The equilibrium forms of pantographic blocks in a three-point bending test are investigated via both experiments and numerical simulations. In the computational part, the corresponding minimization problem is solved with a deformation energy derived by homogenization within a class of admissible solutions. To evaluate the numerical simulations, series of measurements have been carried out with a suitable experimental setup guided by the acquired theoretical knowledge. The observed experimental issues have been resolved to give a robust comparison between the numerical and experimental results. Promising agreement between theoretical predictions and experimental results is demonstrated for the planar deformation of pantographic blocks.
TurcoEGiorgioIMisraA, et al. King post truss as a motif for internal structure of (meta)material with controlled elastic properties. R Soc Open Sci2017; 4: 171153.
4.
VangelatosZKomvopoulosKGrigoropoulosC.Vacancies for controlling the behavior of microstructured three-dimensional mechanical metamaterials. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(2): 511–524.
5.
VangelatosZMelissinakiVFarsariM, et al. Intertwined microlattices greatly enhance the performance of mechanical metamaterials. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(8): 2636–2648.
6.
VangelatosZGuGXGrigoropoulosCP.Architected metamaterials with tailored 3D buckling mechanisms at the microscale. Extreme Mech Lett2019; 33: 100580.
7.
EugsterSdell’IsolaFSteigmannD.Continuum theory for mechanical metamaterials with a cubic lattice substructure. Math Mech Complex Syst2019; 7(1): 75–98.
8.
NejadsadeghiNPlacidiLRomeoM, et al. Frequency band gaps in dielectric granular metamaterials modulated by electric field. Mech Res Commun2019; 95: 96–103.
9.
BarchiesiESpagnuoloMPlacidiL.Mechanical metamaterials: A state of the art. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(1): 212–234.
10.
YuXZhouJLiangH, et al. Mechanical metamaterials associated with stiffness, rigidity and compressibility: A brief review. Prog Mater Sci2018; 94: 114–173.
11.
dell’IsolaFSeppecherPAlibertJJ, et al. Pantographic metamaterials: An example of mathematically driven design and of its technological challenges. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(4): 851–884.
12.
dell’IsolaFSeppecherPSpagnuoloM, et al. Advances in pantographic structures: Design, manufacturing, models, experiments and image analyses. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(4): 1231–1282.
13.
AlibertJJSeppecherPdell’IsolaF.Truss modular beams with deformation energy depending on higher displacement gradients. Math Mech Solids2003; 8(1): 51–73.
14.
dell’IsolaFAndreausUCazzaniA, et al. The complete works of Gabrio Piola: Volume II commented English translation. Cham: Springer, 2018.
15.
dell’IsolaFAndreausUPlacidiL.At the origins and in the vanguard of peridynamics, non-local and higher-gradient continuum mechanics: An underestimated and still topical contribution of Gabrio Piola. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(8): 887–928.
16.
dell’IsolaFDella CorteAEspositoR, et al. Some cases of unrecognized transmission of scientific knowledge: From antiquity to Gabrio Piola’s peridynamics and generalized continuum theories. In: AltenbachHForestS (eds.) Generalized continua as models for classical and advanced materials (Advanced Structured Materials, vol. 42). Cham: Springer, 2016, 77–128.
17.
AuffrayNdell’IsolaFEremeyevVA, et al. Analytical continuum mechanics à la Hamilton–Piola least action principle for second gradient continua and capillary fluids. Math Mech Solids2015; 20(4): 375–417.
18.
RahaliYGiorgioIGanghofferJ, et al. Homogenization à la Piola produces second gradient continuum models for linear pantographic lattices. Int J Eng Sci2015; 97: 148–172.
19.
PideriCSeppecherP.A second gradient material resulting from the homogenization of an heterogeneous linear elastic medium. Continuum Mech Thermodyn1997; 9(5): 241–257.
20.
Abdoul-AnzizHSeppecherP.Strain gradient and generalized continua obtained by homogenizing frame lattices. Math Mech Complex Syst2018; 6(3): 213–250.
21.
Abdoul-AnzizHSeppecherPBellisC.Homogenization of frame lattices leading to second gradient models coupling classical strain and strain-gradient terms. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(12): 3976–3999.
22.
dell’IsolaFGiorgioIPawlikowskiM, et al. Large deformations of planar extensible beams and pantographic lattices: Heuristic homogenization, experimental and numerical examples of equilibrium. Proc R Soc London, Ser A2016; 472(2185): 20150790.
