As the first endeavor in the context of Mindlin’s strain gradient theory, this study contributes a systematic and rigorous derivation for governing equations and boundary conditions of planar arbitrarily curved microbeams. The Timoshenko–Ehrenfest beam model is incorporated into a simplified version of Mindlin’s strain gradient theory. Kinematic unknowns include displacement components of the beam axis in the local coordinate system and the rotation of cross-section. Since the derived governing equations and boundary conditions are extremely complex, analytical solutions are not achievable for microbeams having non-uniform curvature. To facilitate the numerical analysis, two isogeometric collocation formulations are proposed, that is, displacement-based and mixed formulations. Several tests are designed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the proposed isogeometric collocation formulations, especially with respect to the well-known locking pathology. It is found that the mixed formulation is more accurate and robust than the displacement-based one. Therefore, the mixed formulation is then used to numerically investigate the size-dependent behavior and stiffening effect. Furthermore, some informative tests are performed to delineate the significance of the curviness in the prediction of structural responses of planar arbitrarily curved microbeams, which appears to be still an unanswered issue.
BogueR. MEMS sensors: past, present and future. Sens Rev2007; 27(1): 7–13.
2.
BogueR. Recent developments in MEMS sensors: a review of applications, markets and technologies. Sens Rev2013; 33(4): 300–304.
3.
BogueR. Towards the trillion sensors market. Sens Rev2014; 34(2): 137–142.
4.
YurishS. Sensors and biosensors, MEMS technologies and its applications. Barcelona: IFSA Publishing, 2014.
5.
O’DonnellJKimMYoonH-S. A review on electromechanical devices fabricated by additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng2016; 139(1): 010801.
6.
LakesRS. Experimental microelasticity of two porous solids. Int J Solid Struct1986; 22(1): 55–63.
7.
StelmashenkoNAWallsMGBrownLM, et al. Microindentations on W and Mo oriented single crystals: an STM study. Acta Metallurg Material1993; 41(10): 2855–2865.
8.
FleckNAMullerGMAshbyMF, et al. Strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment. Acta Metallurg Material1994; 42(2): 475–487.
9.
MaQClarkeDR. Size dependent hardness of silver single crystals. J Mater Res1995; 10(4): 853–863.
Dadgar-RadF. Analysis of strain gradient reissner–mindlin plates using a C0 four-node quadrilateral element. Int J Mech Sci2017; 122: 79–94.
23.
KordolemisAWeaverPM. Geometric–material analogy for multiscale modelling of twisted plates. Int J Solid Struct2017; 110-111: 24–35.
24.
MohammadiMIranmaneshANaseralaviSS, et al. Exact solution for bending analysis of functionally graded micro-plates based on strain gradient theory. Sci Eng Compos Mater2018; 25(3): 439–451.
25.
YueYMXuKYTanZQ, et al. The influence of surface stress and surface-induced internal residual stresses on the size-dependent behaviors of Kirchhoff microplate. Archiv Appl Mech2019; 89(7): 1301–1315.
26.
IshaquddinMGopalakrishnanS. Weak form quadrature elements for non-classical Kirchhoff plate theory. Ann Solid Struct Mech2020; 12(1): 123–139.
27.
ZhangBLiHLiuJ, et al. Surface energy-enriched gradient elastic Kirchhoff plate model and a novel weak-form solution scheme. Eur J Mech Solid2021; 85: 104118.
28.
NiiranenJKiendlJNiemiAH, et al. Isogeometric analysis for sixth-order boundary value problems of gradient-elastic Kirchhoff plates. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2017; 316: 328–348.
29.
Papargyri-BeskouSBeskosDE. Stability analysis of gradient elastic circular cylindrical thin shells. Int J Eng Sci2009; 47(11): 1379–1385.
30.
GaoXLParkSKMaHM. Analytical solution for a pressurized thick-walled spherical shell based on a simplified strain gradient elasticity theory. Math Mech Solid2009; 14(8): 747–758.
31.
Papargyri-BeskouSTsinopoulosSVBeskosDE. Wave propagation in and free vibrations of gradient elastic circular cylindrical shells. Acta Mechanica2012; 223(8): 1789–1807.
32.
GhavanlooEFazelzadehSA. Free vibration analysis of orthotropic doubly-curved shallow shells based on the gradient elasticity. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 45(1): 1448–1457.
33.
BalobanovVKiendlJKhakaloS, et al. Kirchhoff–Love shells within strain gradient elasticity: weak and strong formulations and an h3-conforming isogeometric implementation. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2019; 344: 837–857.
34.
