The study explored how 125 older patients and 92 next of kin experienced and assessed continuity in long-term home health care. Data were collected by means of structured interviews. A majority of the patients indicated that having a high number of health care personnel involved in their care was not problematic. For patients, informed and skilled health personnel along with knowing the visiting personnel may compensate for a high number of personnel. For next of kin, accepting a high number of personnel was related to the carers being informed about the patient’s situation. This study indicates that, in terms of patient satisfaction, the overall quality of care is more important than the number of people providing the care.
HammarTRissanenPPersäläM-L.Home-care clients’ need for help, and use and costs of services. Eur J Ageing. 2008;5:147-160.
2.
HermansenÅ. Pleie- og omsorgssektoren i de nordiske land [Health Care Sector in the Nordic Countries]. Oslo, Norway: Fafo; 2011.
3.
World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe. Home Care in Europe: The Solid Facts (TarriconeRTsourosAD, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, eds.). Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe; 2008.
4.
RomørenTITorjesenDOLandmarkB.Promoting coordination in Norwegian health care (Coordination reform). Int J Care. 2011;11:e127.
5.
European Commission. Long-Term Care in the European Union. Brussels; European Commission; 2008.
6.
Word Health Organization Europe. The Solid Facts: Home Care in Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark: Word Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2008.
7.
DaleBSævareidHIKirkevoldMSöderhamnO.Older home-living patients’ perceptions of received home nursing and family care. Nordic Nurs Res. 2011;1:219-234.
8.
Ministry of Health and Care Services. Forskrift om kvalitet i pleie- og omsorgstjenestene for tjenesteyting etter lov av 19. november 1982 nr. 66 om helsetjenesten i kommunene og etter lov av 13. desember 1991 nr. 81 om sosiale tjenester m.v [Regulation of Quality of Care in Health and Social Services Regulated in the Municipal Health Care Act and the Social Health Care Act]. Oslo: Ministry of Health and Care Services; 2003.
9.
GjevjonELREikaKHRomørenTILandmarkBF. Measuring interpersonal continuity in high-frequency home health care services. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(3):553-563.
10.
WaibelSHenaoDAllerMBVargasIVázquezML.What do we know about patients’ perceptions of continuity of care? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24:39-48.
11.
ParkerGCordenAHeatonJ.Experiences of and influences on continuity of care for service users and carers: synthesis of evidence from a research programme. Health Soc Care Community. 2011;19:576-601.
12.
HeatonJCordenAParkerG.“Continuity of care”: a critical interpretive synthesis of how the concept was elaborated by a national research programme. Int J Integr Care. 2012;e12.
13.
ByrneKFrazeeKSims-GouldJMartin-MatthewsA.Valuing the older person in the context of delivery and receipt of home support: client perspectives. J Appl Gerontol. 2012;31(3):377-401.
14.
FreemanGK.Progress with relationship continuity 2012, a British perspective. Int J Care. 2012;12:e128.
15.
MoeAHellzénOEnmarkerI.The meaning of receiving help from home nursing care. Nurs Ethics. 2013;20:737-747. doi:10.1177/0969733013478959.
16.
TønnessenSFørdeRNortvedtP.Fair nursing care when resources are limited: the role of patients and family members in Norwegian home-based services. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2009;10(4):276-284.
17.
GjevjonELRRomørenTIKjøsBØHellesøR. Continuity of care in home health-care practice: two management paradoxes. J Nurs Manag. 2013;21:182-190.
18.
SharmanZMcLarenATCohenMOstryA.“We only own the hours”: discontinuity of care in the British Columbia home support system. Can J Aging. 2008;27:89-99.
19.
ReidRJHaggertyJMcKendryR.Defusing the Confusion: Concepts and Measures of Continuity of Health Care. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation; 2002.
20.
HaggertyJLReidRJFreemanGStarfieldBAdairCEMcKendryR.Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327:1219.
21.
WoodwardCAAbelsonJTedfordSHutchisonB.What is important to continuity in home care? Perspectives of key stakeholders. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:177-192.
22.
AttreeM.Patients’ and relatives’ experiences and perspectives of “good” and “not so good” quality care. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33:456-466.
23.
HellesøRLorensenM.Inter-organizational continuity of care and the electronic patient record: a concept development. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005;42:807-822.
24.
SaultzJW.Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1:134-143.
25.
RussellDRosatiRJPengTRBarrónYAndreopoulosE.Continuity in the provider of home health aide services and the likelihood of patient improvement in activities of daily living. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2013;25:6-12.
26.
RussellDRosatiRJRosenfeldPMarrenJM.Continuity in home health care: is consistency in nursing personnel associated with better patient outcomes?J Healthc Qual. 2011;33:33-39.
27.
PolitDFBeckCT.Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2012.
HaraldsenG.Spørreskjemametodikk: etter kokebokmetoden [Survey Methodology]. Oslo, Norway: Ad Notam Gyldendal; 1999.
30.
CohenJ.Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213-220.
31.
AltmanDG.Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: CRC Press; 1991.
32.
MantheyM.The 40th anniversary of primary nursing: setting the record straight. Creat Nurs. 2009;15:36-38.
33.
HansenTSlagsvoldB.The age and subjective well-being paradox revisited: a multidimensional perspective. Nor Epidemiol. 2012;22:187-195.
34.
Bing-JonssonPCBjørkITHofossDKirkevoldMFossC. Competence in advanced older people nursing: development of “nursing older people—competence evaluation tool.”Int J Older People Nurs. 2015;10:59-72.
