This paper deals with the derivation of mathematical models at the macroscale of biological tissues corresponding to angiogenesis phenomena. The derivation is obtained by mathematical description delivered at the microscale of cells using a kinetic theory approach. A classical Chapman–Enskog expansion properly truncated is used to obtain the desired result. It is shown that the approach is general enough to describe a broad variety of different angiogenesis models corresponding to well-defined assumptions on interactions at the cellular scale.
WeinbergRA. The Biology of Cancer. New York: Garland Sciences/Taylor and Francis, 2007.
2.
ZhengZKohGYJacksonT. A continuous model of angiogenesis initiation, extention, and maturation of new blood vessels modulated by vascular endothelial growth factor, angiopoietins, platelet-derived growth factor-b and Pericites. Disc Cont Dyn Syst B2012; 18: 1109–1154.
3.
BauerAJacksonTYiangYRohlfT. Receptor cross-talk angiogenesis: mapping environental cues to cell phenotype using a stochastic, boolean signaling network model, J Theoret Biol2010; 264: 838–846.
4.
AndersonARAChaplainMAJ. Continuous and discrete mathematical modeling of tumor induced angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol1998; 60: 857–899.
5.
LevineHAPamukSSleemanBDNilsen-HamiltonM. Mathematical modeling of capillary formation and development in tumor angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol2001; 63: 801–863.
6.
ManussakyD. A mechanochemical model of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. Model Numer Anal2003; 37: 581–599.
7.
BellouquidADe AngelisEKnopoffD. From the modeling of the immune hallmarks of cancer to a black swan in biology. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci2013; 23: 949–978.
8.
BellomoNBellouquidANietoJSolerJ. On the asymptotic theory from microscopic to macroscopic tissue models: an overview with perspectives. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci2012; 22: 1130001.
9.
PerthameB. Mathematical tools for kinetic equations, Bull Am Math Soc2004; 41: 205–244.
10.
BellomoNKnopoffDSolerJ. On the difficult interplay between life, “complexity”, and mathematical sciences. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci2013; 23: 1861–1913.
11.
OthmerHDunbarSRAltW. Models of dispersal in biological systems. J Math Biol1988; 26: 263–298.
12.
BellomoNBellouquidA. From a class of kinetic models to the macroscopic equations for multicellular systems in biology, Disc Cont Dyn Syst B2004; 4: 59–80.
13.
AlberMChenNLushnikovPMNewmanSA. Continuous macroscopic limit of a discrete stochastic model for interaction of living cells, Phys Rev Lett2007; 99: 168102.
14.
BellouquidADe AngelisE. From kinetic models of multicellular growing systems to macroscopic biological tissue models. Nonlin Anal Real World Appl2011; 12: 1111–1122.
15.
HillenTOthmerH. The diffusion limit of transport equations derived from velocity–jump processes. SIAM J Appl Math2000; 61: 751–775.
16.
LachowiczM. Links between microscopic and macroscopic descriptions. In Multiscale Problems in the Life Sciences (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 1940). Berlin: Springer, 2008, pp. 201–267.
17.
OthmerHHillenT. The diffusion limit of transport equations II: chemotaxis equations. SIAM J Appl Math2002; 62: 1222–1250.
18.
BellomoNBellouquidANietoJSolerJ. Multiscale biological tissue models and flux-limited chemotaxis from binary mixtures of multicellular growing systems. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci2010; 20: 1179–1207.
19.
KellerEFSegelLA. Traveling band of chemotactic bacteria:Atheoretical analysis. J Theoret Biol1971; 30: 235Ű-248.
20.
PatlakCS. Random walk with persistence and external bias. Bull Math Biol Biophys1953; 15: 311–Ű338.
21.
CarrilloJAYanB. An asymptotic preswerving scheme for the diffusive limit of kinetic systems for chemotaxis. Multiscale Model Sim2013; 11: 336–361.
22.
HillenTPainterKJ. A users guide to PDE models for chemotaxis. J Math Biol2009; 58: 183–217.
23.
Marciniak-CzochraAPtashnykM. Boundedness of solutions of a haptotaxis model. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci2010; 20: 449–476.
24.
PerthameBDalibardAL. Existence of solutions to the hyperbolic Keller–Segel model. Trans Am Math Soc2009; 361: 2319–2335.
25.
HanahanDWeinbergRA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell2000; 100: 57–70.
26.
NowakMA. Evolutionary Dynamics. Exploring the Equations of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006.
27.
AndersonARAChaplainMAJNewmanELSteeleRJCThompsonAM. Mathematical modelling of tumor invasion and methastasis, J Theoret Med2000; 2: 129–154.
28.
ChaplainMAJ. Mathematical modeling of angiogenesis. J Neuro-Oncol2000; 50: 37–51.
FolkmanJ. Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and methastasis. Sem Oncol2002; 29: 15-18.
31.
PrusaVRajagopalKR. On models for viscoelastic materials that are mechanically incompressible and thermally compressible or expansible and their Oberbeck–Boussinesq type approximations. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci2013; 23: 1761–1794.
32.
BellomoNMalekJ. Continuum thermodynamics and nonlinear partial differential equations. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci2011; 21: 1–6.
33.
AndreuA.CasellesV.MazónJ.M.MollS., Finite propagation speed for limited flux diffusion equations, Arch Rat Mech Anal2006; 182: 269–297.
34.
CalvoJMazonJMSolerJVerbeniM. Qualitative properties of the solutions of a nonlinear flux-limited equation arising in the transport of morphogens. Math Mod Meth Appl Sci2011; 21: 893–937.
35.
BellomoNBellouquidA. Derivation of new chemotaxis models by asymptotic analysis of kinetic models for large binary cell mixtures, Front Sci Eng [An International Journal Edited by Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology] 2014, in press.
36.
BellouquidA. Commentary to the paper “Morphogenetic action through flux-limited spreading”. Phys Life Rev2013; 7: 477–478.
37.
VerbeniM. Morphogenetic action through flux-limited spreading. Phys Life Rev2013; 10: 457–475.
38.
BrenierY. Extended Monge–Kantorovich theory. In CaffarelliLASalsaS (eds.), Optimal Transportation and Applications, Lectures given at the C.I.M.E. Summer School help in Martina Franca (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, no. 1813). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 91–122.
39.
BrenierY. Optimal transport, convection, magnetic relaxation and generalized Boussinesq equations. J Nonlin Sci2009; 19: 547–570.
40.
BurgerMDi FrancescoMDolak-StrussY. The Keller–Segel model for chemotaxis with prevention of overcrowding: linear vs. nonlinear diffusion. SIAM J Math Anal2006; 38: 1288–1315.