AlamMMishraSK. A boundary layer solution for the post-critical thermo-electro-mechanical stability of nonlocal-strain gradient functionally graded piezoelectric cylindrical shells. Eur J Mech Solid2023; 97: 104836.
35.
HouDWangLYanJ. Vibration analysis of a cylindrical shell by using strain gradient theory via a moving kriging interpolation-based meshfree method. Thin Wall Struct2023; 184: 110466.
36.
GaoXLMaHM. Green’s function and Eshelby’s tensor based on a simplified strain gradient elasticity theory. Acta Mechanica2009; 207(3): 163–181.
37.
GaoXLMaHM. Strain gradient solution for Eshelby’s ellipsoidal inclusion problem. P R Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci2010; 466: 2425–2446.
38.
GaoXLMaHM. Solution of Eshelby’s inclusion problem with a bounded domain and Eshelby’s tensor for a spherical inclusion in a finite spherical matrix based on a simplified strain gradient elasticity theory. J Mech Phys Solid2010; 58(5): 779–797.
39.
GeorgiadisHGVardoulakisIVelgakiEG. Dispersive Rayleigh-wave propagation in microstructured solids characterized by dipolar gradient elasticity. J Elastic2004; 74(1): 17–45.
40.
GourgiotisPAGeorgiadisHG. Plane-strain crack problems in microstructured solids governed by dipolar gradient elasticity. J Mech Phys Solid2009; 57(11): 1898–1920.
41.
PapanicolopulosSAZervosA. Numerical solution of crack problems in gradient elasticity. Proc Inst Civil Eng—Eng Comput Mech2010; 163(2): 73–82.
42.
GourgiotisPASifnaiouMDGeorgiadisHG. The problem of sharp notch in microstructured solids governed by dipolar gradient elasticity. Int J Fract2010; 166(1): 179–201.
43.
PolizzottoC. A gradient elasticity theory for second-grade materials and higher order inertia. Int J Solid Struct2012; 49(15): 2121–2137.
44.
IsakssonPHägglundR. Crack-tip fields in gradient enhanced elasticity. Eng Fract Mech2013; 97: 186–192.
45.
GourgiotisPAGeorgiadisHGNeocleousI. On the reflection of waves in half-spaces of microstructured materials governed by dipolar gradient elasticity. Wave Motion2013; 50(3): 437–455.
46.
IsakssonPDumontPJJ. Approximation of mode I crack-tip displacement fields by a gradient enhanced elasticity theory. Eng Fract Mech2014; 117: 1–11.
47.
GeorgiadisHGGourgiotisPAAnagnostouDS. The boussinesq problem in dipolar gradient elasticity. Archiv Appl Mech2014; 84(9): 1373–1391.
NiiranenJKhakaloSBalobanovV, et al. Variational formulation and isogeometric analysis for fourth-order boundary value problems of gradient-elastic bar and plane strain/stress problems. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2016; 308: 182–211.
50.
AmanatidouEAravasN. Mixed finite element formulations of strain-gradient elasticity problems. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2002; 191(15): 1723–1751.
51.
Papargyri-BeskouSPolyzosDBeskosDE. Wave dispersion in gradient elastic solids and structures: a unified treatment. Int J Solid Struct2009; 46(21): 3751–3759.
52.
Papargyri-BeskouSTsepouraKGPolyzosD, et al. Bending and stability analysis of gradient elastic beams. Int J Solid Struct2003; 40(2): 385–400.
53.
GiannakopoulosAEStamoulisK. Structural analysis of gradient elastic components. Int J Solid Struct2007; 44(10): 3440–3451.
54.
LazopoulosKALazopoulosAK. Bending and buckling of thin strain gradient elastic beams. Eur J Mech Solid2010; 29(5): 837–843.
55.
ArtanRToksözA. Stability analysis of gradient elastic beams by the method of initial value. Archiv Appl Mech2013; 83(8): 1129–1144.
56.
LiangXHuSShenS. A new Bernoulli–Euler beam model based on a simplified strain gradient elasticity theory and its applications. Compos Struct2014; 111: 317–323.
57.
PegiosIPPapargyri-BeskouSBeskosDE. Finite element static and stability analysis of gradient elastic beam structures. Acta Mechanica2015; 226(3): 745–768.
58.
NiiranenJBalobanovVKiendlJ, et al. Variational formulations, model comparisons and numerical methods for Euler–Bernoulli micro- and nano-beam models. Math Mech Solid2017; 24(1): 312–335.
59.
IshaquddinMGopalakrishnanS. A novel weak form quadrature element for gradient elastic beam theories. Appl Math Modell2020; 77: 1–16.
SiderisSATsakmakisC. Consistent Euler—Bernoulli beam theories in statics for classical and explicit gradient elasticities. Compos Struct2022; 282: 115026.
