Cardiac disease in pregnancy is an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. In many high-income countries, acquired cardiac disease is now the largest cause of maternal mortality. Given its prevalence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), rheumatic heart disease is the most common cause of cardiac disease in pregnancy worldwide and is associated with poor maternal outcome. The diagnosis of cardiac disease in pregnancy is often delayed resulting in excess maternal morbidity and mortality. Maternal mortality review committees have suggested that prompt recognition and treatment of heart disease in pregnancy may improve maternal outcome. Given the similarities between symptoms of normal pregnancy and those of cardiac disease, the clinical diagnosis of heart disease in pregnancy is challenging with echocardiography being the primary diagnostic modality. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) at the point of care provides supplemental data to the history and physical examination and has been demonstrated to permit early diagnosis and improvement in the management of cardiac disease in emergency medicine, intensive care, and anesthesia. It has also been demonstrated to be useful in surveillance for rheumatic heart disease in LMICs. The use of FOCUS may allow earlier and more accurate diagnosis of cardiac disease in pregnancy with the potential to decrease morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries.
NeskovicANEdvardsenTGalderisiM, et al. Focus cardiac ultrasound: the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging viewpoint. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging2014; 15(9): 956–960.
2.
MarbachJAAlmuflehADi SantoP, et al. Comparative accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasonography and clinical examination for left ventricular dysfunction and valvular heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med2019; 171(4): 264–272.
3.
SpencerKTFlachskampfFA.Focused cardiac ultrasonography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging2019; 12(7 Part 1): 1243–1253.
4.
Roos-HesselinkJWRuysTPSteinJI, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in patients with structural or ischaemic heart disease: results of a registry of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J2013; 34(9): 657–65.
5.
World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2019.
6.
HeemelaarSPetrusAKnightM, et al. Maternal mortality due to cardiac disease in low- and middle-income countries. Trop Med Int Health2020; 25(6): 673–686.
7.
NairMNelson-PiercyCKnightM.Indirect maternal deaths: UK and global perspectives. Obstetr Med2017; 10(1): 10–15.
8.
SandersonJEMayosiBYusufS, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular disease. Heart (British Cardiac Society)2007; 93(10): 1175.
9.
MoussaHNRajapreyarI.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 212: pregnancy and heart disease. Obstetr Gynecol2019; 134(4): 881–882.
10.
van HagenIMBoersmaEJohnsonMR, et al. Global cardiac risk assessment in the Registry of Pregnancy and Cardiac disease: results of a registry from the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Failure2016; 18(5): 523–533.
11.
GrotegutCAKuklinaEVAnstromKJ, et al. Factors associated with the change in prevalence of cardiomyopathy at delivery in the period 2000–2009: a population-based prevalence study. BJOG2014; 121(11): 1386–1394.
12.
HameedABLawtonESMcCainCL, et al. Pregnancy-related cardiovascular deaths in California: beyond peripartum cardiomyopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol2015; 213(3): 379 e1–10.
13.
BrillerJKochARGellerSEIllinois Department of Public Health Maternal Mortality Review Committee Working G. Maternal cardiovascular mortality in Illinois, 2002–2011. Obstet Gynecol2017; 129(5): 819–826.
14.
VangenSBødkerBEllingsenL, et al. Maternal deaths in the Nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96(9): 1112–1119.
15.
WatkinsDASebitloaneMEngelME, et al. The burden of antenatal heart disease in South Africa: a systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord2012; 12(1): 1–9.
16.
HuJYeYLuA, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with heart disease in China. Am J Cardiol2020; 125(11): 1718–1724.
17.
KhannaRChandraDYadavS, et al. Maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant females with rheumatic heart disease. Indian Heart J2021; 73(2): 185–189.
18.
BaghelJKeepanasserilAPillaiAA, et al. Prediction of adverse cardiac events in pregnant women with valvular rheumatic heart disease. Heart2020; 106(18): 1400–1406.
19.
HoganMCForemanKJNaghaviM, et al. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet2010; 375(9726): 1609–1623.
KnightMKenyonSBrocklehurstP, et al. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care: lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland confidential enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–2012. 2017. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2014.
22.
PfallerBSathananthanGGrewalJ, et al. Preventing complications in pregnant women with cardiac disease. J Am College of Cardiol2020; 75(12): 1443–1452.
23.
MagunEDeFilippisEMNobleS, et al. Cardiovascular care for pregnant women with cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol2020; 76(18): 2102–2113.
24.
LumsdenRBarasaFParkLP, et al. High burden of cardiac disease in pregnancy at a National Referral Hospital in Western Kenya. Global Heart2020; 15(1): 10.
25.
KumariAKumarKKumar SinhaA.The pattern of valvular heart diseases in India During pregnancy and its outcomes. Cureus2021; 13(7): e16394.
