In this article, we apply sensitivity analysis (SA) to study the pressure–inflation relation and axial force in a pressurized and extended cylindrical tube. The material consists of an isotropic ground substance that is reinforced in the azimuthal direction with one family of fibers which are taken to be dispersed about that (mean) direction. The natural configuration of the fibers may differ from that of the ground substance, either because the fibers are pre-stretched or because the bonding between the fibers and the ground substance is considered to be imperfect. The axial stretch of the cylindrical membrane is given by a constant value. The input parameters data of the mechanical system, namely, the azimuthal stretch of the cylinder, the fiber dispersion, and the fiber natural configurations, are assumed to be distributed according to three probability distribution functions. In the sensitivity analysis, we apply the Sobol method as well as the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) method to determine the way in which variations of the input parameters affect the required inflation pressure and corresponding axial force (output variables). The implementation of the Sobol and FAST methods allows us to account for the interplay of different parameters as well as to identify the most influential parameters in both the pressure–inflation relation and the axial force. The analysis singles out all these aspects showing a rich variety of results.
MerodioJOgdenRW.Extension, inflation, and torsion of a residually stressed circular cylindrical tube. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2016; 28(1): 157–174.
2.
MerodioJHaughtonD.Bifurcation of thick-walled cylinder shells and the mechanical response of arterial tissue affected by Marfan’s syndrome. Mech Res Commun2010; 38: 1–6.
3.
RodriguezJMerodioJ.A new derivation of the bifurcation conditions of inflated cylindrical membranes of elastic material under axial loading. Application to aneurysm formation. Mech Res Commun2010; 38: 203–210.
4.
JhaNKMoradalizadehSReinosoJ, et al. On the helical buckling of anisotropic tubes with application to arteries. Mech Res Commun2023; 128: 104067.
5.
HamdaouiMEMerodioJ.Azimuthal shear of doubly fiber-reinforced, non-linearly elastic cylindrical tubes. J Eng Math2015; 95: 347–357.
6.
FuYBLiuJLFranciscoGS.Localized bulging in an inflated cylindrical tube of arbitrary thickness–the effect of bending stiffness. J Mech Phys Solids2016; 90: 45–60.
7.
FontAJhaNKDehghaniH, et al. Modelling of residually stressed, extended, and inflated cylinders with application to aneurysms. Mech Res Commun2021; 111: 103643.
8.
DehghaniHDesena-GalarzaDJhaNK, et al. Bifurcation and post-bifurcation of an inflated and extended residually-stressed circular cylindrical tube with application to aneurysms initiation and propagation in arterial wall tissue. Finite Elem Anal Des2019; 161: 51–60.
9.
AlhayaniAARodriguezJMerodioJ.Competition between radial expansion and axial propagation in bulging of inflated cylinders with application to aneurysms propagation in arterial wall tissue. Int J Eng Sci2014; 85: 74–89.
10.
AlhayaniAAGiraldoJARodriguezJ, et al. Computational modeling of bulging of inflated cylindrical shells applicable to aneurysm formation and propagation in arterial wall tissue. Finite Elem Anal Des2013; 73: 20–29.
11.
MoradalizadehSTopolHDemirkoparanH, et al. Remarks on bifurcation of an inflated and extended swellable isotropic tube. Math Mech Solids2023; 29: 474–493.
12.
DemirkoparanHPenceTJ.Swelling of an internally pressurized nonlinearly elastic tube with fiber reinforcing. Int J Solids Struct2007; 44: 4009–4029.
13.
DemirkoparanHPenceTJ.The effect of fiber recruitment on the swelling of a pressurized anisotropic nonlinearly elastic tube. Int J Non-Linear Mech2007; 42: 258–270.
14.
DemirkoparanHPenceTJ.Torsional swelling of a hyperelastic tube with helically wound reinforcement. J Elast2008; 92: 61–90.
15.
DemirkoparanHMerodioJ.Bulging bifurcation of inflated circular cylinders of doubly fiber-reinforced hyperelastic material under axial loading and swelling. Math Mech Solids2017; 22: 666–682.
16.
DemirkoparanHMerodioJ.Swelling and axial propagation of bulging with application to aneurysm propagation in arteries. Math Mech Solids2020; 25: 1459–1471.
17.
DemirkoparanHPenceTJ.Swelling-induced twisting and shearing in fiber composites: the effect of the base matrix mechanical response. Emergent Mater2013; 3: 87–101.
18.
YucesoyAPenceTJ.Radially oscillating incompressible hyperelastic multi-layer tubes: interface effects and energy approach. J Elast. Epub ahead of print 15March2023. DOI: 10.1007/s10659-023-10006-z.
19.
MelnikovAMerodioJBustamanteR, et al. Bifurcation analysis of residually stressed neo-Hookean and Ogden electroelastic tubes. Phil Trans R Soc A2022; 380: 20210331.
20.
MelnikovAOgdenRWDorfmannL, et al. Bifurcation analysis of elastic residually-stressed circular cylindrical tubes. Int J Solids Struct2021; 226–227: 111062.
