Among the most characteristic structures in historical constructions for crossing large spans are the masonry vaulted structures by utilizing their geometric stability to safely transfer the loads to supports with regard to their negligible tensile strength. The ability of masonry piers to bear such transferred stresses and safely convey them to the support is directly related to their structural integrity, as well as to a number of other factors. Using an in-house limit analysis code, a study on the crucial parameters impacting the safety level of piers under the thrust of arches is performed. Parameters such as pier texture, joint friction angle, and arch shallowness, namely, shallow, semi-circular, and pointed arches, were investigated under three load scenarios: horizontal and concentrated vertical live load applied at mid-span and quarter-span. The main findings of this work show that all studied parameters have a significant influence on the structure response. Higher friction values, sharper arches, and piers that follow the rule of art result in higher collapse multipliers. Furthermore, this work emphasizes the importance of accounting for the sliding mechanism and masonry texture, parameters that are often neglected.
SaydanMUnalAKeskinUS, et al. An investigation of the current situation of the Msrloğlu bridge and possible damages after freeze-thaw by using finite elements analysis, Sille – Konya (Central Anatolia, Turkey). Eng Fail Anal2020; 117: 104788, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630719319314
PreciadoASantosJCSilvaC, et al. Seismic damage and retrofitting identification in unreinforced masonry churches and bell towers by the September 19, 2017 (mw = 7.1) Puebla-Morelos earthquake. Eng Fail Anal2020; 118: 104924, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350630720314485
ValenteMMilaniG.Damage assessment and partial failure mechanisms activation of historical masonry churches under seismic actions: Three case studies in Mantua. Eng Fail Anal2018; 92: 495–519, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S1350630718304126
GizziFTSileoMBiscioneM, et al. The conservation state of the Sassi of Matera site (Southern Italy) and its correlation with the environmental conditions analysed through spatial analysis techniques. J Cult Herit2016; 17: 61–74, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1296207415000928
14.
GallipoliMLupoM.Caratterizzazione dei terreni e risposta sismica locale dellíarea urbana di Matera (Tecniche speditive per la stima dellíamplificazione sismica e della dinamica degli edifici Studi teorici ed applicazioni professionali a cura di Marco Mucciarelli). Rome: ARACNE Editrice, 2012, pp. 323–342.
15.
BaggioCTrovalusciP.Stone assemblies under in-plane actions. Comparison between nonlinear discrete approaches. Comput Methods Struct Mason1995; 3: 184–193.
16.
EfesiouI. Constructional analysis of the local structural system of the historic settlement of Anavatos in Chios island. In: International seminar of restoration of historic buildings in seismic areas: the case of settlements in the Aegean, Lesvos Island, 24–26 May 2001, pp. 149–154. Athens: European Centre on Prevention and Forecasting for Earthquakes.
GiuffrèACarocciC.Codice di pratica per la sicurezza e la conservazione dei sassi di matera. Venice: La Bautta, 1997.
19.
CarocciCF.Guidelines for the safety and preservation of historical centres in seismic areas (Historical constructions). Guimarães: University of Minhi, 2001.
PulatsuBErdogmusEBretasEM, et al. In-plane static response of dry-joint masonry arch-pier structures. In: Proceedings of the Architectural Engineering Conference 2019, Tysons, VA, 3–6 April 2019, pp. 240–248. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784482261.028
23.
DimitriRDe LorenzisLZavariseG.Numerical study on the dynamic behavior of masonry columns and arches on buttresses with the discrete element method. Eng Struct2011; 33(12): 3172–3188, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0141029611003336
HuaYMilaniG.Rigid block limit analysis of masonry arches with associated and non-associated slides. In: MilaniGSarhosisV (eds) From corbel arches to double curvature vaults: analysis, conservation and restoration of architectural heritage masonry structures. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 169–203.
NelaBRiosAJPingaroM, et al. Limit analysis of locally reinforced masonry arches. Eng Struct2022; 271: 114921.
30.
NelaBRiosAJPingaroM, et al. Masonry arches simulations using cohesion parameter as code enrichment for limit analysis approach. Int J Mason Res Innov. Epub ahead of print 5May2023. DOI: 10.1504/ijmri.2023.10053576.
CocciaSDi CarloFRinaldiZ.Collapse displacements for a mechanism of spreading-induced supports in a masonry arch. Int J Adv Struct Eng2015; 7(3): 307–320, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40091-015-0101-x
41.
BaggioCTrovalusciP.Limit analysis for no-tension and frictional three-dimensional discrete systems. Mech Structures Mach1998; 26(3): 287–304. 10.1080/08905459708945496
42.
BaggioCTrovalusciP.Collapse behaviour of three-dimensional brick-block systems using non-linear programming. Struct Eng Mech2000; 10(2): 181–195.
DruckerDC.A more fundamental approach to plastic stress-strain relations. In: Proceedings of the first US National Congress on Applied Mechanics, Chicago, IL, 11–16 June 1951, pp. 487–491. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
45.
CoulombCA.Essai sur une application des régles de maximis & minimis á quelques problémes de Statique, relatifs á l’architecture. Paris: De l’Imprimerie Royale, 1773.
46.
DruckerDC.Coulomb friction, plasticity, and limit loads. J Appl Mech Trans ASME1954; 21: 71–74.
47.
RadenkovicD.Théorèmes limites pour un matériau de Coulomb á dilation non standardisée. C R Hebd Séances Acad Sci1961; 252(26): 4103.
48.
PepeMSangirardiMRecciaE, et al. Discrete and continuous approaches for the failure analysis of masonry structures subjected to settlements. Front Built Environ2020; 6: 43.
49.
PepeM.Numerical modeling for masonry: ALMA 2.0, a computational code for the limit analysis of historical masonry structures. PhD Thesis, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, 2020.
AhrensJGeveciBLawC.36 - Paraview: an end-user tool for large-data visualization. In: HansenCDJohnsonCR (eds) Visualization handbook. Burlington, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005, pp. 717–731.
52.
RomanoA.Modelling, analysis and testing of masonry structures. PhD Thesis, Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, 2006, http://www.fedoa.unina.it/id/eprint/675
53.
AitaDBarsottiRBennatiS.Equilibrium of pointed, circular, and elliptical masonry arches bearing vertical walls. J Struct Eng2012; 138(7): 880–888.
54.
LengyelGBagiK.Horizontal reaction components of pointed vaults. Int J Mason Res Innov2016; 1(4): 398–420.
RahmanAUedaT.Experimental investigation and numerical modeling of peak shear stress of brick masonry mortar joint under compression. J Mater Civ Eng2014; 26(9): 04014061.
SinopoliA. The role of geometry in the theories on vaulted structures by Lorenzo Mascheroni (1785). In:
Proceedings of the first international congress on construction history, vol. 3, Madrid, 20–24 January 2003, pp. 1865–1873. Madrid: Instituto Juan de Herrera, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura.
