287-365.
69.
Van Maanen, J.,& Barley, S. R. (1985). Cultural organization: Fragments of a theory. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundberg, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organization culture(pp. 31-53). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70.
Watts, M. (1998). Nature as artifice and artifact. In B. Braun& N. Castree (Eds.), Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium(pp. 243-268). New York: Routledge.
71.
Weeks, J. (2004). Unpopular culture: The ritual of complaint in a British bank. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72.
Welford, R. (Ed.). (1997). Corporate environmental management: Culture and organizations. London: Earthscan.