21.
MelnikovAMerodioJ.Stability analysis of an inflated, axially extended, residually stressed circular cylindrical tube. J Appl Comput Mech2023; 9(3): 834–847.
22.
HolzapfelGASommerGGasserCT, et al. Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol2005; 289(5): H2048–H2058.
23.
NiestrawskaJAPukalukABabuAR, et al. Differences in collagen fiber diameter and waviness between healthy and aneurysmal abdominal aortas. Microsc Microanal2022; 28(5): 1649–1663.
24.
UshikiT.Collagen fibers, reticular fibers and elastic fibers. A comprehensive understanding from a morphological viewpoint. Arch Hist Cytol2002; 65(2): 109–126.
25.
TopolHDemirkoparanHPenceTJ.Morphoelastic fiber remodeling in pressurized thick-walled cylinders with application to soft tissue collagenous tubes. Eur J Mech Solids2019; 77: 103800.
26.
GouKTopolHDemirkoparanH, et al. Stress-swelling finite element modeling of cervical response with homeostatic collagen fiber distributions. J Biomech Eng2020; 142(8): 081002.
27.
TopolHNazariHStoffelM, et al. Instabilities of an inflated and extended doubly fiber-reinforced cylindrical membrane under damage processes and different natural configurations of its constituents with application to abnormal artery dilation. Thin-Walled Struct2024; 197: 111562.
28.
TopolHJhaNKDemirkoparanH, et al. Bulging of inflated membranes made of fiber reinforced materials with different natural configurations. Eur J Mech A Solids2022; 96: 104670.
29.
TopolHAsghariHStoffelM, et al. Post-bifurcation of inflated fibrous cylindrical membranes under different fiber configurations. Eur J Mech A Solids2023; 101: 105065
30.
MerodioJOgdenRW.Finite deformation elasticity theory. In: MerodioJOgdenR (eds) Constitutive modelling of solid continua. Solid mechanics and its applications. Cham: Springer, 2020, pp. 17–52.
31.
AlhayaniAARodriguezJMerodioJ.Numerical analysis of neck and bulge propagation in anisotropic tubes subject to axial loading and internal pressure. Finite Elem Anal Des2014; 90: 11–19.
32.
JhaNKMerodioJReinosoJ.A general non-local constitutive relation for residually stressed solids. Mech Res Commun2019; 101: 103421.
33.
ShariffMHBMMerodioJBustamanteR.Nonlinear elastic constitutive relations of residually stressed composites with stiff curved fibers. Appl Math Mech2022; 43(10): 1515–1530.
34.
ShariffMHBMMerodioJBustamanteR.Finite deformations of fibre-reinforced elastic solids with fibre bending stiffness: a spectral approach. J Appl Comput Mech2022; 8(4): 1332–1342.
35.
AsghariHTopolHMarkertB, et al. Application of sensitivity analysis in extension, inflation, and torsion of residually stressed circular cylindrical tubes. Probab Eng Mech2023; 44: 103469.
36.
Anstett-CollinFMaraTBassetM.Application of global sensitivity analysis to a tire model with correlated inputs. Simul Modell Pract Theory2014; 44: 54–62.
37.
BeckerWOakleyJESuraceC, et al. Bayesian sensitivity analysis of a nonlinear finite element model. Mech Syst Signal Process2012; 32: 18–31.
38.
NarasimhaR, KVKumarRKBoharaPC.A sensitivity analysis of design attributes and operating conditions on tyre operating temperatures and rolling resistance using finite element analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part D: J Automob Eng2006; 220(5): 501–517.
39.
SaisanaMSaltelliATarantolaS.Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. J R Stat Soc A2005; 168(2): 307–323.
40.
SchaferFSturdyJMesekM, et al. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis during the development and validation of numerical artery models. Scand Simul Soc2022; : 256–262.
41.
FreyHCPatilSR.Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Anal2002; 22(3): 553–578.
42.
AsghariHTopolHMarkertB, et al. Application of the extended Fourier amplitude sensitivity testing (FAST) method to inflated, axial stretched, and residually stressed cylinders. Appl Math Mech2023; 44: 2139–2162.
43.
AndrianovIDanishevs’kyyVTopolH, et al. Homogenization of a 1D nonlinear dynamical problem for periodic composites. J Appl Math Mech2011; 91(6): 523–534.
44.
AndrianovIVDanishevs’kyyVVTopolH, et al. Propagation of floquet–bloch shear waves in viscoelastic composites: analysis and comparison of interface/interphase models for imperfect bonding. Acta Mech2017; 228: 1177–1196.
45.
AndrianovIVDanishevskyyVVTopolH.Local stress distribution in composites for pulled-out fibers with axially varying bonding. Acta Mech2020; 231: 2065–2083.
46.
ChagnonGRebouahMFavierD.Hyperelastic energy densities for soft biological tissues: a review. J Elast2015; 120: 129–160.
47.
