Resources are needed throughout the process of implementing evidence-based practice from the initial search for evidence through the evaluation of outcomes. Administrative support is a critical resource for any change to occur and be maintained. This article describes the resources that are available and that may be useful at different phases of the evidence-based practice process. For example, to find prepared literature syntheses and guidelines, nurses need either a medical librarian or expertise in using computerized bibliographic databases. Tools are described for use in (a) critical appraisal of literature and guidelines and (b) evaluation of the context in which a practice change is being considered.
American Nurses Association. (2004). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Berwick, D. M. (2003). Disseminating innovations in health care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(15), 1969-1975.
3.
Brown, S. J. (1999). Knowledge for health care practice: A guide to using research evidence. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.
4.
Cochrane, A. L. (1999). Effectiveness & efficiency: Random reflections on health services. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
5.
Conn, V. S., Isaramalai, S. A., Rath, S., Jantaratkupt, P., Wadhawan, R., & Dash, Y. (2003). Beyond MEDLINE for literature searches. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 35(2), 177-182.
6.
Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Cooper, H. M., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage.
8.
Craig, J. V., & Smyth, R. L. (2002). The evidence-based practice manual for nurses. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone.
9.
Dash, Y. (2003). Beyond MEDLINE for literature searches. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 3, 177-182.
10.
Davies, B., & Logan, J. (2003). Reading research: A user-friendly guide for nurses and other health professionals (3rd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Elsevier Canada.
11.
Dawes, M. (1999). Preface. In M. Dawes, P. T. Davies, J. Mant, K. Seers, & R. Snowball (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A primer for health care professionals (pp. ix-x). Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone.
12.
Dawes, M., Davies, P., Gray, A., Mant, J., Seers, K., & Snowball, R. (1999). Evidence-based practice: A primer for health care professionals. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone.
13.
Dixon, L. A. (2002). A quiver full of arrows: Recommended web-based tutorials for PubMed, PowerPoint, Ovid MEDLINE, and FrontPage. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 21, 55-64.
14.
Donald, A., & Greenhalgh, T. (1999). Evidence based medicine workbook. London: BMJ.
15.
Earlam, S., Brecker, N., & Vaughan, B. (2000). Cascading evidence: Achieving skills in evidence-based medicine. Philadelphia: Adis International.
16.
Field, M. J., & Lohr, K. N. (Eds.). (1992). Guidelines for clinical practice: From development to use. Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17.
Geyman, J. P., Deyo, R. A., & Ramsey, S. C. (2000). Evidence-based clinical practice: Concepts and approaches. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
18.
Greenhalgh, T. (1997). How to read a paper: The basics of evidence based medicine. London: BMJ.
19.
Guyatt, G., & Rennie, D. (2002). Users’ guides to the medical literature: Essentials of evidence-based clinical practice. Chicago: AMA Press.
20.
Haines, A., & Donald, A. (2001). Getting research findings into practice. London: BMJ.
21.
Hamer, S., & Collinson, G. (1999). Achieving evidence-based practice: A handbook for practitioners. Philadelphia: Bailliere Tindall.
22.
Horsley, J., Crane, J., Crabtree, M., & Wood, D. (1983). Using research to improve nursing practice: A guide. New York: Grune & Stratton.
23.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
24.
Katz, D. L. (2001). Clinical epidemiology & evidence-based medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Kirchhoff, K. T. (2003, October). State-of-the-science of translation research: From demonstration projects to intervention testing. Paper presented at the Advancing Quality Care Through Translation Research meeting, Coralville, IA.
26.
Kitson, A., Harvey, G., & McCormack, B. (1998). Enabling the implementation of evidence-based practice: A conceptual framework. Quality in Health Care, 7, 149-158.
27.
Kleinpell, R. (2001). Outcome assessment in advanced practice nursing. New York: Springer.
28.
Lohr, K. N., Eleazer, K., & Mauskopf, J. (1998). Health policy issues and applications for evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines. Health Policy, 46, 1-19.
29.
Matthews, E. J., Edwards, A. G., Barket, J., Bloor, M., Covey, J., Hood, K., et al. (1999). Efficient literature searching in diffuse topics: Lessons from a systematic review of research on communicating risk to patients in primary care. Health Libraries Review, 16, 112-120.
30.
Morrisey, L. J., & DeBourgh, G. A. (2001). Finding evidence: Refining literature searching skills for the advanced practice nurse. AACN Clinical Issues, 12, 560-577.
31.
Mulrow, C., & Cook, D. (1998). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians.
32.
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario. (2002). Toolkit: Implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Retrieved January 4, 2005, at www.rnao.org/bestpractices/PDF/BPG_Toolkit.pdf
33.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
34.
Rutledge, D. N., Mooney, K. H., Grant, M., & Eaton, L. (2004). Implementation and refinement of a research utilization course for oncology nurses. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31(1), 121-126.
35.
Rycroft-Malone, J., Kitson, A., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Seers, K., Titchen, A., et al. (2002). Ingredients for change: Revisiting a conceptual framework. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 11, 174-180.
36.
Sacket, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. London: Harcourt Publishers.
37.
Savaie, I., Helmer, D., Green, C. J., & Kazanjian, A. (2003). Beyond Medline: Reducing bias through extended systematic review search. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 19, 168-178.
38.
Schulmeister, L., & Vrabel, M. (2002). Searching for information for presentations and publications. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 16, 79-84.
39.
Shekelle, P. G., Ortiz, E., Rhodes, S., Morton, S., Eccles, M. P., Grimshaw, J. M., et al. (2001). The validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: How quickly do guidelines go out-of-date?Journal of American Medical Association, 286, 1461-1467.
40.
Southern California Evidence-Based Practice Center/RAND & Vickrey, B. G. (1999, February). Prevention and management of urinary tract infections in paralyzed persons (AHCPR Pub. No. 99-E008). Rockville MD: Agency for Health Care Policy & Research. (Available at www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/utisumm.htm)
41.
Stetler, C. B., Morsi, D., Rucki, S., Broughton, S., Corrigan, B., Fitzgerald, J., et al. (1998). Utilization-focused integrative reviews in a nursing service. Applied Nursing Research, 11(4), 195-206.
42.
Trinder, L., & Reynolds, S. (2000). Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.
43.
Verhey, M. P., Levy, J. R., & Schmidt, R. (1998). Information RN. Glendale, CA: Cinahl Information Systems.
