Examination of the Validity of Auditory Traits and Tests

Abstract

References

American National Standards Institute (1998, August). American National Standard Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms, S3.1-199x (draft). New York: American Institute of Physics.

American National Standards Institute (1986). Methods for Manual Pure-Tone Threshold Audiometry, S3.21-1986. New York: American Institute of Physics.

Arrindell WA , van der Ende J . An empirical test of the utility of the observations-to-variables ratio in factor and components analysis. App Psychol Meas 9:165-178, 1985.

Bagozzi RP . Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. J Res Pers 27:49-87, 1993.

Barrett PT , Kline P . The observation to variable ratio in factor analysis. Pers Study Group Behav 1:23-33, 1981.

Bentler PM . EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc., 1995.

Bentler RA , Kramer SE . Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear 21:37S-49S, 2000.

Blauert J . Spatial hearing: The psychophysics of human sound localization (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.

Byrne BM . Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 1994.

10.

Cattell RB . The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis. New York, NY: Plenum, 1978.

11.

Campbell DT , Fiske DW . Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56:81-105, 1959.

12.

Chmiel R , Jerger J . Some factors affecting assessment of hearing handicap in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 4:249-257, 1993.

13.

Coren S , Hakstian AR . The development and cross-validation of a self-report inventory to assess pure-tone threshold hearing sensitivity. J Speech Hear Res 35:921-928. 1992.

14.

Cox RM , Alexander GC , Gilmore C . Intelligibility of average talkers in typical listening environments. J Acoust Soc Am 81:1598-1608, 1987a.

15.

Cox RM , Alexander GC , Gilmore C . Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear Hear 8 (suppl): 119S-126S, 1987b.

16.

Cox RM , Alexander GC , Rivera I . Accuracy of audiometric test room simulations of three real-world listening environments. J Acoust Soc Am 90:764-772, 1991.

17.

Cox RM , Alexander GC , Gilmore C , Pusakulich KM . Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 9:198-207, 1988.

18.

Cox RM , Alexander GC , Gilmore C , Pusakulich KM . The Connected Speech Test version 3: Audiovisual administration. Ear Hear 10:29-32, 1989.

19.

Cox RM , Gilmore C . Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). J Speech Hear Res 33:343-357, 1990.

20.

Cox RM , Gilmore CG , Alexander GC . Comparison of two questionnaires for patient-assessed hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol 2:134-145, 1991.

21.

Cronbach LJ . Response sets and test validity. Educ Psychol Meas 6:475-494, 1946.

22.

Cronbach LJ , Meehl PE . Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull 52:281-302, 1955.

23.

Demorest ME , Walden BE . Psychometric principles in the selection, interpretation, and evaluation of communication self assessment inventories. J Speech Hear Disord 49:226-240, 1984.

24.

Erdman SA . Self-assessment: From research focus to research tool. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 27:67-90, 1994.

25.

Erdman SA , Demorest ME . Adjustment to hearing impairment II: Audiological and demographic correlates. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:123-136, 1998.

26.

Flamme GA , Cox RM , Alexander GC , Gray G . Local-ization disabilities in real-world situations. Poster presented at the 1999 American Academy of Audiology Annual Convention, Miami FL, 1999.

27.

Flamme GA . The relationships between direction and distance hearing and other auditory traits: A multitrait-multimethod evaluation. University Microfilms International. Publication number AAT 9967035, 2000.

28.

Gatehouse S . Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 15:30-49, 1994.

29.

Gatehouse S . Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services, some uses, users, and options. Trends Amplification 5:00-00, 2001.

30.

Good MD , Gilkey RH . Sound localization in noise: The effect of signal-to-noise ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 99:1108-1117, 1996.

31.

Guadagnoli E , Velicer WF . Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull 103:265-275, 1988.

32.

Hallberg LRM , Carlsson SG . Hearing impairment, coping and perceived hearing handicap in middle-aged sub-jects with acquired hearing loss. Br J Audiol 25:323-330, 1991.

33.

High WS , Fairbanks G , Glorig A . Scale for self assessment of hearing handicap. J Speech Hear Disord 29:215-230, 1964.

34.

Hu L , Bentler PM , Kano Y . Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychol Bull 112:351-362, 1992.

35.

Kalikow DN , Stevens KN , Elliot LL . Development of a test of speech intelligibility in Noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 61:1337-1351, 1977.

36.