23.
CuomoMdell’IsolaFGrecoL.Simplified analysis of a generalized bias test for fabrics with two families of inextensible fibres. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(3): 61.
24.
dell’IsolaFCuomoMGrecoL, et al. Bias extension test for pantographic sheets: Numerical simulations based on second gradient shear energies. J Eng Math2017; 103(1): 127–157.
25.
PlacidiLGrecoLBucciS, et al. A second gradient formulation for a 2D fabric sheet with inextensible fibres. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(5): 114.
26.
SpagnuoloMBarczKPfaffA, et al. Qualitative pivot damage analysis in aluminum printed pantographic sheets: Numerics and experiments. Mech Res Commun2017; 83: 47–52.
27.
AndreausUSpagnuoloMLekszyckiT, et al. A Ritz approach for the static analysis of planar pantographic structures modeled with nonlinear Euler–Bernoulli beams. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2018; 30(5): 1103–1123.
28.
De AngeloMSpagnuoloMD’AnnibaleF, et al. The macroscopic behavior of pantographic sheets depends mainly on their microstructure: Experimental evidence and qualitative analysis of damage in metallic specimens. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31: 1181–1203.
29.
GiorgioI.Numerical identification procedure between a micro-Cauchy model and a macro-second gradient model for planar pantographic structures. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(4): 95.
30.
PlacidiLAndreausUGiorgioI.Identification of two-dimensional pantographic structure via a linear D4 orthotropic second gradient elastic model. J Eng Math2017; 103(1): 1–21.
31.
YangHGanzoschGGiorgioI, et al. Material characterization and computations of a polymeric metamaterial with a pantographic substructure. Z Angew Math Phys2018; 69(4): 105.
32.
De AngeloMBarchiesiEGiorgioI, et al. Numerical identification of constitutive parameters in reduced-order bi-dimensional models for pantographic structures: Application to out-of-plane buckling. Arch Appl Mech2019; 89(7): 1333–1358.
33.
NejadsadeghiNDe AngeloMDrobnickiR, et al. Parametric experimentation on pantographic unit cells reveals local extremum configuration. Exp Mech2019; 59(6): 927–939.
34.
SolyaevYLurieSBarchiesiE, et al. On the dependence of standard and gradient elastic material constants on a field of defects. Math Mech Solids2020; 25(1): 35–45.
35.
TurcoE. How the properties of pantographic elementary lattices determine the properties of pantographic metamaterials. In: AbaliBAltenbachHdell’IsolaF, et al. (eds.) New achievements in continuum mechanics and thermodynamics (Advanced Structured Materials, vol. 108). Cham: Springer, 2019, 489–506.
36.
SteigmannDJdell’IsolaF.Mechanical response of fabric sheets to three-dimensional bending, twisting, and stretching. Acta Mech Sin2015; 31(3): 373–382.
37.
Della GiorgioICorteAdell’IsolaF, et al. Buckling modes in pantographic lattices. CR Mec2016; 344(7): 487–501.
38.
GiorgioIRizziNLTurcoE.Continuum modelling of pantographic sheets for out-of-plane bifurcation and vibrational analysis. Proc R Soc London, Ser A2017; 473(2207): 20170636.
39.
ScerratoDGiorgioIRizziNL.Three-dimensional instabilities of pantographic sheets with parabolic lattices: Numerical investigations. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(3): 53.
40.
NiiranenJNiemiAH.Variational formulations and general boundary conditions for sixth-order boundary value problems of gradient-elastic Kirchhoff plates. Eur J Mech A Solids2017; 61: 164–179.
41.
KhakaloSBalobanovVNiiranenJ.Modelling size-dependent bending, buckling and vibrations of 2D triangular lattices by strain gradient elasticity models: Applications to sandwich beams and auxetics. Int J Eng Sci2018; 127: 33–52.
42.
KhakaloSNiiranenJ.Lattice structures as thermoelastic strain gradient metamaterials: Evidence from full-field simulations and applications to functionally step-wise-graded beams. Composites Part B2019; 177: 107224.
43.
BarchiesiEKhakaloS.Variational asymptotic homogenization of beam-like square lattice structures. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(10): 3295–3318.
44.
