SmithBRamadossTD’AmarioV, et al. Utilization and perception of generative artificial intelligence by medical students in residency applications. J Investig Med2025; 73(4): 338–44.
2.
JonesDPittmanJRJr.ManningKD.Ten steps for writing an exceptional personal statement. J Grad Med Educ2022; 14(5): 522–525.
3.
KhojastehLKafipourRPakdelF, et al. Empowering medical students with AI writing co-pilots: design and validation of AI self-assessment toolkit. BMC Med Educ2025; 25(1): 159.
4.
SwieckiZKhosraviHChenG, et al. Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence. Comput Educ: Artif Intell2022; 3: 100075.
5.
JohnstoneREVallejoMCZakowskiM.Improving residency applicant personal statements by decreasing hired contractor involvement. J Grad Med Educ2022; 14(5): 526–528.
6.
ChenJXBoweSDengF.Residency applications in the era of generative artificial intelligence. J Grad Med Educ2024; 16(3): 254–256.
7.
Gottlieb-SmithRXixisKMartindaleJM, et al. Artificial intelligence in residency recruitment: impact on equity. Neurol Educ2024; 3(3): e200150.
8.
SarrafDVasiliuVImbermanB, et al. Use of artificial intelligence for gender bias analysis in letters of recommendation for general surgery residency candidates. Am J Surg2021; 222(6): 1051–1059.
9.
MichaelsonGKarasikDPolenE, et al. Preparing for AI in resident selection: a scoping review of current applications and limitationsLaryngoscope2025; 135(11): 4053–4063.
10.
SumnerMDHowellTCSotoAL, et al. The use of artificial intelligence in residency application evaluation-a scoping review. J Grad Med Educ2025; 17(3): 308–319.
11.
JiangTErSHeronMJ, et al. Artificial intelligence use in academic applicant screening: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open2025; 13(10): e7177.
12.
VarmanPMNicholasSConnerA, et al. Feasibility of using AI to evaluate general surgery residency application personal statements. J Surg Educ2025; 82(12): 103655.
13.
MatsubaraS.Applicant essays and recommendation letters in residency selection: how generative artificial intelligence is changing them. J Investig Med2025; 73(5): 435–437.
14.
LumZCGuntupalliLSaizAM, et al. Can artificial intelligence fool residency selection committees? Analysis of personal statements by real applicants and generative AI, a randomized, single-blind multicenter study. JB JS Open Access2024; 9(4): e24.00028.
15.
SimisterSKHuishEGTsaiEY, et al. Can artificial intelligence deceive residency committees? A randomized multicenter analysis of letters of recommendation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2025; 33(6): e348–e55.
16.
MatsubaraSMatsubaraD.What’s the difference between human-written manuscripts versus ChatGPT-generated manuscripts involving “human touch”?J Obstet Gynaecol Res2025; 51(2): e16226.
17.
CuMAHochmanS.Scores of stanford students used ChatGPT on final exams, survey says. The Stanford Daily, 2022.
18.
MangoldSReamM.Artificial intelligence in graduate medical education applications. J Grad Med Educ2024; 16(2): 115–118.
19.
KeirGHuWFilippiCG, et al. Using artificial intelligence in medical school admissions screening to decrease inter- and intra-observer variability. JAMIA Open2023; 6(1): ooad011.
20.
MatsubaraS.Large language model content detectors: effects of human editing and ChatGPT mimicking individual style-A preliminary study. J Investig Med2025; 73(8): 666–672.
