SmithBRamadossTD’AmarioV, et al. EXPRESS: utilization and perception of generative artificial intelligence by medical students in residency applications. J Investig Med2025: 10815589251322102.
2.
RuizAMKrausMBArendtKW, et al. Artificial intelligence-created personal statements compared with applicant-written personal statements: a survey of obstetric anesthesia fellowship program directors in the United States. Int J Obstet Anesth2024; 61: 104293.
3.
CrawfordLMHendzlikPLamJ, et al. Digital ink and surgical dreams: perceptions of artificial intelligence-generated essays in residency applications. J Surg Res2024; 301: 504–511.
4.
SimisterSKHuishEGTsaiEY, et al. Can artificial intelligence deceive residency committees? A randomized multicenter analysis of letters of recommendation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2025; 33(6): e348–e355.
5.
MatsubaraSMatsubaraD.What’s the difference between human-written manuscripts versus ChatGPT-generated manuscripts involving “human touch”?J Obstet Gynaecol Res2025; 51(2): e16226.
6.
MatsubaraS.Comparing letters written by humans and ChatGPT: a preliminary study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2025; 168(1): 320–325.
7.
LiangWYuksekgonulMMaoY, et al. GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers. Patterns (NY)2023; 4(7): 100779.
8.
MatsubaraS.ChatGPT use in paper writing: a virtue for “English non-natives”?J Obstet Gynaecol Res2024; 50(9): 1753.
9.
MondalH.Do I write like artificial intelligence?Ann Surg Oncol2024; 32(4): 2423–2424.
10.
MatsubaraS.Rethinking personal statements submitted for obstetric anesthesia fellowship: beyond human-written or artificial intelligence-generated. Int J Obstet Anesth. Epub ahead of print 5 December 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104309
11.
MatsubaraS.Comment on “Artificial intelligence-generated writing in the ERAS personal statement: an emerging quandary for post-graduate medical education”. Acad Psychiatry. Epub ahead of print 18 February 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s40596-025-02123-9