EremeyevV. Nonlinear micropolar shells: Theory and applications. In: PietraszkiewiczWSzymczakC (eds.) Shell Structures: Theory and Applications. London: Taylor & Francis, 2005, 11–18.
45.
EremeyevVALebedevLPAltenbachH.Foundations of micropolar mechanics. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
46.
EremeyevVAltenbachH. Basics of mechanics of micropolar shells. In: AltenbachHEremeyevV (eds.) Shell-like structures. Cham: Springer, 2017, 63–111.
47.
AltenbachHEremeyevVA. On the theories of plates based on the Cosserat approach. In: MauginGMetrikineA (eds.) Mechanics of generalized continua (Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics, vol 21). New York: Springer, 2010, 27–35.
48.
AltenbachHEremeyevVA.On the linear theory of micropolar plates. J Appl Math Mech2009; 89(4): 242–256.
49.
AltenbachHEremeyevVA. Cosserat-type shells. In: AltenbachHEremeyevVA (eds.) Generalized continua from the theory to engineering applications (CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (Courses and Lectures), vol. 541). Vienna: Springer, 2013, 131–178.
MisraAPoorsolhjouyP.Identification of higher-order elastic constants for grain assemblies based upon granular micromechanics. Math Mech Complex Syst2015; 3(3): 285–308.
52.
PlacidiLBarchiesiETurcoE, et al. A review on 2D models for the description of pantographic fabrics. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(5): 121.
53.
TurcoEGolaszewskiMCazzaniA, et al. Large deformations induced in planar pantographic sheets by loads applied on fibers: Experimental validation of a discrete Lagrangian model. Mech Res Commun2016; 76: 51–56.
54.
TurcoEBarczKPawlikowskiM, et al. Non-standard coupled extensional and bending bias tests for planar pantographic lattices. Part I: Numerical simulations. Z Angew Math Phys2016; 67(5): 122.
55.
TurcoEGolaszewskiMGiorgioI, et al. Pantographic lattices with non-orthogonal fibres: Experiments and their numerical simulations. Composites Part B2017; 118: 1–14.
56.
TurcoEMisraASarikayaR, et al. Quantitative analysis of deformation mechanisms in pantographic substructures: Experiments and modeling. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(1): 209–223.
57.
BattistaARosaLdell’ErbaR, et al. Numerical investigation of a particle system compared with first and second gradient continua: Deformation and fracture phenomena. Math Mech Solids2017; 22(11): 2120–2134.
58.
GrecoLGiorgioIBattistaA.In plane shear and bending for first gradient inextensible pantographic sheets: Numerical study of deformed shapes and global constraint reactions. Math Mech Solids2017; 22(10): 1950–1975.
59.
FranciosiPSpagnuoloMSalmanOU.Mean Green operators of deformable fiber networks embedded in a compliant matrix and property estimates. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31(1): 101–132.
60.
ChiaiaBBarchiesiEDe BiagiV, et al. A novel worst-case-based structural resilience index: Definition, computation and applications to portal frame structures. Mech Res Commun2019; 99: 52–57.
61.
BarchiesiEEugsterSRPlacidiL, et al. Pantographic beam: A complete second gradient 1D-continuum in plane. Z Angew Math Phys2019; 70(5): 135.
62.
SpagnuoloMAndreausU.A targeted review on large deformations of planar elastic beams: Extensibility, distributed loads, buckling and post-buckling. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(1): 258–280.
63.
GreenA.Micro-materials and multipolar continuum mechanics. Int J Eng Sc1965; 3(5): 533–537.
64.
MindlinRD.Second gradient of strain and surface-tension in linear elasticity. Int J Solids Struct1965; 1(4): 417–438.
65.
SedovLI.Mathematical methods for constructing new models of continuous media. Russ Math Surv1965; 20(5): 123.
66.
ToupinRA.Theories of elasticity with couple-stress. Arch Ration Mech Anal1964; 17(2): 85–112.
67.
GermainP.The method of virtual power in continuum mechanics. Part 2: Microstructure. SIAM J Appl Math1973; 25(3): 556–575.
68.
TurcoERizziNL.Pantographic structures presenting statistically distributed defects: Numerical investigations of the effects on deformation fields. Mech Res Commun2016; 77: 65–69.
69.
MisraALekszyckiTGiorgioI, et al. Pantographic metamaterials show atypical Poynting effect reversal. Mech Res Commun2018; 89: 6–10.
