Among non-destructive testing techniques, ultrasonic guided waves have been shown to be a very effective diagnostic tool. This diagnostic strategy aims to use Lamb mode information contained in dispersion curves to infer the elastic and structural characteristics of structures such as plates and rods. In the present work, a first numerical study is performed in order to estimate the distribution of the density through the thickness of semi-infinite plates on the basis of the available dispersion data. The resulting inverse problem is solved by assuming the knowledge of some points belonging to the first Lamb modes and imposing the minimization of the distance between actual and predicted frequencies. The reconstruction of such detailed information certainly constitutes an important challenge, but it can be usefully exploited in several applications such as the early detection of corrosion in steel structures and in the spatial distribution of tissue-level properties inside cortical bones – information useful for the diagnosis of osteoporosis disease. The proposed computational approach is based on a semi-analytical finite element formulation of the reference model and a multigrid-like optimization of the distance between the actual and the predicted eigenfrequencies. Its validation was pursued by an extensive numerical experimentation aiming to point out the influence of the kind and the amount of the used known data, to assess the reliability of the inversion algorithm and the effects due to the presence of noise in the measured data.
IdaNMeyendorfN. Handbook of advanced nondestructive evaluation. Cham: Springer, 2019.
2.
CawleyP. Guided waves in long range nondestructive testing and structural health monitoring: principles, history of applications and prospects. NDT E Int2024; 142: 103026.
3.
LoweMJSAlleyneDNCawleyP. Defect detection in pipes using guided waves. Ultrasonics1998; 36(1): 147–154.
4.
SuZYeLLuY. Guided lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: a review. J Sound Vib2006; 295(3): 753–780.
5.
LaugierPHaiatG. Bone quantitative ultrasound. Cham: Springer, 2011.
6.
NicholsonPHFMoilanenPKärkkäinenT, et al. Guided ultrasonic waves in long bones: modelling, experiment and in vivo application. Physiol Meas2002; 23(4): 755.
7.
MoilanenP. Ultrasonic guided waves in bone. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2008; 55(6): 1277–1286.
8.
TranTNHTLeLHTaD. Ultrasonic guided waves in bone: a decade of advancement in review. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2022; 69(10).
9.
TurcoE. Tools for the numerical solution of inverse problems in structural mechanics: review and research perspectives. Eur J Environ Civ Eng2017; 21(5): 509–554.
10.
KarimMRMalAKBar-CohenY. Inversion of leaky lamb wave data by simplex algorithm. J Acoust Soc Am1990; 88(1): 482–491.
11.
SunHZhuJ. Nondestructive evaluation of steel-concrete composite structure using high-frequency ultrasonic guided wave. Ultrasonics2020; 103: 106096.
12.
ChimentiDE. Guided waves in plates and their use in materials characterization. Appl Mech Rev1997; 50(5): 247–284.
13.
LowetGVan der PerreG. Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. J Biomech1996; 29(10): 1255–1262.
14.
Van der PerreGLowetG. In vivo assessment of bone mechanical properties by vibration and ultrasonic wave propagation analysis. Bone1996; 18(1): S29–S35.
15.
RhoJY. An ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of human tibial cortical and cancellous bone. Ultrasonics1996; 34(8): 777–783.
16.
FoiretJMinonzioJGChappardC, et al. Combined estimation of thickness and velocities using ultrasound guided waves: a pioneering study on in vitro cortical bone samples. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control2014; 61(9): 1478–1488.
17.
BaiLXuKLiD, et al. Fatigue evaluation of long cortical bone using ultrasonic guided waves. J Biomech2018; 77: 83–90.
18.
TranTNHTSacchiMDTaD, et al. Nonlinear inversion of ultrasonic dispersion curves for cortical bone thickness and elastic velocities. Ann Biomed Eng2019; 47(11): 2178–2187.
19.
ChabotyANguyenVHHaiatG, et al. Cortical bone plate properties assessment using inversion of axially transmitted low frequency ultrasonic guided waves. J Acoust Soc Am2024; 156(2): 954–967.
20.
ChabotyANguyenVHHaiatG, et al. Estimating the properties of bone phantom cylinders through the inversion of axially transmitted low-frequency ultrasonic guided waves. Ultrasonics2025; 155: 107694.
21.
ZimaB. Guided ultrasonic wave technique for corrosion monitoring and thickness variability analysis. Measurement2025; 245: 116584.
22.
BilottaATurcoE. Numerical sensitivity analysis of corrosion detection. Math Mech Solids2017; 22(1): 72–88.
23.
RohrbachDLakshmananSPeyrinF, et al. Spatial distribution of tissue level properties in a human femoral cortical bone. J Biomech2012; 45(13): 1277–1286.
24.
NazemiSMKalajahiSMHCooperMLD, et al. Accounting for spatial variation of trabecular anisotropy with subject-specific finite element modeling moderately improves predictions of local subchondral bone stiffness at the proximal tibia. J Biomech2017; 59: 101–108.
25.
SansaloneVNailiSBoussonV, et al. Determination of the heterogeneous anisotropic elastic properties of human femoral bone: from nanoscopic to organ scale. J Biomech2010; 43(10): 1857–1863.
