American National Standards Institute. (1989). American National Standard for Specifications of Audiometers. (ANSI S3.6–1989). New York: ANSI.
2.
CornelisseLSeewaldRJamiesonD. (1995). The input/output (i/o) formula: A theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acous Soc Amer97(3): 1854–1864.
3.
CoxR. (1994). Using loudness data for hearing aid selection: The IHAFF approach. Hear J48(2): 10–44.
4.
CoxRAlexanderG. (1995). The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear16:176–186.
5.
DolanT. (1991). High frequency biasing in measuring AGC responses. Hear Instrum, March, 28–46.
6.
GittlesT.NiquetteP. (1995). Fig6 in Ten. Hear Rev, Nov-Dec, 2:10, 28–30.
7.
HawkinsDWaldenBMontgomeryAProsekR. (1987). Description and validation of a LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. Ear Hear8:162–169.
8.
HellmanRMeiselmanC. (1993). Rate of loudness growth for pure tones in normal and impaired hearing. J Acous Soc Amer93:966–975.
9.
KillionM. (1994). Fig6.exe software: Hearing aid fitting targets for 40, 65 and 95 dB SPL inputs (version 1.01, rev D). Etymotic Research, Elk Grove Village, IL.
10.
KillionM. (1996). Talking hair cells: What they have to say about hearing aids. In BerlinC. (Ed) Hair Cells and Hearing Loss. Singular Press, San Diego.
11.
KillionMFikret-PasaS. (1993). The 3 types of sensorineural hearing loss: Loudness and intelligibility considerations. Hear J46(11)1–4.
LippmannRBraidaLDurlachN. (1981). Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acous Soc Amer53:1646–1657.
14.
LyregaardP. (1988). POGO and the theory behind. In JensonJ, ed. Hearing aid fitting: Theoretical and practical views. Proceedings of the 13th Danavox symposium. Copenhagen, Danavox, 81–96.
15.
MuellerGBrightK. (1994). Selection and verification of maximum output. In: ValenteM. (ed.) Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. Chapter 3. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.New York, pp 38–63.
16.
SeewaldR. C.CornelisseL. E.RamjiK. V.SinclairS. T.MoodieK. S.JamiesonD. G. (1997). DSL 4.1 for windows: A software implementation of the desired sensation level (DSL[i/o]) method for fitting linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing instruments. London, Ont: Hearing Healthcare Research Unit, Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Western Ontario.
17.
SeewaldRRamjiKSinclairSMoodieKJamiesonD. (1993). A computer assisted implementation of the desired sensation level method for electroacoustic selection and fitting in children. University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
18.
Starkey Laboratories (1997). Professional Fitting System, Operations Manual. Starkey Laboratories, Inc., Eden Prairie, MN.
19.
StelmachowiczPLewisDSeewaldRHawkinsD. (1990). Complex and pure-tone signals in the evaluation of hearing-aid characteristics. J Speech Hear Res33:380–385.
20.
ValenteMVan VlietD. (1997). The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) protocol. Trends in Amplification2:1. Woodland Publications Inc., New York.