Abstract
The range of places from which chief executives can communicate with the public, using modern media, is virtually limitless. This article explores examples from the Clinton and Major administrations and considers some of the factors affecting their communication choices. The substantial separation now of specific roles from specific places supports the claim that prime ministers are becoming more presidential, whereas public perceptions of the “real” chief executive seem likely in either system to become less, not more, clear.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
