This article compares news making on television during recent national election campaigns in the United States, Britain, and Germany and focuses on one of the most interesting problems confronting news professionals in modern democracies at election time: the concept of balance. The principle of balance conflicts with the principle of objectivity. Television news professionals are thus faced with a dilemma at election time: how to report the campaign impartially while adhering to news values as the basis for story selection. This article shows that this dilemma is resolved differently in each country, based on data from observation and interviews in TV newsrooms as well as content analysis of main evening news coverage during the final weeks of recent election campaigns. The article argues that the way in which the dilemma is resolved in each country is influenced by journalistic culture, itself shaped by systemic factors, institutional rules, and political culture.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, Gabriel , and Sidney Verba . 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
2.
Almond, Gabriel , and Sidney Verba . 1974. The Civic Culture Revisited. Boston: Little, Brown .
3.
Baker, Kendall L. , and Helmut Norpoth . 1981. “Candidates on Television: The 1972 Electoral Debates in West Germany.”Public Opinion Quarterly45(3) 329-345 .
4.
Baker, Kendall L. , Russell J. Dalton , and Kai Hildebrandt . 1980. Germany Transformed: Political Culture and the New Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
5.
Bennett, W. Lance . 1988. News: The Politics of Illusion. New York: Longman .
6.
Blumler, Jay G. 1969. “Producers' Attitudes towards Television Coverage of an Election Campaign: A Case Study.” In The Sociology of Mass-Media Communicators, ed. Paul Halmos . Keele, U.K.: University of Keele .
7.
Blumler, Jay G. 1983. “Communication and Turnout.” In Communicating to Voters: Television in the First European Parliamentary Elections, ed. Jay G. Blumler . London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
8.
Blumler, Jay G. , and T.J. Nossiter . 1991. Broadcasting Finance in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
9.
Blumler, Jay G. , and Holli A. Semetko . 1987. “Mass Media and Legislative Campaigns in a Unitary Parliamentary Democracy: The Case of Britain.”Legislative Studies Quarterly12 (3): 415-444 .
10.
Blumler, Jay G. , Michael Gurevitch , and T.J. Nossiter . 1986. “Setting the Television News Agenda: Campaign Observation at the BBC.” In Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1983, ed. Ivor Crewe and Martin Harrop . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
11.
Blumler, Jay G. , Michael Gurevitch , and T.J. Nossiter . 1989. “The Earnest vs. the Determined: Election Newsmaking at the BBC, 1987.” In Political communications: The General Election Campaign of 1987, ed. Ivor Crewe and Martin Harrop . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
12.
Blumler, Jay G. , Michael Gurevitch , and T.J. Nossiter . 1995. “Struggles for Meaningful Election Communication: Television Journalism at the BBC, 1992.” In Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1992, ed. Ivor Crewe and Brian Gosschalk . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
13.
Blumler, Jay G. , Jack M. McLeod , and Karl Erik Rosengren . 1992. “An Introduction to Comparative Communication Research.” In Comparatively Speaking: Communication and Culture across Space and Time, ed. Jay G. Blumler , Jack M. McLeod , and Karl Erik Rosengren . Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
14.
Broadcasting Laws. 1979. Bonn: Internationes. [Documents on Politics and Society in the Federal Republic of Germany.]
15.
Butler, David , and Anthony King , eds. 1965. The British General Election of 1964. London: Macmillan .
16.
Butler, David , and Austin Ranney , eds. 1992. Electioneering: A Comparative Study of Continuity and Change. Oxford: Clarendon .
17.
Curtice, John , and Holli Semetko . 1994. “Does It Matter What the Papers Say?” In Labour's Last Chance?, ed. Anthony Heath , Roger Jowell , and John Curtice . Aldershot, U.K.: Dartmouth .
18.
Dogan, Mattei , and Dominique Pelassy . 1984. How to Compare Nations. Chatham Hill, NJ: Chatham House .
19.
Eulau, Heinz . 1986. Politics, Self and Society: A Theme and Variation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
20.
Gans, Herbert J. 1980. Deciding What's News. New York: Vintage .
21.
Graber, Doris A. 1991. “The Mass Media and Election Campaigns in the United States of America.” In Media, Elections and Democracy, ed. Frederick J. Fletcher . Toronto: Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Finance/Dundurn .
22.
Graber, Doris A. 1993. Mass Media and American Politics. Washington D.C.: Congressional Quarterly .
23.
Grossman, Lawrence K. 1990. “Reflections on Television's Role in American Presidential Elections.”Shorenstein Center on the Press , Politics and Public Policy Monograph.
24.
Gurevitch, Michael , and Jay G. Blumler . 1982. “The Construction of Election News: An Observation Study at the BBC.” In Individuals in Mass Media Organizations: Creativity and Constraint, ed. James S. Ettema and D. Charles Whitney . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
25.
Inglehart, Ronald . 1977. The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
26.
Inglehart, Ronald . 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
27.
Kaase, Max . 1983. Sinn oder Unsinn des Konzepts “Politische Kultur.” In Wahlen und politisches System, ed. Max Kaase and Hans-Dieter Klingemann . Opladen: Westdeutcher Verlag .
28.
Kaase, Max . 1987. “On the Meaning of Electoral Change.”Political Studies35(3): 482-490 .
29.
Kalb, Marvin . 1991. “Introduction.” In Campaign Lessons for '92. Cambridge, MA: Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University .
30.
