By considering the surface free energy effect, an analytical investigation on the fracture behaviors of nanoparticle-reinforced composites was performed in this study. The plastic zones ahead of the crack tips based on the Irwin model were introduced in our analysis, which has a significant influence on the fracture toughness of inelastic structures, especially for polymer and metal matrix composites. Take copper and aluminum nanoparticles as examples, comprehensive parametric studies were conducted to investigate the interaction between a Griffith crack and the nearby nanoparticle. It was found that for nanoparticles with the radius of less than 10 nm, apart from the mechanical property of the nanoparticle, the surface free energy effect plays a dominant role in determining the fracture behaviors of the nanoparticle-reinforced composites. Moreover, taking the surface free energy into account, a decrease in the plastic zone size is obtained, particularly for the crack tip nearer the nanoparticle.
WuQMiaoWZhangY, et al. Mechanical properties of nanomaterials: a review. Nanotechnol Rev2020; 9: 259–273.
3.
YaoZWangCLuR, et al. Fracture investigation of functionalized carbon nanotubes-grown carbon fiber fabrics/epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2020; 195: 108161.
4.
HanSMengQArabyS, et al. Mechanical and electrical properties of graphene and carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy adhesives: experimental and numerical analysis. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 120: 116–126.
5.
BishtADasguptaKLahiriD.Effect of graphene and CNT reinforcement on mechanical and thermomechanical behavior of epoxy-a comparative study. J Appl Polym Sci2018; 135(14): 46101.
6.
OhSTYoonSJChoaYH, et al. Wear behavior of nano-sized metal particle dispersed Al2O3 nanocomposite. Sci Eng Ceram III2006; 317–318: 369–372.
7.
DasSChandrasekaranMSamantaS.Comparison of mechanical properties of AA6061 reinforced with (SiC/B4C) micro/nano ceramic particle reinforcements. Mater Tod Proc2018; 5: 18110–18119.
8.
ItozakiH. Mechanical properties of composition modulated copper–palladium foils. PhD Thesis. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, 1982.
9.
StreitzFHCammarataRCSieradzkiK.Surface-stress effects on elastic properties I: thin metal films. Phys Rev B1994; 49: 10699–10706.
MillerREShenoyVB.Size-dependent elastic properties of nanosized structural elements. Nanotechnology2000; 11: 139–147.
12.
DingrevilleRQuJ.Surface free energy and its effect on the elastic behavior of nano-sized particles, wires and films. J Mech Phys Solid2005; 53: 1827–1854.
13.
DuanHLWangJHuangZP, et al. Size-dependent effective elastic constants of solids containing nano-inhomogeneities with interface stress. J Mech Phys Solid2005; 53: 1574–1596.
14.
DuanHLWangJHuangZP, et al. Stress concentration tensors of inhomogeneities with interface effects. Mech Mater2005; 37: 723–736.
15.
HuangZPWangJ. Micromechanics of nanocomposites with interface energy effect. In: LiSGaoX (eds) Handbook of micromechanics and nanocomposites. Singapore: Pan Stanford Pub, 2013.
16.
GaoXHuangZQuJ, et al. A curvature-dependent interfacial energy-based interface stress theory and its applications to nano-structured materials: (I) general theory. J Mech Phys Solid2014; 66: 59–77.
17.
GaoXHuangZP. Surface/interfacial energy theory of solids. In: AltenbachHÖchsnerA (eds) Encyclopedia of continuum mechanics. Berlin: Springer, 2020.
18.
AwajaFZhangSTripathiM, et al. Cracks, microcracks and fracture in polymer structures: formation, detection, autonomic repair. Prog Mater Sci2016; 83: 536-573.
19.
NaebeMAbolhasaniMMKhayyamH, et al. Crack damage in polymers and composites: a review. Polym Rev2016; 56: 31–69.
20.
FanMYiDKXiaoZM.A Zener-Stroh crack in fiber-reinforced composites with generalized Irwin plastic zone correction. Int J Mech Sci2014; 82: 81-89.
21.
FanMYiDKXiaoZM.Elastic–plastic stress investigation for an arc-shaped interface crack in composite material. Int J Mech Sci2014; 83: 104–111.
22.
HohHJXiaoZMLuoJ.On the plastic zone size and crack tip opening displacement of a Dugdale crack interacting with a circular inclusion. Acta Mechanica2010; 210: 305–314.
23.
HohHJXiaoZMLuoJ.Crack tip opening displacement of a Dugdale crack in a three-phase cylindrical model composite material. Int J Eng Sci2011; 49: 523-535.
24.
XiaoZMLuoJ.On the dynamic interaction between a penny-shaped crack and an expanding spherical inclusion in 3-D solid. Eng Fract Mech2004; 71: 1635–1649.
25.
ZemlyanovaAY.The effect of a curvature-dependent surface tension on the singularities at the tips of a straight interface crack. Q J Mech Appl Math2013; 66: 199–219.
26.
ZemlyanovaAY.Curvilinear mode-I/mode-II interface fracture with a curvature-dependent surface tension on the boundary. IMA J Appl Math2016; 81: 1112–1136.
27.
WiederhornSMFettTGuinJ-P, et al. Griffith cracks at the nanoscale. Int J Appl Glass Sci2013; 4: 76-86.
28.
ZhangYMZhangWGFanM, et al. On the mechanical behaviours of a craze in particulate–polymer composites. Philos Mag2018; 98: 1376–1396.
29.
XiaoZMChenBJ.Stress intensity factor for a Griffith crack interacting with a coated inclusion. Int J Fract2001; 108: 193–205.
30.
XiaoZMChenBJ.Stress analysis for a Zener-Stroh crack interacting with a coated inclusion. Int J Solid Struct2001; 38: 5007-5018.
31.
HillsDA.Solution of crack problems: the distributed dislocation technique. Kluwer: Dordrecht, 1996.
32.
WeertmanJ.Dislocation based fracture mechanics. Singapore: World Scientific, 1996.
33.
LiSLinG.Calculation of elastic constants of simple metals by pseudopotential method. Acta Physica Sinica1982; 31: 38-49.
34.
SchiotzJDi TollaFDJacobsenKW.Softening of nanocrystalline metals at very small grain sizes. Nature1998; 391: 561-563.
35.
SharmaPGantiS.Size-dependent Eshelby’s tensor for embedded nano-inclusions incorporating surface/interface energies. J Appl Mech Trans ASME2004; 71: 663–671.
36.
ErdoganFGuptaGD.Stresses near a flat inclusion in bonded dissimilar materials. Int J Solid Struct1972; 8: 533-547.
