Over the past two decades, significant information has become available that reveals the fundamental role of mechanical factors in controlling the complex structure and function of many cell types. There is a pressing need, however, to synthesize these many observations via mathematical models, which have predictive capability and which suggest experiments that will provide increased insight and thus refinement of the models. In this paper, it is suggested that some of the salient mechanical behaviors exhibited by cells, including dynamic mechanosensitive changes therein, can be described using a simple constrained mixture model that has recently been proposed for describing tissue-level growth and remodeling. That is, strong similarities in structure-function relationships at multiple length scales—cell, tissue, and organ—may allow us to exploit common constitutive frameworks, which may prove advantageous in future attempts to model across the various scales.
[1] Alberts, B., Bray, D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K. and Watson, J. D.: Molecular Biology of the Cell, Garland Publishing, New York, 1994.
2.
[2] Bachrach, N. M., Valhmu, W. B., Stazzone, E., Ratcliffe, A., Lai, W. M. and Mow, V. C.: Changes in proteoglycan synthesis of chondrocytes in articular cartilage are associated with the time-dependent changes in their mechanical environment. J. Biomech., 28, 1561-1569 (1995).
3.
[3] Baer, A. E. and Setton, L. A.: The micromechanical environment of intervertebral disc cells: Effect of matrix anisotropy and cell geometry predicted by a linear model. ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 122, 245-251 (2000).
4.
[4] Beatty, M. F.: Topics in finite elasticity: Hyperelasticity of rubber, elastomers, and biological tissues with examples. Appl. Mech. Rev., 40, 1699-1734 (1987).
5.
[5] Beatty, M. F. and Zhou, Z.: Universal motions for a class of viscoelastic materials of differential type. Cont. Mech. Thermodyn., 3, 169-191 (1991).
6.
[6] Boey, S. K., Boal, D. H. and Discher, D. E.: Simulations of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton at large deformation. I Microscopic models. II. Micropipet aspiration. Biophys. J., 75, 1573-1597 (1998).
7.
[7] Coughlin, M. F. and Stamenović, D.: A tensegrity model of the cytoskeleton in spread and round cells. ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 120, 770-777 (1998).
[9] Dong, C. R., Skalak, R. and Sung, K. L. P.: Cytoplasmic rheology of passive neutrophils. Biorheol., 28, 557-567 (1991).
10.
[10] Fabry, B., Maksym, G. N., Butler, J. P., Glogauer, M., Navajas, D. and Fredberg, J. J.: Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87, 148102-1-148102-4 (2001).
11.
[11] Forgacs, G.: On the possible role of cytoskeletal filamentous networks in intracellular signaling: An approach based on percolation. J. Cell. Sci., 108, 2131-2143 (1995).
12.
[12] Fung, Y. C.: Biorheology of soft tissue. Biorheol., 10, 139-155 (1973).
13.
[13] Gibson, L. J. and Ashby, M. F.: Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1988.
14.
[14] Heidemann, S. R., Kaech, S., Buxbaum, R. E. and Matus, A.: Direct observations of the mechanical behaviors of the cytoskeleton in living fibroblasts. J. Cell. Biol., 145, 109-122 (1999).
15.
[15] Humphrey, J. D. and Yin, F. C. P.: A new constitutive formulation for characterizing the mechanical behavior of soft tissues. Biophys. J., 52, 563-570 (1987).
16.
[16] Humphrey, J. D.: Computer methods in membrane biomechanics. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 1, 171-210 (1998).
17.
[17] Humphrey, J. D.: Remodeling of a collagenous tissue at fixed lengths. ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 121, 591-597 (1999).
18.
[18] Humphrey, J. D.: Stress, strain and mechanotransduction in cells. ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 123, 638-641 (2001).
19.
[19] Humphrey, J. D.: Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002.
20.
[20] Humphrey, J. D. and Rajagopal, K. R.: A mixture model for growth and remodeling in soft tissues. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., at press (2002).
21.
[21] Ingber, D. E.: Tensegrity and the emergence of complex mechanical behavior in living cells. Mechanics in Biology ed J Casey and G Bao, ASME AMD vol 242, BED vol 46, 37-48 (2000).
22.
[22] Ingber, D. E., Heidemann, S. R., Lamoureux, P. and Buxbaum, R. E.: Opposing views on tensegrity as a structural framework for understanding cell mechanics. J. Appl. Physiol., 89, 1663-1678 (2000).
23.
[23] Janmey, P. A.: Mechanical properties of cytoskeletal polymers. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol., 3, 4-11 (1991).
24.
[24] Mow, V. C., Hochmuth, R. M., Guilak, F. and Trans-Son-Tay, R.: Cell Mechanics and Cellular Engineering, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.
25.
[25] Rajagopal, K. R. and Tao, L.: Mechanics of Mixtures, World Scientific, Singapore, 1995.
26.
[26] Rao, I. J., Humphrey, J. D. and Rajagopal, K. R.: Biological growth and remodeling: A uniaxial example with possible application to tendons and ligaments. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci., at press (2002).
27.
[27] Satcher, R. L. and Dewey Jr, C. F.: Theoretical estimates of mechanical properties of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. Biophys. J., 71, 109-118 (1996).
28.
[28] Schmid-Schönbein, G. W., Kosawada, T., Skalak, R. and Chien, S.: Membrane model of endothelial cells and leukocytes. A proposal for the origin of a cortical stress. ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 117, 171-178 (1995).
29.
[29] Skalak, R., Tozeren, A., Zarda, P. R. and Chien, S.: Strain energy function of red blood cell membranes. Biophys. J., 13, 245-264 (1973).
30.
[30] Stamenović, D. and Wang, N.: Cellular responses to mechanical stress. Invited review: Engineering approaches to cytoskeletal mechanics. J. Appl. Physiol., 89, 2085-2090 (2000).
31.
[31] Treloar, L. R. G.: The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.
32.
[32] Truesdell, C. and Noll, W.: The non-linear field theories of mechanics. Handbuch der Physik ed S Flugge, vol III/3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1965.
33.
[33] Volokh, K. Y., Vilnay, O. and Belsky, M.: Tensegrity architecture explains linear stiffening and predicts softening of living cells. J. Biomech., 33, 1543-1549 (2000).
34.
[34] Wendling, S., Oddou, C. and Isabey, D.: Stiffening response of a cellular tensegrity model. J. Theor. Biol., 196, 309-325 (1999).
35.
[35] Zahalak, G. I., McConnaughey, W. B. and Elson, E. L.: Determination of cellular mechanical properties by cell poking, with an application to leukocytes. ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 112, 283-294 (1990).
36.
[36] Zarda, P.R., Chien, S. and Skalak, R.: Elastic deformations of red blood cells. J. Biomech., 10, 211-221 (1977).
37.
[37] Zhu, C., Bao, G. and Wang, N.: Cell mechanics: Mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 2, 189-226 (2000).
