American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1998). Guidelines for hearing aid fitting for adults. Amer J Audiol7:5–13.
2.
ANSI S3.22-1996American National Standard Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics. New York: American National Standards Institute.
3.
ANSI S3.21-1992American National Standard Method for Manual Pure-Tone Threshold Audiometry. New York: American National Standards Institute.
4.
ANSI S3.42-1992American National Standard Testing Hearing Aids with a Broad-Band Noise Signal. New York: American National Standards Institute.
5.
ANSI S3.5-1997American National Standard Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. New York: American National Standards Institute.
BeauchaineKLDonaghyKF. (1996). Amplification selection considerations in the pediatric population. In: BessFGravelJTharpeAM. (eds) Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville: Bill Wilkerson Press, 145–160.
8.
CarlsonE. (1974). Smoothing the hearing aid frequency response. J Audio Eng Soc22:426–429.
9.
ChingTYCDillonHByrneD. (1998). Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high frequency amplification. J Acoust Soc Amer103:1128–1140.
10.
CoxRGilmoreC. (1986). Damping the hearing aid frequency response: Effects on speech clarity and preferred listening level. J Speech Hear Res29:357–365.
11.
DavisLADavidsonSA. (1996). Preference for and performance with damped and undamped hearing aids by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res39:483–493.
FeiginJAKopunJGStelmachowiczPGGorgaMP. (1989). Probe microphone measures of ear canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. Ear Hear10:254–258.
14.
GerlingIJBoesterKYuJH. (1997). The transient effect of cerumen on the external ear resonance. Poster presented at the annual conference of the American Academy of Audiology, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
15.
GinsburgHOpperS. (1969). Piaget's Theory of Intellectual Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
Hedley-WilliamsATharpeAMBessFH. (1996). Fitting hearing aids in the pediatric population: A survey of practice procedures. In: BessFHGravelJSTharpeAM. (eds) Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, 107–122.
HawkinsDBMontgomeryAAProsekRAWaldenBE. (1987). Examination of two issues concerning functional gain measurements. J Speech Hear Dis52:56–63.
19.
HoganC. (1996). High frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing impaired listeners. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Syracuse University.
20.
HoganCATurnerCW. (1998). High-frequency audibility: benefits for the hearing impaired listeners. Submitted to the J Acoust Soc Amer..
21.
HumesLE. (1991). Understanding the speech understanding problems of the hearing impaired. J Amer Acad Audiol2:59–69.
22.
HumesLEHipskindNMBlockMG. (1988). Insertion gain measured with three probe mic systems. Ear Hear9:108–112.
23.
HumesLEKirnEU. (1990). The reliability of functional gain. J Speech Hear Dis55:193–197.
24.
JergerJThelinJ. (1968). Effects of electroacoustic characteristics of hearing aids on speech understanding. Bull Prosth Res: 157–197.
25.
KawellMEKopunJGStelmachowiczPG. (1988). Loudness discomfort levels in children. Ear Hear9:133–136.
26.
KillionMCMuellerHGPavlovicCVHumesLE. (1993). A is for audibility. Hear J46(4):29.
27.
KrugerB. (1987). An update on the external ear resonance in infants and young children. Ear Hear8:333–336.
28.
MahonW. (1987). Hearing care for infants and children. Hear J40(9):7–10.
29.
MacphersonBJElfenbeinJLSchumRLBentlerRA. (1991). Thresholds of discomfort in young children. Ear Hear12(3):184–190.
30.
MatkinND. (1987). Hearing instruments for children: Premises for selecting and fitting. Hear Instrum38(9):14–16.
31.
MoodieKSSeewaldRCSinclairST. (1994). Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing aid performance in young children. Amer J Audiol3:23–31.
32.
MorylCLDanhauerJLDiBartolomeoJR. (1992). Real ear unaided responses in ears with tympanic membrane perforations. J Amer Acad of Audiol3:60–65.
33.
MuellerHGGrimesA. (1983). Speech audiometry for hearing aid selection. Sem Hear4(3): 255–272.
34.
MuellerHGKillionMC. (1990). An easy method for calculating the Articulation Index. Hear J43(9):14–17.
35.
MuellerHGSweetowRW. (1987). A clinical comparison of probe microphone systems. Hear Instrum38:19–21, 57.
36.
BarlowNelson NLAuslanderMCRinesDStelmachowiczPG. (1988). Probe tube microphone measures in hearing-impaired children and adults. Ear Hear9:243–247.
37.
NorthernJLDownsMP. (1991). Hearing in Children. Baltimore, MD: Waverly Press, 17.
38.
PascoeD. (1998). Clinical measurements of the auditory dynamic range and their relation to formulae for hearing aid gain. In: JensenJH (ed) Hearing Aid Fitting: Theoretical and Practical Views. Copenhagen: Stougaard Jensen, 129–154.
39.
PavlovicC. (1991). Speech recognition and five articulation indexes. Hear Instrum42(9):20–24.
40.
Pediatric Working Group of the Conference on Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. (1996). Amplification for Infants and Children with Hearing Loss. Amer J Audiol5: 53–68.
41.
SeewaldRCCornelisseLERamjiKSinclairSTMoodieKSJamiesonDG. (1997). DSL 4.1 for Windows: A software implementation for fitting linear gain and wide-dynamic-range compression hearing instruments.
42.
SeewaldRCHudsonSPGagneJ-PZeliskoDLC. (1992). Comparison of two procedures for estimating the sensation level of amplified speech. Ear Hear13:142–149.
43.
SeewaldRCRamjiKVSinclairSTMoodieKSJamiesonDG. (1993). Computer-assisted Implementation of the Desired Sensation Level Method for Electroacoustic Selection and Fitting in Children. User's Manual. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.
44.
ShoreIBilgerRCHirshIJ. (1960). Hearing aid evaluation: Reliability of repeated measurements. J Speech Hear Dis25(2):152–170.
45.
StelmachowiczPLewisDKalbererACreutzT. (1994). Situational Hearing Aid Response Profile (SHARP, Version 2.0). Users Manual.
46.
StudebakerGASherbecoeRL. (1993). Frequency-importance functions for speech recognition. In Stude-BakerGAHochbergI. (eds). Acoustical Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Performance, 2nd ed.Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 185–204.
47.
TurnerCWCummingsKJ. (1998). Speech audibility for high-frequency hearing loss listeners. Submitted to Amer J Audiol: A Journal of Clinical Practice.
48.
WaldenBESchwartzDMWilliamsDLHolum-HardegenLLCrowleyJM. (1983). Test of the assumptions underlying comparative hearing aid evaluations. J Speech Hear Dis48:264–273.