The article studies the stress–strain state of the spongy bone of an implanted jaw. A spongy bone can be considered as a multiporous area with its fissures and pores as the most visible components of a double-porous system. The work studies the stress–strain state of the spongy jaw-bone near the implant, which is under occlusal load. A mathematical model of the problem is the contact problem of the theory of elasticity between the implant and the jaw-bone. The problem is solved by using the boundary element methods, which are based on the solutions of Flamant (BEMF) and Boussinesq’s (BEMB) problems. The cases of various lengths of an implant diameter are considered. Stress contours (isolines) in the jaw-bone are drawn and the results obtained by BEMF and BEMB for the different-diameter implants are compared.
QianLTodoMMatsushitaY, et al. Finite element analysis of bone resorption around dental implant. J Biomech Sci Eng2009; 4: 365-376.
2.
TadaSStegaroiuRKitamuraE, et al. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implant2003; 18: 357-368.
3.
MannarinoFSFrancischoneCEJrde CarvalhoRS, et al. Analysis of the distribution of stress and deformation in single implant-supported prosthetic units in implants of different diameters. Rev Odontol UNESP2016; 45: 247-252.
4.
BaggiLCappelloniIDi GirolamoM, et al. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a threedimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthetic Dentist2008; 100: 422-431.
5.
StegaroiuRKusakariHNishiyamaS, et al. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1998; 13: 781–790.
6.
BhollaPJoLJVamsiK, et al. Influence of occlusal loading on stress patterns at the bone-implant interface by angulated abutments in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite-element study. J Dent Implant2014; 4: 3–10.
7.
MahasethPShettySSatish BabuCL, et al. Peri-implant stress analysis of immediate loading and progressive loading implants in different bone densities (D2 and D3) a finite element study. Int J Oral Implant Clin Res2014; 5: 1-7.
8.
HusseinMO.Stress-strain distribution at bone-implant interface of two splinted overdenture systems using 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodont2013; 5: 333–340.
9.
KorabiRShemtov-YonaKDorogoyA, et al. The failure envelope concept applied to the bone- dental implant system. Sci Rep2017; 7: 1-29.
10.
HerekarMGPatilVNMulaniSS, et al. The influence of thread geometry on biomechanical load transfer to bone: a finite element analysis comparing two implant thread designs. Dent Res J (Isfahan)2014; 11: 489–494.
11.
LekszyckiTdell’IsolaF. A mixture model with evolving mass densities for describing synthesis and resorption phenomena in bones reconstructed with bio-resorbable materials. ZAMM Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik2012; 92: 426-444.
12.
GiorgioIdell’IsolaFAndreausU, et al. On mechanically driven biological stimulus for bone remodeling as a diffusive phenomenon. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2019; 18: 1639–1663.
13.
GiorgioIAndreausUScerratoD, et al. Modeling of a non-local stimulus for bone remodeling process under cyclic load: application to a dental implant using a bioresorbable porous material. Math Mech Solid2017; 22: 1790–1805.
14.
GeorgeDAllenaRRémondY.A multiphysics stimulus for continuum mechanics bone remodeling. Math Mech Complex Syst2018; 6: 307-319.
15.
SheidaeiAKazempourMHasanabadiA, et al. Influence of bone microstructure distribution on developed mechanical energy for bone remodeling using a statistical reconstruction method. Math Mech Solid2019; 24: 3027-3041.
16.
GeorgeDAllenaRRémondY. Integrating molecular and cellular kinetics into a coupled continuum mechanobiological stimulus for bone reconstruction. Continuum Mech Thermodyn2019; 31: 725-740.
17.
GiorgioIAndreausUScerratoD, et al. A visco-poroelastic model of functional adaptation in bones reconstructed with bio-resorbable materials. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2016; 15: 1325–1343.
18.
AifantisEC. On the problem of diffusion in solids. Acta Mech1980; 37: 265-296.
19.
TimoshenkoSPGoodierJN. Theory of elasticity. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
20.
Sadd MartinH. Elasticity; theory, applications and numerics. 2nd ed.Amsterdam. Boston, Heodelberg, London, New. York, Oxford, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo: Elsevier, 2009.
21.
CowinSC. Survey article bone poroelasticity. J Biomech1999; 32: 217-238.
22.
BalMElsworthDRoegiersJ-C. Multiporosity\multipermeability approach to the simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs. Water Resour Res1993; 29: 1621–1633.
23.
NowackiW. Elasticity theory. Moscow: Mir, 1975 (in Russian).
24.
RabotnovYN. Mechanics of deformable solids. Moscow: Nauka, 1988 (in Russian).
25.
LurieAI. Theory of elasticity. Moscow: Nauka, 1970 (in Russian).
26.
BezukhovNI. Fundamentals of the theory of elasticity, plasticity and creep. Moscow: Vishaia Shkola, 1961 (in Russian).
27.
CrouchSLStarfieldAM. Boundary element methods in solid mechanics. London, Boston, Sydney: GEORGE, ALLEN & UNWIN, 1983.
