American National Standards Institute. (1992). American National Standard Testing Hearing Aids with a Broad-Band Noise Signal. ANSI S3.42. New York: American National Standards Institute.
2.
BentlerRAPavlovicCV. (1989). Transfer functions and correction factors used in hearing aid evaluation and research. Ear Hear10(1): 58–63.
3.
BilgerRNeutzelJRabinowitzJRzeczkowskiC. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res27:32–48.
4.
CoxRMAlexanderGC. (1992). Maturation of hearing aid benefit: Objective and subjective measurements. Ear Hear13(3): 131–141.
5.
CoxRMGilmoreC. (1990). Development of the profile of hearing aid performance. J Speech Hear Res33:343–357.
6.
CornelisseLESeewaldRCJamiesonDG. (1994). Wide-dynamic range compression hearing aids: The DSL[i/o] approach. Hear J47(10): 23–26.
7.
CornelisseLESeewaldRCJamiesonDG. (1995). The input/output formula: A theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Amer97:1854–1864.
8.
FeiginJAKopunJGStelmachowiczPGGorgaMP. (1989). Probe-tube microphone measures of ear-canal sound pressure levels in infants and children. Ear Hear10(4): 254–258.
9.
GauthierEARapisardiDA. (1992). A threshold is a threshold is a threshold … or is it?Hear Instrum43(3): 26–27.
10.
HallJWChandlerD. (1994). Tympanometry in clinical audiology. In KatzJ (ed): Handbook of Clinical Audiology (Fourth Edition), Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins, 283–299.
11.
HawkinsDBCooperWAThompsonDJ. (1990). Comparisons among SPLs in Real Ears, 2 cm3 and 6 cm3 Couplers. J Amer Acad Audiol1:154–161.
12.
MartinHCMunroKJLangerDH. (1997). Real-ear to coupler differences in children with grommets. Brit J Audiol31:63–69.
13.
MoodieKS. (1996). A practical approach to hearing aid selection. BSA News18:6–8.
14.
MoodieKSSeewaldRCSinclairST. (1994). Procedure for predicting real-ear hearing aid performance in young children. Amer J Audiol3:23–31.
15.
MuellerHGBrightKE. (1994). Selection and verification of maximum output. In: ValenteM (ed): Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings, New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 38–63.
16.
ScollieSDSeewaldRCCornelisseLEJenstadLM. (1998). Validity and repeatability of level-independent HL to SPL transforms. Ear Hear19(5):407–413.
17.
SeewaldRC. (1995). The desired sensation level (DSL) method for hearing aid fitting in infants and children. Phonak Focus20, Stofa, Switzerland: Phonak A/G.
18.
SeewaldRC. (1997). Amplification: A child-centered approach. Hear J50(3):61.
19.
SeewaldRCMoodieKSSinclairSTCornelisseLE. (1996). Traditional and theoretical approaches to selecting amplification for infants and young children. In BessFHGravelJSTharpeAM (eds): Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits, Nashville: Bill Wilkerson Center Press, 161–191.
20.
SeewaldRCMoodieKSZeliskoDLC. (1993). Critique of current approaches to the selection and fitting of hearing aids. JSLPA Monogr Suppl. 1:29–38.
21.
SeewaldRCSinclairSTMoodieKS. (1994). Predictive accuracy of a procedure for electroacoustic fitting in young children. Poster presentation at The American Academy of Audiology Convention, Richmond VA, April.
22.
SinclairSTBeauchaineKLMoodieKSFeiginJASeewaldRCStelmachowiczPG. (1996). Repeatability of a real-ear-to-coupler-difference measurement as a function of age. Amer J Audiol5(3): 52–56.
SinclairSTSeewaldRCColeWA. (1996). A new real-ear fitting system: Because no two ears are alike. Hear Rev3(6): 46–48.
25.
StelmachowiczPGKopunJMaceALLewisDE. (1996). Measures of hearing aid gain for real speech. Ear Hear17(6): 520–527.
26.
WestwoodGBamfordJ. (1995). Probe-tube microphone measurements with very young infants: Real-ear to coupler differences and longitudinal changes in real-ear unaided response. Ear Hear16(3): 263–273.
27.
ZeliskoDLSeewaldRCWhitesideS. (1992). Comparing three procedures for predicting ear canal SPL at LDL. ASHA:34(10).