Kohn, Melvin L. 1989. “Cross-national Research as an Analytic Strategy.” In Cross-national Research in Sociology, ed. M.L. Kohn . Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
31.
McQuail, Denis . 1993. Media Performance. London and Newbury Park: Sage .
32.
Miller, William L. , Harold D. Clarke , Martin Harrop , Lawrence Leduc , and Paul F. Whiteley . 1990. How Voters Change: The 1987 British Election Campaign in Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon .
33.
Neuman, W. Russell . 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
34.
Neuman, W. Russell , Marion Just , and Ann N. Crigler . 1992. Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
35.
Norpoth, Helmut , and Kendall L. Baker . 1980. “Mass Media Use and Electoral Choice in West Germany.”Comparative Politics13(1) 1-14 .
36.
Nossiter, T.J. , Margaret Scammell , and Holli A. Semetko . 1995. “Old Values versus News Values.” In Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1992, ed. Ivor Crewe and Brian Gosschalk . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
37.
Patterson, Thomas E. 1980. The Mass Media Election. New York: Praeger .
38.
Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Out of the Order. New York: Knopf .
39.
Patterson, Thomas , and Wolfgang Donsbach . 1993. “Media and Democracy.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Washington, D.C.
40.
Patterson, Thomas , and Robert McClure . 1976. The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Elections. New York: Putnam .
41.
Perzworski, Adam , and Henry Teune . 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley .
42.
Pfetsch, Barbara , and Rudiger Schmitt-Beck . 1993. “Communication Strategies and the Mass Media in the 1990 German Election Campaign.” Presented at the April ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Leiden, The Netherlands.
43.
Public Radio and Television in the Federal Republic of Germany. 1985. Frankfurt: Hessischer Rundfunk .
44.
Robinson, Michael , and Margaret Sheehan . 1984. Over the Wire and on TV. New York: Praeger .
45.
Rosenstone, Steven J. , Donald R. Kinder , and Warren E. Miller . 1993. “Long-Term Support for the National Election Studies, 1994-1998.”University of Michigan proposal to the National Science Foundation .
46.
Schoenbach, Klaus . 1987. “The Role of Mass Media in West German Election Campaigns.”Legislative Studies Quarterly12 (2): 373-394 .
47.
Semetko, Holli A. 1991a. “Broadcasting and Election Communication in Britain.” In Media, Elections and Democracy. ed. Frederick J. Fletcher , Toronto: Royal Commission on Electoral Reform and Party Finance/Dundurn .
48.
Semetko, Holli A. , 1991b. “Images of Britain's Changing Party System: TV News and the 1983 and 1987 General Election Campaigns.”Political Communication and Persuasion8(4): 163-181 .
49.
Semetko, Holli A. 1993. “American Election News in a Comparative Perspective.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.
50.
Semetko, Holli A. 1994. “The News, Democracy and the Electoral Process in Germany: 1994 and 1990 German National Election Campaigns.” Proposal to the Goldsmiths Awards Committee, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University .
51.
Semetko, Holli A. N.d. Campaigning on Television: U.S. News and Elections in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press . Forthcoming.
52.
Semetko, Holli A., and Vincent E. Price, eds. 1995. “Election Year Communication: Involvement or Alienation?”Political Communication11(4): 323-329 .
53.
Semetko, Holli A. , and Marilyn Roberts . 1993. “Local and National Television News in the U.S.: 1992 Presidential Election Campaign.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Washington, D.C.
54.
Semetko, Holli A. , and Klaus Schoenbach . 1993. “The Campaign in the Media.” In The New Germany Votes: Unification and the Creation of the New German Party System, ed. Russell Dalton . Providence, RI, and Oxford: Berg .
55.
Semetko, Holli A. , and Klaus Schoenbach . 1993. Germany's “Unity” Election: Voters and the Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton .
56.
Semetko, Holli A. , Jay G. Blumler , Michael Gurevitch , and David H. Weaver . 1991. The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
57.
Semetko, Holli A. , T.J. Nossiter , and Margaret Scammell . 1994. “The Media's Coverage of the Campaign.” In Labour's Last Chance?, ed. Anthony Heath , Roger Jowell , and John Curtice . Aldershot, U.K.: Dartmouth .
58.
Seymour-Ure, Colin . 1974. The Political Impact of Mass Media. London: Constable .
59.
Shaw, Donald , and Maxwell E. McCombs . 1977. The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press. St. Paul, MN: West .
60.
Siebert, Fred S. , Theodore Peterson , and Wilber Schramm . 1956. Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility and Soviet Communist Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press .
61.
Smith, Anthony . 1979. Television and Political Life: Studies in Six European Countries. London: Macmillan .
62.
Stevens, Russell. 1992. “Talk Show Democracy: How the New Venue Changed the 1992 Campaign.” Master's thesis. Joan Shorenstein Center for the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
63.
Swanson, David L. 1992. “Managing Theoretical Diversity in Cross-national Studies of Political Communication.” In Comparatively Speaking: Communication and Culture across Space and Time, ed. Jay G. Blumler , Jack M. McLeod , and Karl Erik Rosengren . Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
64.
Swanson, David , and Paolo Mancini , eds., N.d., Politics, Media and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences. New York: Praeger . Forthcoming.
65.
Tuchman, Gaye . 1978. Making News. New York: Free Press .
66.
Weaver, David H. , Doris A. Graber , Maxwell E. McCombs , and C.E. Eyal . 1981. Media Agenda-setting in a Presidential Election: Issues, Images, and Interest. New York: Praeger .
