Normal Accidents’ growing influence since 1984 on social science scholarship and across academic, business and governmental disciplines was not accidental. Author Charles Perrow intended to shake up the study of safety and bring organization theory into the fore-front. This article examines ongoing debates about the management of technological systems, reviews the book’s important seeds of theory, and discusses the theoretical and practical issues related to a world growing more complex and technologically hazardous.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beam, A. (2003, February 4). Columbia: A “Normal Accident.” Boston Globe, p. E1.
2.
Dain, S. (2002). Normal accidents: Human error and medical equipment design. Heart Surgery Forum, 5(3), 254-257.
3.
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1997). The poetry of thermodynamics: Energy, entropy/exergy and quality. Futures, 29(9), 791-810.
Harper, C. L., & Schutte-Murray, R. K. (1998). Religion and the sociology of culture: Exploring the organizational cultures of two midwestern Roman Catholic dioceses. Review of Religious Research, 40(2), 101-119.
6.
Heise, U. K. (2002). Toxins, drugs, and global systems: Risk and narrative in the contemporary novel. American Literature, 74(4), 747-778.
7.
I&M Rail Bank v. Northstar Navigation, 198 F.3d 1012 (2000).
8.
Landau, M. (1969). Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review, 29(4), 350.
9.
MacKenzie, D. (1996). Knowing machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Merritt, T. A., Palmer, D., Bergman, D. A., & Shiono, P. H. (1997). Clinical practice guidelines in pediatric and newborn medicine: Implications for their use in practice. Pediatrics, 99(1), 100-114.
11.
Nickles, D. P. (1999). Telegraph diplomats: The United States’ relations with France in 1848 and 1870. Technology and Culture, 40(1), 1-25.
12.
Pate-Cornell, M. E., Lakats, L. M., Murphy, D. M., & Gaba, D. M. (1997). Anesthesia patient risk: A quantitative approach to organizational factors and risk management options. Risk Analysis, 17(4), 511-523.
13.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. (1st ed.). New York: Basic Books.
14.
Perrow, C. (1999). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technologies. (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Reams, M. A., & Templet, P. H. (1996). Political and environment equity issues related to municipal waste incineration siting. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 47(1-3), 313-323.
16.
Sagan, S. D. (in press). The problem of redundancy problem: Why more nuclear security forces may produce less nuclear security. Risk Analysis.
17.
Sagan, S. D., & Valentino, B. A. (1994, August). Nuclear weapons safety after the cold war (Report of a NATO Advanced Research Workshop). Stanford, CA: Center For International Security and Cooperation.
18.
Scarce, R. (1997). Socially constructing Pacific salmon. Society and Animals, 5(2), 117-135.
19.
Snook, S. (2000). Friendly fire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Stamatelatos, M. G. (2002). New thrust for probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) at NASA, October 28, 2002. National Aeronautics and Space Administration presentation. Retrieved July 24, 2003, from www.sra.org/Stamatelatos.pdf
21.
Thompson, P. B. (1999). From a philosopher’s perspective, how should animal scientists meet the challenge of contentious issues? Journal of Animal Science, 77(2), 372-377.
22.
Wolf, F. G. (2001). Operationalizing and testing normal accidents theory in petrochemical plants and refineries. Production and Operations Management, 10(3), 292-305.
