Media critics often complain about too much coverage of “horse-race” polls. A common assumption sustaining this criticism is that such coverage competes with issue coverage. We propose the opposite, that horse-race polls might increase voters' attention to other election messages, including issue information, which in turn leads to a better understanding of public policies. To test these competing theories, we conducted three studies during the 1992 presidential election: a controlled experiment, a statewide one-time survey, and a three-county two-wave panel survey. Each of the studies reports a positive relationship between horse-race polls and issue knowledge. The two surveys also report positive correlations between exposure or attention to polls and exposure or attention to general election coverage, which in turn is positively correlated with issue knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkin, Charles , and Martin Block. 1983. “Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers.”Journal of Advertising Research23(Feb.-Mar.):57-61.
2.
Auletta, Ken . 1993. “On and Off the Bus: Lessons from Campaign '92.” In 1-800-President (Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Television and the Campaign of 1992). New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
3.
Bartlett, Federic C. 1932. Remembering: An Experimental and Social Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bobrow, Daniel G. , and Donald Norman. 1975. “Some Principles of Memory Schemata.” In Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, ed. Daniel G. Bobrow and A.M. Collins. New York: Academic Press.
5.
Ceci, Stephen J. , and Edward L. Kain. 1982. “Jumping on the Bandwagon with the Underdog: The Impact of Attitude Polls on Polling Behavior.”Public Opinion Quarterly46(2):228-242.
6.
Chaffee, Steven , and Stacey Frank. 1996. “How Americans Get Political Information: Print versus Broadcast News.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546(July):48-58.
7.
Chaffee, Steven H. , and Joan Schleuder. 1986. “Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News.”Human Communication Research13(fall):76-107.
8.
Chaffee, Steven H. , Xinshu Zhao, and Glenn Leshner. 1994. “Political Knowledge and the Campaign Media of 1992.”Communication Research21(3):305-324.
9.
Clancy, Kevin J. , and David M. Kweskin. 1971. “Commercial Recall Correlates.”Journal of Advertising Research11(2):18-20.
10.
Cook, Stuart W. , and Alfred C. Welch. 1940. “Methods of Measuring the Practical Effect of Polls of Public Opinion.”Journal of Applied Psychology24(4):441-454.
11.
Downs, Anthony . 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
12.
Drew, Dan , and David Weaver. 1991. “Voter Learning in the 1988 Presidential Election: Did the Debates and the Media Matter?”Journalism Quarterly68(spring):22-37.
13.
Friedman, Hershey , and Linda Friedman. 1979. “Endorser Effectiveness by Product Type.”Journal of Advertising Research19(Oct.):63-71.
14.
Graber, Doris A. 1989. Mass Media and American Politics. 3rd Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
15.
Hollander, Barry . 1995. “The New News and the 1992 Presidential Campaign: Perceived versus Actual Political Knowledge.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72(4):786-798.
16.
Hsiao, Cheng . 1986. Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall . 1992. Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall . 1993. “The Subversive Effects of a Focus on Strategy in News Coverage in Presidential Campaigns.” In 1-800-President (Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Television and the Campaign of 1992). New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
19.
Kamen, Joseph , Abdul Azhari, and Judith Kragh. 1975. “What a Spokesman Does for a Sponsor.”Journal of Advertising Research15(Apr.):17-24.
20.
Kerbel, Matthew R. 1995. “The Media as Political News: Reflective Reporting of the 1992 U.S. Presidential Campaign.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Albuquerque, NM, May.
21.
Kern, Montegue . 1989. Thirty-Second Politics: Political Advertising in the Eighties. New York: Praeger.
22.
Kessel, John H. 1988. Presidential Campaign Politics: Coalition Strategies and Citizen Response. 3rd Edition. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
23.
Krugman, H.E.1983. “Television Program Interest and Commercial Interruption: Are Commercials on Interesting Programs Less Effective?”Journal of Advertising Research23(1):21-23.
24.
Lachman, Roy , Janet L. Lachman, and Earl C. Butterfield. 1979. Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Ladd, Everett Carll , and Andrew Kohut. 1997. Interview with XXX. Morning Edition. National Public Radio. Jan. 1. Transcripts through Lexis/Nexis.
