A linear composite material (CM) consisting of a homogeneous matrix with either the periodic or random set of heterogeneities is considered. One of the first reduced-order models (ROMs), Transformation Field Analysis (TFA) by Dvorak for the pair strain-eigenstrain (or stress-eigenstress) is modified in terms of the “mixed” pair strain-eigenstress (or stress-eigenstrain) for implementation to clustering-based ROMs initiated by the self-consistent clustering analysis (SCA) by WK Liu. A set of consistency conditions are obtained for both the effective properties and modified eigenfield concentration factors. It is found that modified TFA represents a unified background of all three central clustering-based ROMs: the SCA, virtual clustering analysis (VCA), and finite element analysis–clustering analysis (FCA). One presents the scheme of estimation of inhomogeneous strain concentration factors in some prescribed clusters analyzed by the SCA (nonlinear problem). For statistically homogeneous CMs, a localized version of the modified TFA is proposed for clustering of the matrix (coating) in the vicinity of inclusions. VCA used for the analysis of a finite size inclusion can be modified for the implementation of a combination of both the modified TFA and functional gradient theory.
FishJ.Practical multiscaling. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
2.
GhoshS.Micromechanical analysis and multi-scale modeling using the Voronoi cell finite element method (computational mechanics and applied analysis). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2011.
3.
SejnohaMZemanJ.Micromechanics in practice. Southampton: WIT Press, 2013.
4.
ZohdiTIWriggersP.Introduction to computational micromechanics. Berlin: Springer, 2008.
5.
BuryachenkoVA.Micromechanics of heterogeneous materials. New York: Springer, 2007.
MoulinecHSuquetP.A fast numerical method for computing the linear and nonlinear mechanical properties of composites. C R Acad Sci Paris II1994; 318: 1417–1423.
16.
DvorakG.Transformation field analysis of inelastic composite materials. Proc R Soc Lond A1992; 437: 311–327.
17.
DvorakGJBenvenisteY.On transformation strains and uniform fields in heterogeneous media. Proc R Soc Lond A1992; 437: 291–310.
18.
DvorakGBahei-El-DinYWafaA.The modeling of inelastic composite materials with the transformation field analysis. Modelling Simul Mater Sci Eng1994; 2: 571–586.
19.
MichelJSuquetP.Nonuniform transformation field analysis. Int J Solids Struct2003; 40: 6937–6955.
20.
MichelJSuquetP.Computational analysis of nonlinear composite structures using the nonuniform transformation field analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2004; 193(48–51): 5477–5502.
21.
BerkoozGHolmesPLumleyJL.The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech1993; 25: 539–575.
22.
LadevézePPassieuxJCNéronD.The LATIN multiscale computational method and the proper generalized decomposition. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2010; 199: 1287–1296.
23.
BoyavalS.Reduced-basis approach for homogenization beyond the periodic setting. Multiscale Model Simul2008; 7: 466–494.
24.
HernándezJAOliverJHuespeA, et al. High-performance model reduction techniques in computational multiscale homogenization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2014; 276: 149–189.
25.
HernándezJACaicedoMAFerrerA.Dimensional hyper-reduction of nonlinear finite element models via empirical cubature. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2017; 313: 687–722.
26.
Van TuijlRAHarnishCMatoušK, et al. Wavelet based reduced order models for microstructural analyses. Comput Mech2019; 63: 535–554.
27.
LiuZBessaMALiuWK.Self-consistent clustering analysis: an efficient multi-scale scheme for inelastic heterogeneous materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2016; 306: 319–341.
28.
LiuZFlemingMLiuWK.Microstructural material database for self-consistent clustering analysis of elastoplastic strain softening materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2018; 330: 547–577.
29.
LiuZKafkaOLYuC, et al. Data-driven self-consistent clustering analysis of heterogeneous materials with crystal plasticity. In: OñateEPericDDe Souza NetoE, et al. (eds) Advances in computational plasticity. Berlin: Springer2018, pp. 221–242.
30.
KafkaOLYuCShakoorM, et al. Data-driven mechanistic modeling of the influence of microstructure on high-cycle fatigue life of nickel titanium. JOM2018; 70: 1154–1158.
31.
YuCKafkaOLLiuWK.Self-consistent clustering analysis for multiscale modeling at finite strains. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2019; 349: 339–359.
32.
HanXGaoJFlemingM, et al. Efficient multiscale modeling for woven composites based on self-consistent clustering analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2020; 364: 112929.
33.
HeCGaoJLiH, et al. A data-driven self-consistent clustering analysis for the progressive damage behavior of 3D braided composites. Compos Struct2020; 249: 112471.
34.
TangSZhangLLiuWK.From virtual clustering analysis to self-consistent clustering analysis: a mathematical study. Comput Mech2018; 62: 1443–1460.
35.
ZhangLTangSYuC, et al. Fast calculation of interaction tensors in clustering-based homogenization. Comput Mech2019; 64: 351–364.
36.
ChengGLiXNieY, et al. FEM-cluster based reduction method for efficient numerical prediction of effective properties of heterogeneous material in nonlinear range. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2019; 348: 157–184.
37.
LiHKafkaOLGaoJ, et al. Clustering discretization methods for generation of material performance databases in machine learning and design optimization. Comput Mech2019; 64: 281–305.
38.
MuraT.Micromechanics of defects in solids. Berlin: Springer, 1987.
39.
HillR.Elastic properties of reinforced solids: some theoretical principles. J Mech Phys Solids1963; 11: 357–372.
MoulinecHSuquetP.Numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1998; 157: 69–94.
43.
MichelJCMoulinecHSuquetP.A computational method based on augmented Lagrangians and fast Fourier transforms for composites with high contrast. Comput Model Eng Sci2000; 1(2): 79–88.
44.
KachanovM.Elastic solids with many cracks: a simple method of analysis. Int J Solids Struct1987; 23: 23–43.
45.
KachanovM.Elastic solids with many cracks and related problems. Adv Appl Mech1993; 30: 259–445.
46.
BuryachenkoVARammerstorferFGPlankensteinerAF.A local theory of elastoplastic deformation of two-phase metal matrix random structure composites. ASME J Appl Mech2002; 69: 489–496.
47.
BuryachenkoVBraginskyM. Transformation field analysis in the self-consistent clustering discretization method in micromechanics of composites. In: ASME 2022 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, Columbus, OH, 30 October–3 November 2022, p. IMECE2022-95138. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
48.
RayleighL.On the influence of obstacles arranged in rectangular order upon the properties of a medium. Phil Mag1892; 34: 481–502.
49.
BuryachenkoV.Critical analysis of generalized Maxwell homogenization schemes and related prospective problems. Mech Mater, 2022; 165: 104181.
50.
MacQueenJ. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In:
Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, Berkeley, CA, 21 June–18 July 1965 and 27 December 1965–7 January 1966, pp. 281–297. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
51.
ForgyE. Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency vs. Interpretability of classification. Biometrics1965; 21: 768.
52.
ArthurDVassilvitskiiS. -means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, New Orleans, LA, 7–9 January 2007, pp. 1027–1035. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
53.
CelebiMEKingraviHAVelaPA.A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm. Expert Syst Appl2013; 40: 200–210.
54.
LloydS.Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Trans Inf Theory1982; 28: 129–136.
