The purpose of this Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Theory of Nursing guided project was to extend a program evaluation project to examine the effects of three different approaches to home health care diabetes care on patient self-care behaviors. Group 1 (n = 64) received an experimental Diabetes Disease Management Program, group 2 (n = 167) received a Diabetes Learning Collaborative program, and group 3 (n = 132) received standard diabetes home care. No statistically significant group differences were found for self-care behaviors. Statistically significant associations in group 2 between emergent care and patients who met American Diabetes Association criteria for glucose control regarding discharge management of injectable medication management were found. A significant clinical finding was that 46% of patients (n = 117) did not meet the glucose criteria.
Centers for Disease Control. National Diabetes Fact Sheet. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/pdf/ndfs_2011.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2011.
2.
Centers for disease Control. National Health Statistics Report: Home Health Care and Discharged Hospice Care Patients: United States, 2000 and 2007. Hyattsville, Md: Author. 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr038.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2011
BerlowitzDRGlickmanMAshAS.FriedmanRHickeyECKaderB. Hypertension management in patients with diabetes: The need for more aggressive therapy. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:355-359.
5.
SorensenSEngelgauMThompsonT. CDC cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic, intensified hypertension control, and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes. JAMA. 2002;287:2542-2551.
6.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-986.
7.
MazzoneT. Hyperglyaemia and coronary heart disease: The Meta picture. The Lancet. 2009;373:1737-1738.
8.
RayKKSeshasaiSRWijesuriyaS. Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular disease outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The Lancet. 2000;373:1765-1772.
9.
United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). The Lancet. 1998;352:837-853.
10.
National Institutes of Health. Most people with diabetes do not meet treatment goals. NIH News. 2004. Available at: http://www.nih.gov/news/pr/jan2004/niddk-20.htm. Accessed August 3, 2011.
11.
CheungBMOngKLChernySSShamPCTsoAWLamKS. Diabetes prevalence and therapeutic target achievement in the United States, 1999 to 2006. Am J Med. 2009;122:443-453.
DaltonJMGarveyJSamiaLW. Evaluation of a diabetes disease management home care program. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2006;18:272-285.
14.
American Diabetes Association (ADA). Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus . Diabetes Care. 2005, 28(supplement 1), S4-S36.
15.
FreyMADenyesMJ. Health and illness self-care in adolescents with IDDM: A test of Orem’s theory. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1989;12:67-75.
16.
WangC. The cross-cultural applicability of Orem’s conceptual framework. J Cult Divers. 1997;4:44-48.
17.
WangCAbbottJ. Development of a community-based diabetes and hypertension preventative program. Public Health Nurs. 1998;15:406-414.
18.
WangCFenskeM. Self-care with non-insulin–dependent diabetes mellitus: Influence of family and friends. Diabetes Educ. 1996;22:465-470.
19.
MooreJBPichlerVH. Measurement of Orem’s basic conditioning factors: A review of the research. Nurs Sci Q. 2000;13:137-142.
20.
SousaVDZauszniewskiJAMusilCMMcDonaldPEMilliganSE. Testing a conceptual framework for diabetes self-care management. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2004;18:293-316.
21.
SousaVDZauszniewskiJAMusilCMPrice-LeaPJDavisSA. Relationships among self-care agency, self-efficacy, self-care, and glycemic control. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2005;19:217-230.
22.
FaulknerMSChangL. Family Influence on self care, quality of life, and metabolic control in school-age children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Nurs. 2007;22:59-68.
23.
BensonG. (2010). The role of disease management in diabetes care. Diabetes Spectrum. 2010;23:116-118.
24.
HuffmanMH. Disease management: A new and exciting opportunity in home Healthcare. Home Healthc Nurse. 2005;23:290-298.
25.
Care Continuum Alliance. Population Health: Care Continuum Alliance Definition of Disease Management. Available at: http://www.carecontinuum.org/dm_definition.asp. Accessed August 24, 2011.
26.
HeckingerEChappellHDownesDFitznerK. Diabetes management: A mid-decade evolution toward patient safety. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2006;18: 178-185.
27.
BorenSAFitxnerKAPanhalkerPSSpeckerJE. Costs and benefits with diabetes education: A review of the literature. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:72-96.
28.
NorrisSLNicholsPJCaspersonCJ. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:15-38
29.
KnightKBadamgaravEHenningJM. A systematic review of diabetes disease management programs. Am J Manag Care. 2005;11:242-250.
30.
SiderovJShullRTomcavageJGirolamiSLawtonNHarrisR. Does diabetes disease management save money and improve outcomes?Diabetes Care. 2002;25:684-689.
31.
ClarkA. Improving the delivery of care for diabetes patients with a collaborative model. Home Healthc Nurse. 2005;23: 177-182.
32.
PolitDFBeckCT. Nursing Research: Creating and Assessing Evidence For Nursing Practice. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008.
33.
National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Your Guide to Diabetes: type 1 and type 2 (No.02-4016). Bethesda, Md: U.S. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. 2002.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. OASIS Data Set. Baltimore, Md: Author. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/OASIS/046_Dataset.asp. Accessed July 14, 2010.
37.
ShaughnessyPCrislerK. Outcome Based Quality Improvement: A Manual for Home Care Agencies on How to Use Outcomes. Wash.: National Association of Home Care. 1995.
38.
ShaughnessyPHittleDFCrislerK. Improving patient outcomes of home health care: Findings from two demonstration trials of outcome-based quality improvement. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1354-1364.
MadiganEAFortinskyRH. Interrater reliability of outcomes and assessment information set: Results from the field. Gerontologist. 2004;44:689-692.
41.
HittleDFShaughnessyPWCrislerKS. A study of reliability and burden of home health assessment using OASIS. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2003;22:43-63.
42.
KinatukaraSRosatiRJHuangL. Assessment of OASIS reliability and validity using several methodological approaches. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2005;24:23-49.
43.
ShewPASandersSLArthurNCBushKW. OASIS inter-rater reliability and reimbursement. Home Healthc Nurse. 2010; 28:31-36.
44.
Tullai-McGuinnessSMadiganEAFortinskyRH. Validity testing the outcomes and assessment information set (OASIS). Home Health Care Serv Q. 2009;28:45-47.
45.
SchneiderJSBarkauskasVKeenanG. Evaluating home health nursing outcomes with OASIS and NOC. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40:76-82.
46.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. OASIS Regulations: June 18, 1999 Regulations. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/OASIS/03_Regulations.asp. Accessed August 24, 2011.
47.
SousaVDZauszniewskiJAZellerRANeeseJB. (2008). Factor analysis of the appraisal of self care agency scale in American adults with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 2008; 34:98-108.
48.
SousaVDHartmanSWMillerEHCarrollMA. New measures of diabetes self care agency, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes self-management for insulin-treated individuals with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:1305-1312.
49.
SousaVDZauszniewskiJA. Toward a theory of diabetes self-care management. The Journal of Theory Construction & Testing. 2005;9:61-67.
