Will cyberspace bring new forms of participatory democracy as computer-mediated communication reduces organizational costs? The Internet has the potential to change the nature of American electoral politics, but we doubt that it will. The character and popularity of cyberspace are more likely to foster an on-line electoral environment that replicates the real world, albeit in a slick electronic form. Notwithstanding the novelty and explosive growth of campaigning on the Internet, we foresee the Internet in general, and the World Wide Web in particular, as more likely to reinforce the existing structure of American politics than to change it.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Birdsall, David S. , Douglas Muzzio , Humphrey Taylor , and David Crane . 1996. “A New Political Marketplace: The Web Snares Voters.”Public Perspective7(4): 33-35 .
2.
Bonchek, Mark S. 1995. “Political Uses of the Internet.”Political Participation Project (http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/ppp/home.html).
3.
Caruso, Denise . 1996. “The Net Nobody Knows.”Utne Reader75 (May-June): 41-49 .
4.
Casey, Chris . 1996. The Hill on the Net: Congress Enters the Information Age. Boston: Academic Press .
5.
Conway, Margaret M. 1991. Political Participation in the United States. 2nd Edition. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press .
6.
Fisher, Bonnie , Michael Margolis , and David Resnick . 1996a. “Breaking Ground on the Virtual Frontier: Surveying Civic Life on the Internet.”American Sociologist27(1): 11-29 .
7.
Fisher, Bonnie , Michael Margolis , and David Resnick . 1996b. “Surveying the Internet: Democratic Theory and Civic Life in Cyberspace.”Southeastern Political Review24(3): 399-429 .
8.
Frendreis, John . 1994. “Voters, Government Officials, and Party Organizations: Connections and Distinctions.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary Parties, ed. Daniel M. Shea and John C. Green . Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
9.
Gilster, Paul . 1994. The Internet Navigator. 2nd Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons .
10.
Graber, Doris . 1996. “The `New' Media and Politics: What Does the Future Hold?”PS: Political Science and Politics29(1): 33-36 .
11.
Hiskes, Richard P.1996. “Acts of Democracy: Reconceptualizing Politics, Participation, and Competence.”Public Perspective7(4): 40-44 .
12.
Lowi, Theodore J. 1994. “Toward a Responsible Three-Party System.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary Parties, ed. Daniel M. Shea and John C. Green . Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield .
13.
Mann, Bill . 1995. Politics on the Net. Indianapolis: Que .
14.
McGookin, Stephen . 1995. “Internet `May Give Stimulus to Democracy'.”Financial Times, Dec. 27.
15.
Miller, Mark Crispin . 1996. “Free the Media.”The Nation22(262): 9-14 .
16.
Miller, Mark Crispin , and Janine Baquet Biden . 1996. “The National Entertainment State.”The Nation22 (262): 23-27 .
17.
Phillips, Kevin . 1995. “Virtual Washington.”Time145 (12): 65-68 .
18.
Polsby, Nelson , and Aaron Wildavsky . 1996. Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics. 9th Edition. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House .
19.
Rheingold, Howard . 1993. TheVirtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
20.
Schiffrin, André . 1996. “The Corporatization of Publishing.”The Nation, 22 (262): 29-32 .
