The work of Pellow, Gould, Schnaiberg, and Weinberg (particularly Schnaiberg’s The Environment and his notion of the treadmill of production) became one of the most influential strands of North American environmental sociology during the late 1970s and early 1980s for a number of reasons. It is fair to say, however, that the treadmill of production is not as predominant in environmental sociology in the early 21st century as it was two decades ago. Some of the reasons for this are unfortunate products of our time—for example, the declining role of neo-Marxism in a scholarly community that must watch its back in an era of neoliberalism. In the final portion of this article, the author discusses some shortcomings of the treadmill framework that have led to its being less influential than formerly and lays out an agenda for further treadmill of production inquiry.
Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century. London: Verso.
2.
Benton, T. (Ed.). (1996). The greening of Marxism. New York: Guilford.
3.
Bookchin, M. (1971). Post-Scarcity anarchism. Berkeley, CA: Ramparts.
4.
Bunker, S. G. (1992). Natural resource extraction and power differentials in a global economy. In S. Ortiz & S. Lees (Eds.), Understanding economic process(pp. 61-84). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
5.
Burkett, P. (1999). Marx and nature. New York: St. Martin’s.
6.
Buttel, F. H. (2003). Environmental sociology and the explanation of environmental reform. Organization & Environment, 16(3), 306-344.
7.
Buttel, F. H., & Gijswijt, A. (2000). Emerging trends in environmental sociology. In J. R. Blau (Ed.), Blackwell companion to sociology(pp. 43-57). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
8.
Dickens, P. (2004). Society and nature. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
9.
Dunlap, R. E. (1997). The evolution of environmental sociology: Abrief history and assessment of the American experience. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), International handbook of environmental sociology(pp. 21-39). London: Edward Elgar.
10.
Dunlap, R. E.,& Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994, Spring). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline, and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25, 5-30.
11.
Foster, J. B. (1986). The theory of monopoly capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
12.
Foster, J. B. (1999, September). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 366-405.
13.
Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology. New York: Monthly Review Press.
14.
Foster, J. B. (2002). Environmental sociology and the environmental revolution: A 25th anniversary assessment. Organization & Environment, 15, 55-58.
15.
Goldman, M.,& Schurman, R. A. (2000). Closing the “great divide”: New social theory on society and nature. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 563-584.
16.
Gorz, A. (1994). Capitalism, socialism, ecology. London: Verso.
17.
Gould, K. A., Schnaiberg, A., & Weinberg, A. S. (1996). Local environmental struggles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Macnaghten, P., & Urry, J. (1998). Contested natures. London: Sage.
19.
Martinez-Alier, J. (1987). Ecological economics. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
20.
Martinez-Alier, J. (2003, March). Problems of ecological degradation: Environmental justice or ecological modernization?Capitalism Nature Socialism, 14, 133-138.
21.
Maurer, B. A. (1999). Untangling ecological complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Mills, C. W. (1962). The Marxists. New York: Dell.
23.
Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2002). Ecological modernization and the environmental state. In A. P. J. Mol & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), The environmental state under pressure(pp. 33-52). London: Elsevier North-Holland.
24.
Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 309-332.
25.
O’Connor, J. (1973). The fiscal crisis of the state. New York: St. Martin’s.
26.
O’Connor, J. (1994). Is sustainable capitalism possible? In M. O’Connor (Ed.), Is capitalism sustainable?(pp. 53-75). New York: Guilford.
27.
O’Connor, J. (1998). Natural causes. New York: Guilford.
28.
O’Connor, J. (2002). Introduction to the Transaction edition. The fiscal crisis of the state. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
29.
Pellow, D.,& Park, L. S.-H. (2003). The Silicon Valley of dreams. New York: New York University Press.
30.
Redclift, M. (1996). Wasted. London: Earthscan.
31.
Schnaiberg, A. (1975). Social syntheses of the societal-environmental dialectic: The role of distributional impacts. Social Science Quarterly, 56, 5-20.
32.
Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Schnaiberg, A. (2002, March). Reflections on my 25 years before the mast of the environment and technology section. Organization & Environment, 15(1), 30-41.
34.
Schnaiberg, A., & Gould, K. (1994). Environment and society. New York: St. Martin’s.
35.
Schnaiberg, A., Pellow, D., & Weinberg, A. (2002). The treadmill of production and the environmental state. In A. P. J. Mol& F. H. Buttel (Eds.), The environmental state under pressure(pp. 15-32). London: Elsevier North-Holland.
36.
Scoones, I. (1999). Newecology and the social sciences: What prospects for fruitful engagement. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 479-507.
37.
Shanin, T. (1983). Late Marx and the Russian road. New York: Monthly Review Press.
