This article investigates the writings of American institutional economist Thorstein Bunde Veblen (1857-1929) on capitalism and environment. The two main queries concern (a) Veblen’s stand on natural resource utilization as a consequence of capitalism and (b) its current relevance to environmental sociology. Veblen’s theories of conspicuous consumption, absentee ownership, and natural resource exploitation are examined from several of his seminal contributions. The article concludes that Veblen’s pioneering analysis of wasteful use of natural resources and emulative consumerism is essential to environmental sociology and timely because of current environmental crises. Future research is suggested in two areas: (a) applying Veblen’s theoretical approaches to the ecological aspects of capitalism and (b) comparing Veblen with other classical theorists such as Marx and Weber within the subfield of environmental sociology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashley, D. , & Orenstein, D. M. (1998). Sociological theory: Classical statements (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
2.
Baran, P. A. , & Sweezy, P. M. (1966). Monopoly capital: An essay on the American economic and social order. New York: Monthly Review Press.
3.
Barkley, P. W. , & Seckler, D. W. (1972). Economic growth and environmental decay. New York: Harcourt Brace.
4.
Bell, M. M. (1998). An invitation to environmental sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
5.
Benton, T. (Ed.). (1996). The greening of Marxism. New York: Guilford.
6.
Boles, J. M. (1998). James Rorty’s social ecology: Technology, culture, and the economic base of an environmentally sustainable society. Organization & Environment, 11, 155-179.
7.
Burch, W. R., Jr. (1971). Daydreams and nightmares: A sociological essay on the American environment. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
Burkett, P. (1999). Marx and nature: A red and green perspective. New York: St. Martin’s.
9.
Buttel, F. H. (1996). Environmental and resource sociology. Rural Sociology, 61(1), 56-76.
10.
Buttel, F. H. (1997). Social institutions and environmental change. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 40-54). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
11.
Buttel, F. H., & Humphrey, C. R. (1996). Sociological theory and the natural environment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin at Madison.
12.
Buttel, F. H. , Larson, O. L., & Gillespie, G. W. (1990). The sociology of agriculture. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
13.
Catton, W. R., Jr. , & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13, 252-256.
14.
Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle: Nature, man, and technology. New York: Knopf.
15.
Diggins, J. P. (1993). Thorstein Veblen and the literature of the theory class. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 6(4), 481-490.
16.
Dorfman, J. (1958). The source and impact of Veblen’s thought. In D. F. Dowd (Ed.), Thorstein Veblen: A critical reappraisal (pp. 1-12). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
17.
Dunlap, R. E. (1997). The evolution of environmental sociology. In M. Redclift & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 21-39). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
18.
Dunlap, R. E. , & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1979). Environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 243-273.
19.
Dunlap, R. E. , & Catton, W. R., Jr. (1994). Struggling with human exemptionalism: The rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. The American Sociologist, 25, 5-29.
20.
Field, D. R. , & Burch, W. R., Jr. (1988). Rural sociology and the environment. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
21.
Foster, J. B. (1994). The vulnerable planet: A short economic history of the environment. New York: Monthly Review Press.
22.
Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: Classical foundations for environmental sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366-405.
23.
Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press.
24.
Foster, J. B. , & Szlajfer, H. (Eds.). (1984). The faltering economy: The problem of accumulation under monopoly capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
25.
Freudenburg, W. R. , Frickel, S., & Gramling, R. (1995). Beyond the nature/society divide: Learning to think about a mountain. Sociological Forum, 10(3), 361-391.
26.
Galbraith, J. K. (1969). The affluent society (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. (Original work published 1958)
27.
Gimenez, M. E. (2000). Does ecology need Marx?Organization & Environment, 13, 292-304.
28.
Gould, K. A. , Schnaiberg, A., & Weinberg, A. S. (1996). Local environmental struggles: Citizen activism in the treadmill of production. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Gross, M. (2000). Classical sociology and the restoration of nature: The relevance of Émile Durkheim and Georg Simmel. Organization & Environment, 13, 277-291.
30.
Hamilton, D. B. (1987). Institutional economics and consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(4), 1531-1554.
31.
Hamilton, W. (1958). Veblen—Then and now. In D. F. Dowd (Ed.), Thorstein Veblen: A critical reappraisal (pp. 13-23). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
32.
Hughey, M. W. , & Vidich, A. J. (1993). Veblen, Weber and Marx on political economy. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 6(4), 491-505.
33.