TopolHDemirkoparanHPenceTJ.Fibrillar collagen: a review of the mechanical modeling of strain-mediated enzymatic turnover. Appl Mech Rev2021; 73: 050802.
48.
CyronCJAydinRCHumphreyJD.A homogenized constrained mixture (and mechanical analog) model for growth and remodeling of soft tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2016; 15: 1389–1403.
49.
HadiMFSanderEARubertiJW, et al. Simulated remodeling of loaded collagen networks via strain-dependent enzymatic degradation and constant fiber growth. Mech Mater2012; 44: 72–82.
TopolHGouKDemirkoparanH, et al. Hyperelastic modeling of the combined effects of tissue swelling and deformation-related collagen renewal in fibrous soft tissue. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2018; 17: 1543–1567.
52.
TopolHDemirkoparanHPenceTJ.Modeling stretch-dependent collagen fiber density. Mech Res Commun2021; 116: 103740.
53.
GasserTCOgdenRWHolzapfelGA.Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface2006; 3: 15–35.
54.
GuoZWangSFuY.Localized bulging of an inflated rubber tube with fixed ends. Phil Trans R Soc A2022; 380(2234): 20210318.
55.
SaltelliARattoMAndresT, et al. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
56.
SaltelliATarantolaSChanKS.A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics1999; 41(1): 39–56.
57.
SaltelliATarantolaSCampolongoF.Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modeling. Stat Sci2000; 15: 377–395.
58.
EfronBSteinC.The jackknife estimate of variance. Annu Stat1981; 9: 586–596.
59.
SaltelliA.Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Comput Phys Commun2002; 145(2): 280–297.
60.
ArcherGEBSaltelliASobolIM.Sensitivity measures, ANOVA-like techniques, and the use of bootstrap. J Stat Comput Simul1997; 58(2): 99–120.
61.
SobolIM.Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models. Math Comput Modell Exp1993; 1: 407–414.
62.
JanonAKleinTLagnouxA, et al. Asymptotic normality and efficiency of two Sobol index estimators. Esaim Probab Stat2014; 18: 342–364.
63.
IoossBVanDFDevictorN.Response surfaces and sensitivity analyses for an environmental model of dose calculations. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2006; 91(10–11): 1241–1251.
64.
SaltelliAAnnoniPAzziniI, et al. Variance-based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Comput Phys Commun2010; 181(2): 259–270.
65.
JansonMJW.Analysis of variance designs for model output. Comput Phys Commun1999; 117(1–2): 35–43.
66.
PuyAPianoSLSaltelliA, et al. Sensobol: an “R” package to compute variance-based sensitivity indices. J Stat Softw2021; 102: 1–37.
67.
LiuROwenAB.Estimating mean dimensionality of analysis of variance decompositions. J Am Stat Assoc2006; 101(474): 712–721.
68.
CukierRIFortuinCMShulerKE, et al. Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I theory. J Chem Phys1973; 59: 3873–3878.
69.
MaraTA.Extension of the RBD-FAST method to the computation of global sensitivity indices. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2009; 94(8): 1274–1281.
70.
XuCGertnerG.Understanding and comparisons of different sampling approaches for the Fourier Amplitudes Sensitivity Test (FAST). Comput Stat Data Anal2011; 55(1): 184–198.
71.
SaltelliABoladoR.An alternative way to compute Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST). Comput Stat Data Anal1998; 26(4): 445–460.
72.
BeckerW.Metafunctions for benchmarking in sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf2020; 204: 107189.
73.
LiuXWangH.A discretization algorithm based on a heterogeneity criterion. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng2005; 17(9): 1166–1173.
74.
JohnsonNLKotzSIBalakrishnanN (eds). Beta distributions. In: Continuous univariate distributions. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1994, pp. 221–235.
75.
TopolHAl-ChlaihawiMJDemirkoparanH, et al. Bulging initiation and propagation in fiber-reinforced swellable Mooney–Rivlin membranes. J Eng Math2021; 128: 1–15.
76.
TopolHAl-ChlaihawiMJDemirkoparanH, et al. Bifurcation of fiber-reinforced cylindrical membranes under extension, inflation, and swelling. J Appl Comput Mech2023; 9: 113–128.
77.
SeddighiYHanHC.Buckling of arteries with noncircular cross sections: theory and finite element simulations. Front Physiol2021; 12: 712636.
78.
TopolHFontAMelnikovA, et al. On the inflation, bulging/necking bifurcation and post-bifurcation of a cylindrical membrane under limited extensibility of its constituents. Math Mech Solids. Epub ahead of print 3January2024. DOI: 10.1177/10812865231214262.
79.
AmbrosiDBen AmarMCyronCJ, et al. Growth and remodeling of living tissues: perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. J R Soc Interface2019; 16: 20190233.
80.
SainiKChoSDoolingLJ, et al. Tension in fibrils suppresses their enzymatic degradation—a molecular mechanism for “use it or lose it”. Matrix Biol2020; 85–86: 34–46.