26.
Endorsed by the European Society of Gynecology, the Association for European Paediatric Cardiology, the German Society for Gender Medicine; Regitz-ZagrosekVBlomstrom LundqvistCBorghiC, et al. ESC Guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J2011; 32(24): 3147–3197.
27.
DrenthenWBoersmaEBalciA, et al. Predictors of pregnancy complications in women with congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J2010; 31(17): 2124–2132.
28.
SiuSCSermerMColmanJM, et al. Prospective multicenter study of pregnancy outcomes in women with heart disease. Circulation2001; 104(5): 515–521.
29.
PriyaS-PSeabeJSliwaK.The importance of cardiovascular pathology contributing to maternal death: confidential enquiry into maternal deaths in South Africa, 2011–2013. Cardiovasc J Africa2016; 27(2): 60–65.
30.
MainEKMcCainCLMortonCH, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality in California: causes, characteristics, and improvement opportunities. Obstet Gynecol2015; 125(4): 938–947.
31.
GolandSModiKBitarF, et al. Clinical profile and predictors of complications in peripartum cardiomyopathy. J Cardiac Failure2009; 15(8): 645–650.
32.
CampanharoFFCecattiJGHaddadSM, et al. The impact of cardiac diseases during pregnancy on severe maternal morbidity and mortality in Brazil. PLoS One2015; 10(12): e0144385.
33.
HameedAMortonCMooreA.Improving health care response to cardiovascular disease in pregnancy and postpartum. Calif Maternal Qual Care Collab2017; 11.
34.
PetersenEEDavisNLGoodmanD, et al. Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2019; 68(18): 423–429.
35.
MehtaMJacobsonTPetersD, et al. Handheld ultrasound versus physical examination in patients referred for transthoracic echocardiography for a suspected cardiac condition. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging2014; 7(10): 983–990.
36.
KazahuraPTMushiTLPallangyoP, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for Subclinical Rheumatic Heart Disease among primary school children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord2021; 21(1): 610.
37.
NegiPCSondhiSAsotraS, et al. Current status of rheumatic heart disease in India. Indian Heart J2019; 71(1): 85–90.
38.
NascimentoBRSableCNunesMCP, et al. Comparison between different strategies of rheumatic heart disease echocardiographic screening in Brazil: data from the PROVAR (Rheumatic Valve Disease Screening Program) study. J Am Heart Assoc2018; 7(4): e008039.
39.
FrenchKAPoppasA.Rheumatic heart disease in pregnancy: global challenges and clear opportunities. Circulation2018; 137(8): 817–819.
40.
EngelmanDKadoJHReményiB, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound screening for rheumatic heart disease by briefly trained health workers: a study of diagnostic accuracy. Lancet Global Health2016; 4(6): e386–e394.
41.
OttoHSætherSGBanteyrgaL, et al. High prevalence of subclinical rheumatic heart disease in pregnant women in a developing country: an echocardiographic study. Echocardiography2011; 28(10): 1049–1053.
42.
NascimentoBRSableCNunesMCP, et al. Echocardiographic screening of pregnant women by non-physicians with remote interpretation in primary care. Family Pract2021; 38(3): 225–230.
43.
LouisJMMogosMFSalemiJL, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and severe maternal–infant morbidity/mortality in the United States, 1998–2009. Sleep2014; 37(5): 843–849.
44.
NormanJEReynoldsR.The consequences of obesity and excess weight gain in pregnancy. Proc Nutr Soc2011; 70(4): 450–456.
45.
BowyerL.The confidential enquiry into maternal and Child health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer 2003–2005. The seventh report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the UK. London: SAGE Publications, 2008.
46.
CreangaAACallaghanWM.Recent increases in the U.S. Maternal mortality rate: disentangling trends from measurement issues. Obstet Gynecol2017; 129(1): 206–207.
47.
ChisholmCBDodgeWRBaliseRR, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound training: how much is enough?J Emerg Med2013; 44(4): 818–822.
48.
MokKL.Make it SIMPLE: enhanced shock management by focused cardiac ultrasound. J Intensive Care2016; 4(1): 51.
49.
TawfikMTamanMTarbayA, et al. Circulatory collapse in a parturient undergoing cesarean delivery: a diagnostic dilemma. Int J Obstetr Anesth2017; 31: 91–96.
50.
LabovitzAJNobleVEBierigM, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2010; 23(12): 1225–1230.
51.
EngelmanDKadoJHReményiB, et al. Teaching focused echocardiography for rheumatic heart disease screening. Ann Pediatr Cardiol2015; 8(2): 118.
52.
GibsonLEWhite-DzuroGALindsayPJ, et al. Ensuring competency in focused cardiac ultrasound: a systematic review of training programs. J Intensive Care2020; 8(1):1–16.