70.
JavanbakhtMBaratiE.Martensitic phase transformations in shape memory alloy: Phase field modeling with surface tension effect. Comput Mater Sci2016; 115: 137–144.
71.
MirzakhaniSJavanbakhtM.Phase field-elasticity analysis of austenite–martensite phase transformation at the nanoscale: Finite element modeling. Comput Mater Sci2018; 154: 41–52.
72.
dell’IsolaFLekszyckiTPawlikowskiM, et al. Designing a light fabric metamaterial being highly macroscopically tough under directional extension: First experimental evidence. Z Angew Math Phys2015; 66(6): 3473–3498.
73.
della CorteAGiorgioIScerratoD. Pantographic 2D sheets: Discussion of some numerical investigations and potential applications. Int J Non Linear Mech2016; 80: 200–208.
74.
FischerPKlassenMMergheimJ, et al. Isogeometric analysis of 2D gradient elasticity. Comput Mech2011; 47(3): 325–334.
75.
CuomoMContrafattoLGrecoL.A variational model based on isogeometric interpolation for the analysis of cracked bodies. Int J Eng Sci2014; 80: 173–188.
76.
CazzaniAMalagùMTurcoE.Isogeometric analysis: A powerful numerical tool for the elastic analysis of historical masonry arches. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2016; 28(1–2): 139–156.
77.
CazzaniAMalagùMTurcoE, et al. Constitutive models for strongly curved beams in the frame of isogeometric analysis. Math Mech Solids2016; 21(2): 182–209.
78.
CazzaniAMalagùMTurcoE.Isogeometric analysis of plane-curved beams. Math Mech Solids2016; 21(5): 562–577.
79.
CazzaniAStochinoFTurcoE.An analytical assessment of finite element and isogeometric analyses of the whole spectrum of Timoshenko beams. J Appl Math Mech2016; 96(10): 1220–1244.
80.
NiiranenJKhakaloSBalobanovV, et al. Variational formulation and isogeometric analysis for fourth-order boundary value problems of gradient-elastic bar and plane strain/stress problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2016; 308: 182–211.
81.
NiiranenJKiendlJNiemiAH, et al. Isogeometric analysis for sixth-order boundary value problems of gradient-elastic Kirchhoff plates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2017; 316: 328–348.
82.
NiiranenJBalobanovVKiendlJ, et al. Variational formulations, model comparisons and numerical methods for Euler–Bernoulli micro-and nano-beam models. Math Mech Solids2019; 24(1): 312–335.
83.
BalobanovVNiiranenJ.Locking-free variational formulations and isogeometric analysis for the Timoshenko beam models of strain gradient and classical elasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2018; 339: 137–159.
84.
KhakaloSNiiranenJ.Isogeometric analysis of higher-order gradient elasticity by user elements of a commercial finite element software. Comput-Aided Des2017; 82: 154–169.
85.
KhakaloSNiiranenJ.Anisotropic strain gradient thermoelasticity for cellular structures: Plate models, homogenization and isogeometric analysis. J Mech Phys Solids2020; 134: 103728.
86.
YaghoubiSTBalobanovVMousaviSM, et al. Variational formulations and isogeometric analysis for the dynamics of anisotropic gradient-elastic Euler–Bernoulli and shear-deformable beams. Eur J Mech A Solids2018; 69: 113–123.
YildizdagMEArdicITDemirtasM, et al. Hydroelastic vibration analysis of plates partially submerged in fluid with an isogeometric FE–BE approach. Ocean Eng2019; 172: 316–329.
89.
CapobiancoGEugsterSRWinandyT.Modeling planar pantographic sheets using a nonlinear Euler–Bernoulli beam element based on B-spline functions. Proc Appl Math Mech2018; 18: e201800220.
90.
GrecoLCuomoMContrafattoL.A reconstructed local formulation for isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shells. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2018; 332: 462–487.
91.
BalobanovVKiendlJKhakaloS, et al. Kirchhoff–Love shells within strain gradient elasticity: Weak and strong formulations and an H3-conforming isogeometric implementation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2019; 344: 837–857.
92.
EremeyevVAdell’IsolaFBoutinC, et al. Linear pantographic sheets: Existence and uniqueness of weak solutions. J Elast2018; 132(2): 175–196.
93.
LoveAEH.A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