26.
Lavrakas, Paul J. , Jack K. Holley, and Peter V. Miller. 1991. “Public Reactions to Polling News during the 1988 Presidential Election Campaign.” In Polling and Presidential Election Coverage, ed. Paul J. Lavrakas and Jack K. Holley. Newbury Park: Sage.
27.
Martinelli, Kathleen A. , and Steven H. Chaffee. 1995. “Measuring New Voter Learning via Three Channels of Political Information.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72(1):18-32.
28.
McCracken, Grant . 1989. “Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process.”Journal of Consumer Research16(3):310-321.
29.
McLeod, Jack M. , and Daniel McDonald. 1985. “Beyond Simple Exposure: Media Orientations and Their Impact on Political Processes.”Communication Research12(Jan.):3-34.
30.
McLeod, Jack M. , Zhongshi Guo, Katie Daily, Catherine A. Steele, Huiping Huang, Edward Horowitz, and Huailin Chen. 1996. “The Impact of Traditional and Nontraditional Media Forms in the 1992 Presidential Election,”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly73(2):401-416.
31.
Meyer, Philip . 1991. “Stop Pulling Punches with Polls.”Columbia Journalism Review (Nov.-Dec.):64-67.
32.
Meyer, Philip . 1993. “The Media Reformation: Giving the Agenda Back to the People.” In The Elections of 1992, ed. M. Nelson. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
33.
Meyer, Philip , and Deborah Potter. 1997. “Newspapers and Citizen-Based Journalism in the 1996 Elections: A Cross-Market Comparison.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Chicago, July.
34.
Navazio, Robert . 1977. “An Experimental Approach to Bandwagon Research.”Public Opinion Quarterly41(2):217-225.
35.
Neuman, W. Russell . 1996. “Political Communications Infrastructure.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 546(July):9-21.
36.
Ogilvy, David . 1985. Ogilvy on Advertising. New York: Vintage.
37.
Osgood, Charles . 1996. “The Osgood File: Should Voter Polls Be Banned?” CBS News Campaign 96 home page. Aug. 29. <http://www.cbsnews.com/cbsconv/view/?objoid=20be.2240>.
38.
Patterson, Thomas E. 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.
39.
Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf.
40.
Patterson, Thomas E. , and R. McClure. 1976. The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. New York: Putnam.
41.
Pedhazur, Elazar J. 1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. 2nd Edition. Fort Worth: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
42.
Swanson, David L. , and Dan D. Nimmo, eds. 1990. New Directions in Political Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Thorson, Esther . 1994. “Using Eyes-on-Screen as a Measure of Attention to Television.” In Measuring Cognitive Responses to Media Messages, ed. Annie Lang. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
Traugott, Michael W.1988. “Marketing the Presidency: Is There a Tyranny of Media Polls?”Gannett Center Journal2(fall):57-73.
45.
Traugott, Michael W. 1991. “Public Attitudes about News Organizations, Campaign Coverage and Polls.” In Polling and Presidential Election Coverage, ed. Paul J. Lavrakas and Jack K. Holley. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Traugott, Michael W. 1992. “The Impact of Media Polls on the Public.” In Media Polls in American Politics, ed. T.E. Mann and G.R. Orren. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
47.
Weaver, David H.1996. “What Voters Learn from Media.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science546(July):34-47.
48.
Weaver, David , and Dan Drew. 1993. “Voter Learning in the 1990 Off-Year Election: Did the Media Matter?”Journalism Quarterly70(2):356-368.
49.
Weaver, David , and Dan Drew. 1995. “Voter Learning in the 1992 Presidential Election: Did the `Non-Traditional' Media and Debates Matter?”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72(1):7-17.
50.
Zhao, Xinshu , and Glen L. Bleske. 1995. “Measurement Effects in Comparing Voter Learning from Television News and Campaign Advertisements.”Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly72(1):72-83.
51.
Zhao, Xinshu , and Steven H. Chaffee. 1995. “Campaign Advertisements and Television News as Sources of Political Issue Information.”Public Opinion Quarterly59(1):41-65.
52.
Zillman, Dolf . 1984. Connections between Sex and Aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