62.
LazopoulosAK. Dynamic response of thin strain gradient elastic beams. Int J Mech Sci2012; 58(1): 27–33.
63.
AnsariRGholamiRRouhiH. Vibration analysis of single-walled carbon nanotubes using different gradient elasticity theories. Compos Part B: Eng2012; 43(8): 2985–2989.
64.
YayliMÖ. Free vibration behavior of a gradient elastic beam with varying cross section. Shock Vib2014; 2014: 801696.
65.
XuXJDengZC. Closed-form frequency solutions for simplified strain gradient beams with higher-order inertia. Eur J Mech Solid2016; 56: 59–72.
66.
YayliMÖ. A compact analytical method for vibration of micro-sized beams with different boundary conditions. Mech Adv Mater Struct2017; 24(6): 496–508.
67.
PegiosIPHatzigeorgiouGD. Finite element free and forced vibration analysis of gradient elastic beam structures. Acta Mechanica2018; 229(12): 4817–4830.
68.
JiangJWangL. Analytical solutions for the thermal vibration of strain gradient beams with elastic boundary conditions. Acta Mechanica2018; 229(5): 2203–2219.
69.
LazopoulosKALazopoulosAK. On a strain gradient elastic Timoshenko beam model. ZAMM—J Appl Math Mech2011; 91(11): 875–882.
70.
TriantafyllouAGiannakopoulosAE. Structural analysis using a dipolar elastic Timoshenko beam. Eur J Mech Solid2013; 39: 218–228.
71.
WuJXLiXFCaoWD. Flexural waves in multi-walled carbon nanotubes using gradient elasticity beam theory. Comput Mater Sci2013; 67: 188–195.
72.
YaghoubiSTMousaviSMPaavolaJ. Strain and velocity gradient theory for higher-order shear deformable beams. Archiv Appl Mech2015; 85(7): 877–892.
73.
BalobanovVNiiranenJ. Locking-free variational formulations and isogeometric analysis for the Timoshenko beam models of strain gradient and classical elasticity. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2018; 339: 137–159.
74.
KhakaloSBalobanovVNiiranenJ. Modelling size-dependent bending, buckling and vibrations of 2D triangular lattices by strain gradient elasticity models: applications to sandwich beams and auxetics. Int J Eng Sci2018; 127: 33–52.
75.
KhakaloSNiiranenJ. Lattice structures as thermoelastic strain gradient metamaterials: evidence from full-field simulations and applications to functionally step-wise-graded beams. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 177: 107224.
76.
LobontiuNGarciaE. Mechanics of microelectromechanical systems. New York: Springer, 2004.
77.
VoDSuttakulPRungamornratJ, et al. Static analysis of planar arbitrarily curved microbeams with the modified couple stress theory and Euler-Bernoulli beam model. Appl Math Modell2022; 112: 358–390.
78.
AuricchioFDa VeigaLBHughesTJR, et al. Isogeometric collocation methods. Math Model Method Appl Sci2010; 20(11): 2075–2107.
79.
VoDNanakornP. A total Lagrangian Timoshenko beam formulation for geometrically nonlinear isogeometric analysis of planar curved beams. Acta Mech2020; 231(7): 2827–2847.
80.
VoDLiXNanakornP, et al. An efficient isogeometric beam formulation for analysis of 2D non-prismatic beams. Eur J Mech Solid2021; 89: 104280.
81.
BorkovićAKovačevićSRadenkovićG, et al. Rotation-free isogeometric analysis of an arbitrarily curved plane Bernoulli–Euler beam. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2018; 334: 238–267.
YinHLaleECusatisG. Generalized formulation for the behavior of geometrically curved and twisted three-dimensional Timoshenko beams and its isogeometric analysis implementation. J Appl Mech2022; 89(7): 071003.
PieglLTilleW. The NURBS book. New York: Springer, 1996.
87.
Beirão, da, VeigaLLovadinaCRealiA. Avoiding shear locking for the Timoshenko beam problem via isogeometric collocation methods. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2012; 241-244: 38–51.
88.
AuricchioFBeirão, da, VeigaLKiendlJ, et al. Locking-free isogeometric collocation methods for spatial Timoshenko rods. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2013; 263: 113–126.
89.
AungZYVoDLeTM, et al. Analytical solution for circular microbeams with strain gradient elasticity. In: Proceedings of the 17th East Asian-Pacific conference on structural engineering and construction, 2022: EASEC-17, Singapore, 27–30 June 2022.
90.
RealiAGomezH. An isogeometric collocation approach for Bernoulli–Euler beams and Kirchhoff plates. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2015; 284: 623–636.