26.
PereiraDHaiatGFernandesJ, et al. Simulation of acoustic guided wave propagation in cortical bone using a semi-analytical finite element method. J Acoust Soc Am2017; 141(4): 2538–2547.
27.
AllenaRScerratoDBersaniAM, et al. A bi-dimensional model bridging microdamage evolution and bone remodeling: a computational study on a human femur. Math Mech Complex Syst2025; 13(3): 347–376.
28.
GiorgioIDell’IsolaFAndreausU, et al. An orthotropic continuum model with substructure evolution for describing bone remodeling: an interpretation of the primary mechanism behind Wolff’s law. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2023; 22: 2135–2152.
29.
GiorgioIAndreausUScerratoD, et al. Modeling of a non-local stimulus for bone remodeling process under cyclic load: application to a dental implant using a bioresorbable porous material. Math Mech Solids2017; 22(9): 1790–1805.
30.
GraffKF. Wave motion in elastic solids. New York: Dover Publications, 1975.
31.
RoseJL. Ultrasonic guided waves in solid media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
32.
GavrićL. Computation of propagative waves in free rail using a finite element technique. J Sound Vib1995; 185(3): 531–543.
33.
HayashiTSongWJRoseJL. Guided wave dispersion curves for a bar with an arbitrary cross-section, a rod and rail example. Ultrasonics2003; 41(3): 175–183.
34.
AlleyneDCawleyP. A two-dimensional Fourier transform method for the measurement of propagating multimode signals. J Acoust Soc Am1991; 89(3): 1159–1168.
35.
XuKTaDCassereauD, et al. Multichannel processing for dispersion curves extraction of ultrasonic axial-transmission signals: comparisons and case studies. J Acoust Soc Am2016; 140(3): 1758–1770.
36.
AmbarzumianV. Über eine Frager der Eigenwerttheorie. Z Phys1929; 53: 690–695.
37.
BorgG. Eine Umkehrung der Sturm-Liouvilleschen Eigenwertaufgabe. Bestimmung der Differentialgleichung durch die Eigenwerte. Acta Math1946; 78: 1–96.
38.
MarchenkoVA. Some problems in the theory of second-order differential operators. Dokl Akad Nauk1950; 72(3): 457–460.
39.
Gel’fandIMLevitanBM. On the determination of a differential equation from its spectral function. Am Math Soc Transl1955; 1: 253–304.
40.
BarcilonV. Iterative solution of the inverse Sturm–Liouville problem. J Math Phys1974; 15: 429–436.
41.
TurcoEBilottaA. Inverse scattering transform: an overview and the toda’s chain as paradigm for discrete systems. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2025; 37(69): 1–27.
BilottaAMorassiATurcoE. Reconstructing blockages in a symmetric duct via quasi-isospectral horn operators. J Sound Vib2016; 366: 149–172.
46.
BilottaAMorassiATurcoE. Damage identification for steel-concrete composite beams through convolutional neural networks. J Vib Control2023; 30: 876–889.
47.
KawanoAMorassiAZaeraR. Reconstruction of a general mass density in a rectangular membrane from finite eigenvalue data. Mech Syst Signal Process2023; 187: 109901.
48.
GalánJMAbascalR. Numerical simulation of lamb wave scattering in semi-infinite plates. Int J Numer Methods Eng2002; 53(5): 1145–1173.
49.
FriedlandSNocedalJOvertonML. The formulation and analysis of numerical methods for inverse eigenvalue problems. SIAM J Numer Anal1987; 24(3): 634–667.
The MathWorks Inc,.Matlab version 25.2.0.2998904 (r2025b), 2025.
52.
StewartGWSunJG. Matrix perturbation theory (computer science and scientific computing). New York: Academic Press, 1990.
53.
BurnhamKPAndersonDR. Model selection and multimodel inference. Cham: Springer, 2002.
54.
ScholzRHoffmannFvon SachsenS, et al. Validation of density–elasticity relationships for finite element modeling of human pelvic bone by modal analysis. J Biomech2013; 46(15): 2667–2673.
55.
La ValleGSoizeCMisraA, et al. A nonlinear micropolar continuum model with diffusion–reaction equation for remodeling of bone with trabecular lattice microarchitecture. Math Mech Solids. Epub ahead of print January 16, 2026. DOI: 10.1177/10812865251413553.
56.
AddessiDD’AnnibaleFPlacidiL, et al. A bone remodeling approach encoding the effect of damage and a diffusive bio-mechanical stimulus. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2024; 36(4): 993–1012.
57.
AltenbachHEremeyevVA. On the linear theory of micropolar plates. Z Angew Math Mech2009; 89(4): 242–256.
58.
dell’IsolaFSteigmannDDella CorteA, et al. Discrete and continuum models for complex metamaterials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
59.
KacM. Can one hear the shape of a drum?Am Math Mon1966; 73(4): 1–23.
60.
ThomsonWT. Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid medium. J Appl Phys1950; 21(2): 89–93.
61.
GuoKJoshiSWaltonJR. Recovery of material parameters of soft hyperelastic tissue by an inverse spectral technique. Int J Eng Sci2012; 56: 1–16.