Humphrey, C. R. , & Buttel, F. H. (1982). Environment, energy and society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34.
Innis, H. A. (1929). A bibliography of Thorstein Veblen. The Southwestern Political and Social Science Quarterly, 10(1), 56-68.
35.
Innis, H. A. (1930). The fur trade in Canada: An introduction to Canadian economic history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36.
Jacobs, W. (1980). Indians as ecologists and other environmental themes in American frontier history. In C. Vecsey & R. W. Venables (Eds.), American Indian environments: Ecological issues in Native American history (pp. 46-64). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
37.
Kapp, K. W. (1950). The social cost of private enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
Kapp, K. W. (1963). Social costs of business enterprise. New York: Asia.
39.
Krogman, N. T. , & Darlington, J. D. (1996). Sociology and the environment: An analysis of journal coverage. The American Sociologist, 27(3), 39-55.
40.
Larson, J. (1992). Elegant technology: Economic prosperity from an environmental blueprint. Westwood, MA: Riverdale.
41.
Marx, K. (1981). Capital, Vol. 3. New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1894)
42.
Metha, M. D. , & Ouellet, E. (Eds.). (1995). Environmental sociology: Theory and practice. North York, Canada: Captus.
43.
Murphy, R. (1994). Rationality and nature: A sociological inquiry into a changing relationship. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44.
Murphy, R. (1996). Sociology and nature: Social action in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
45.
O’Connor, J. (1988). Capitalism, nature and socialism: A theoretical introduction. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 1(1), 11-23.
46.
Redclift, M. , & Woodgate, G. (Eds.). (1997). The international handbook of environmental sociology. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
47.
Saram, P. A. (1994). Gender and stratification in Veblen’s economic sociology. California Sociologist, 17, 59-79.
48.
Schnaiberg, A. (1975). Social synthesis of the societal-environmental dialectic: The role of distributional impacts. Social Science Quarterly, 56, 5-20.
49.
Schnaiberg, A. (1980). The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
Schnaiberg, A. , & Gould, K. A. (1994). Environment and society: The enduring conflict. New York: St. Martin’s.
51.
Solomon, C. (1999, November 22). “Leisure Class” author/critic may have been on the money. The Seattle Times, p. E1-E1.
52.
Sweezy, P. M. (1958). Veblen on American capitalism. In D. F. Dowd (Ed.), Thorstein Veblen: A critical reappraisal (pp. 177-197). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
Szlajfer, H. (1984). Waste, Marxian theory, and monopoly capital: Toward a new synthesis. In J. B. Foster & H. Szlajfer (Eds.), The faltering economy: The problem of accumulation (pp. 297-321). New York: Monthly Review Press.
54.
Tilman, R. (1991). Thorstein Veblen and his critics, 1891-1963: Conservative, liberal, and radical perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55.
Tyler, S. R. (1999). Policy implications of natural resource conflict. In D. Buckles (Ed.), Cultivating peace: Conflict and collaboration in natural resource management (pp. 263-280). Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
56.
Vaillancourt, J. (1995). Sociology of the environment: From human ecology to ecosociology. In M. D. Metha & E. Ouellet (Eds.), Environmental sociology: Theory and practice (pp. 3-32). North York, Canada: Captus.
57.
Vaughn, G. F. (1999). Veblen’s possible influence on the New Deal Land-Utilization Program as evidenced by his student Claud Franklin Clayton. Journal of Economic Issues, 33(3), 713-727.
58.
Veblen, T. B. (1898). The instinct of workmanship and the irksomeness of labor. American Journal of Sociology, 4(2), 187-201.
59.
Veblen, T. B. (1904). The theory of business enterprise. New York: Scribner.
60.
Veblen, T. B. (1933). The engineers and the price system. New York: Viking. (Original work published 1921)
61.
Veblen, T. B. (1967a). Absentee ownership and business enterprise in recent times: The case of America. Boston: Beacon. (Original work published 1923)
62.
Veblen, T. B. (1967b). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions.New York: Funk & Wagnalls. (Original work published 1899)
63.
Veblen, T. B. (1969). The vested interests and the common man. New York: Capricorn. (Original work published 1919)
64.
Veblen, T. B. (1990). The place of science in modern civilisation and other essays.New York: Huebsch. (Original work published 1919)
65.
Vecsey, C. (1980). American Indian environmental religions. In C. Vecsey & R. W. Venables (Eds.), American Indian environments: Ecological issues in Native American history (pp. 1-37). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
