AllenJBHallJLTengPS. (1990). Loudness growth in half octave bands (LOGB). A procedure for the assessment of loudness growth. J Acoust Soc Amer88:745–753.
2.
ByrneD. (1996). Hearing aid selection for the 1990s: Where to?J Amer Acad Audiol7:377–395.
3.
ByrneDDillonH. (1986). The National Acoustics Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear7:257–265.
4.
BryneDParkinsonANewallP. (1991). Modified hearing aid selection procedures for severe/profound hearing losses. In: StudebakerGABessFHBeckL (eds). The Vanderbilt Report II. York Press, Parkton, MD, 295–300.
5.
CoxRM. (1995). Using loudness data for hearing aid selection: The IHAFF approach. Hear J48(10): 39–44.
6.
GitlesTCNiquettePT. (1995). FIG6 in ten. Hear Rev2(10):28, 30.
7.
HawkinsDBNaidooSV. (1993). Comparison of sound quality and clarity with asymmetrical peal clipping and output limiting compression. J Amer Acad Audiol4:221–228.
8.
SeewaldRCCornelisseLERamjiKVSinclairSTMoodieKSJamiesonDG. (1997). DSL 4.1 for Windows: A Software Implementation of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL [i/o]) Method for Fitting Linear Gain and Wide Dynamic Range Compression Hearing Instruments. Hearing Healthcare Research Unit, Department of Communication Disorders, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario.
9.
SkafteMD. (1997). The 1996 hearing aid instrument market—the dispensers' perspective. Hear Rev4(3):8,12,16,18,22,24,26,28,31,32,34,36.
10.
ValenteMPottsLValenteM. (1997). Development of a clinical protocol in an attempt to improve user satisfaction with hearing aids. Sem Hear18(1): 19–28.
11.
ValenteMVan VlietD. (1997). The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) protocol. Trends Amp2(1): 1–30.