53.
GasparHAMorhySSLianzaAC, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound: a training course for pediatric intensivists and emergency physicians. BMC Med Educ2014; 14(1): 1–10.
54.
SpencerKTKimuraBJKorcarzCE, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2013; 26(6): 567–581.
55.
NeskovicANSkinnerHPriceS, et al. Focus cardiac ultrasound core curriculum and core syllabus of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging2018; 19(5): 475–481.
56.
ConlinFConnellyNRRaghunathanK, et al. Focused transthoracic cardiac ultrasound: a survey of training practices. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesthesia2016; 30(1): 102–106.
57.
MosierJMMaloJStolzLA, et al. Critical care ultrasound training: a survey of US fellowship directors. J Crit Care2014; 29(4): 645–649.
58.
FarsiDHajsadeghiSHajighanbariMJ, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) by emergency medicine residents in patients with suspected cardiovascular diseases. J Ultrasound2017; 20(2): 133–138.
59.
KanyangararaMChouVBCreangaAA, et al. Linking household and health facility surveys to assess obstetric service availability, readiness and coverage: evidence from 17 low- and middle-income countries. J Glob Health2018; 8(1): 010603.
60.
Waweru-SiikaWBarasaAWachiraB, et al. Building focused cardiac ultrasound capacity in a lower middle-income country: a single centre study to assess training impact. Afr J Emerg Med2020; 10(3): 136–143.
61.
EberlyLARusingizaEParkPH, et al. Nurse-driven echocardiography and management of heart failure at district hospitals in rural Rwanda. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes2018; 11(12): e004881.
62.
MitchellCRahkoPSBlauwetLACanadayBFinstuenJAFosterMC, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic examination in adults: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2019; 32(1): 1–64.
63.
BeatonALuJCAlikuT, et al. The utility of handheld echocardiography for early rheumatic heart disease diagnosis: a field study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging2015; 16(5): 475–482.
64.
MarkDGKuBSCarrBG, et al. Directed bedside transthoracic echocardiography: preferred cardiac window for left ventricular ejection fraction estimation in critically ill patients. Am J Emerg Med2007; 25(8): 894–900.
65.
LangRMBadanoLPMor-AviV, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2015; 28(1): 1–39 e14.
66.
CroftLBDuvallWLGoldmanME.A pilot study of the clinical impact of hand-carried cardiac ultrasound in the medical clinic. Echocardiography2006; 23(6): 439–446.
67.
SiadeckiSDFrasureSELewissRE, et al. High body mass index is strongly correlated with decreased image quality in focused bedside echocardiography. J Emerg Med2016; 50(2): 295–301.
68.
JainDGrejsAMBhavsarR, et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound is feasible in parturients: a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2017; 61(9): 1105–1113.
69.
AmbrozicJLucovnikMProkseljK, et al. Dynamic changes in cardiac function before and early postdelivery in women with severe preeclampsia. J Hypertens2020; 38(7): 1367–1374.
70.
DennisATCastroJMOngM, et al. Haemodynamics in obese pregnant women. Int J Obstet Anesth2012; 21(2): 129–134.
71.
UnluerEEKaragozAAkogluH, et al. Visual estimation of bedside echocardiographic ejection fraction by emergency physicians. West J Emerg Med2014; 15(2): 221–226.
72.
BustamANoor AzharMSinghVeriah R, et al. Performance of emergency physicians in point-of-care echocardiography following limited training. Emerg Med J2014; 31(5): 369–373.
73.
ShahgaldiKGudmundssonPManourasA, et al. Visually estimated ejection fraction by two dimensional and triplane echocardiography is closely correlated with quantitative ejection fraction by real-time three dimensional echocardiography. Cardiovasc Ultrasound2009; 7: 41.
74.
GoerkeRJCarlssonE.Calculation of right and left cardiac ventricular volumes. Method using standard computer equipment and biplane angiocardiograms. Invest Radiol1967; 2(5): 360–367.
75.
BetcherJMajkrzakACranfordJ, et al. Feasibility study of advanced focused cardiac measurements within the emergency department. Crit Ultrasound J2018; 10(1): 10.
76.
YinOWoodsAKoosB, et al. Central hemodynamics are associated with fetal outcomes in pregnancies of advanced maternal age. Pregnancy Hypertens2020; 19: 67–73.
77.
YanBPFokJC-YWongTH-Y, et al. Junior medical student performed focused cardiac ultrasound after brief training to detect significant valvular heart disease. IJC Heart Vasc2018; 19: 41–45.
78.
BenacerrafBRMintonKKBensonCB, et al. Proceedings: beyond ultrasound first forum on improving the quality of ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstetr Gynecol2018; 218(1): 19–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