Karlsson AK , Rosenhall U . Aural rehabilitation in the elderly: Supply of hearing aids related to measured need and self assessed hearing problems. Scand Audiol 27:153-160, 1998.

37.

Kramer SE , Kapteyn TS , Festen JM , Tobi H . Factors in subjective hearing disability. Audiology 34:311-320, 1995.

38.

Lorenzi C , Gatehouse S , Lever C . Sound localization in normal-hearing listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 105:1-11, 1999a.

39.

Lorenzi C , Gatehouse S , Lever C . Sound localization in hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 105:3454-3463, 1999b.

40.

Lormore KA , Stephens SDG . Use of the open-ended questionnaire with patients and their significant others. Br J Audiol 28:81-89, 1994.

41.

Long JS . Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A Preface to LIS-REL (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 33). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications, 1983.

42.

Lutman ME , Brown EJ , Coles RRA . Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure-tone threshold, age, sex and type of hearing loss. Br J Audiol 21:45-58, 1987.

43.

MacCallum RC , Browne MW , Sugawara HM . Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Meth 1:130-149, 1996.

44.

MacCallum RC , Widaman KF , Zhang S , Hong S . Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Meth 4:84-99, 1999.

45.

Marcus-Bernstein C . Audiologic and nonaudiologic correlates of hearing handicap in black elderly. J Speech Hear Res 29:301-312, 1986.

46.

Newman CW , Weinstein BE . Judgments of perceived hearing handicap by hearing-impaired elderly men and their spouses. J Acad Rehab Audiol 19:109-115, 1986.

47.

Newman CW , Weinstein BE , Jacobson GP , Hug GA . The hearing handicap inventory for adults: Psychometric adequacy and audiometric correlates. Ear Hear 11:430-433, 1990.

48.

Nilsson M , Soli SD , Sullivan JA . Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 95:1085-1099, 1994.

49.

Noble WG , Atherley GRC . The Hearing Measure Scale: A questionnaire for the assessment of auditory disability. J Aud Res 10:229-250, 1970.

50.

Noble W , Byrne D , Ter Horst K . Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 102:2343-2352, 1997.

51.

Noble W , Ter-Horst K , Byrne D . Disabilities and handicaps associated with impaired auditory localization. J Am Acad Audiol 6:129-140, 1995.

52.

Nunnally JC . Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1978.

53.

Nunnally JC , Bernstein IH . Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994.

54.

O'Mahoney CF , Stephens SDG , Cadge BA . Who prompts patients to consult about hearing loss? Br J Audiol 30:153-158, 1996.

55.

Pearsons KS , Bennett RL , Fidell S . Speech levels in various noise environments (EPA Report No. 600/1-77-025). Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1977.

56.

Plomp R . Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 63:533-549, 1978.

57.

Ringdahl A , Eriksson-Mangold M , Anderson G . Psychometric evaluation of the Gothenburg profile for measurement of experienced hearing disability and handicap: Applications with new hearing aid candidates and experienced hearing aid users. Br J Audiol 32:375-385, 1998.

58.

Rosenthal R , Rosnow RL . Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.

59.

Schow RL , Nerbonne MA . Assessment of hearing handicap by nursing home residents and staff. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 10:2-12, 1977.

60.

Schow RL , Nerbonne MA . Hearing Handicap and Denver scales: Applications, categories, interpretation. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 13:66-77, 1980.

61.

Schow RL , Nerbonne MA . Communication screening profile: Use with elderly clients. Ear Hear 3:135-147, 1982.

62.

Speaks C , Jerger J , Trammell J . Measurement of hearing handicap. J Speech Hear Res 13:768-776, 1970.

63.

Stephens D , France L , Lormore K . Effects of hearing impairment on the patient's family and friends. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 115:165-167, 1995.

64.

Studebaker GA . A “rationalized” arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 28:455-462, 1985.

65.

Swan IRC , Gatehouse S . Factors influencing consultation for management of hearing disability. Br J Audiol 24:155-160, 1990.

66.

Walden BE , Demorest ME , Hepler EL . Self-report approach to assessing benefit derived from amplification. J Speech Hear Res 27:49-56, 1984.

67.

Widaman KF . Multitrait-multimethod models in aging research. Exp Aging Res 18:185-201, 1992.

68.

Wightman FL , Kistler DJ . Factors affecting the relative salience or sound localization cues. In: Gilkey RH , Anderson TR (eds): Binaural and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 1-24, 1997.

69.

Woodcock RW . Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc., 1973.