The risk of terrorism in the United States has gained a great deal of attention from researchers, policy makers, the public, and the press. This article focused on how one of these actors—the press—portrayed the risk during an eight-year period centered on the attacks of 9/11. The three goals of this study were to identify the dimensions of terrorism risk that are most likely to increase public perceptions of the danger, describe how these dimensions were portrayed in newspaper content, and explain how these portrayals were associated with other important news topics including the use of military force, the protection of civil liberties, and the image of the Muslim religion.
Baker, Thomas E., and John F. Stack.2006. At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield .
2.
Bennett, Lance W.1994. “The News about Foreign Policy.” In Taken by Storm:The Media, Public Opinion and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War, ed. Lance W. Bennett and David L. Paletz.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
Brown, Jonathan D., and Judith M. Siegel .1988. “Attributions for Negative Life Events and Depression: The Role of Perceived Control.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54:316-22.
4.
Bunton, Kristie.1998. “Social Responsibility in Covering Community: A Narrative Case Analysis.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics13(4):232-46.
5.
Chapin, Douglas M.2002. “Nuclear Power Plants and Their Fuel as Terrorist Targets.” Science297:1997-99.
6.
Cohen, Bernard C.1963. The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Cole, David, and James X. Dempsey .2002. Terrorism and the Constitution: Sacrificing Civil Liberties in the Name of National Security. New York: New Press.
8.
Covello, V.T.1992. “Risk Communication: An Emerging Area of Health Communication Research.” In Communication Yearbook, ed. S. Deetz. 15th Edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Daalder, Ivo H., James M. Lindsay, and James B. Steinberg .2002. “Hard Choices: National Security and the War on Terrorism.” Current History101(659):409-13.
10.
Entman, Robert M.2003. “Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House's Frame after 9/11.” Political Communication20(4):415-32.
11.
Fischhoff, B., R.M. Gonzalez, D.A. Small, and J.S. Lerner.2003. “Judged Terror Risk and Proximity to the World Trade Center.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty26(2):137-51.
12.
Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs.1978. “How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes towards Technological Risks and Benefits.” Policy Sciences9:127-52.
Gans, Herbert J.1979. Deciding What's News:A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.
15.
Gitlin, Todd.1980. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Graber, Doris A.2003. “Terrorism, Censorship and the First Amendment: In Search of Policy Guidelines.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. Pippa Norris, Montague Kern, and Marion Just. New York: Routledge.
17.
Gray, George M., and David P. Ropeik .2002. “Dealing with the Dangers of Fear: The Role of Risk Communication.” Health Affairs21(6):106-16.
18.
Hertog, James K.2000. “Elite Press Coverage of the 1986 U.S.—Libya Conflict: A Case Study of Tactical and Strategic Critique.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly77(3):612-27.
19.
Horvit, Beverly.2003. “Combat, Political Violence Top International Categories .” Newspaper Research Journal24(2):22-35.
20.
Huddy, Leonie, Stanley Feldman, Gallya Lahav, and Charles Taber.2003. “Fear and Terrorism: Psychological Reactions to 9/11.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. Pippa Norris, Montague Kern, and Marion Just.New York: Routledge.
21.
Kern, Montague, Marion Just, and Pippa Norris.2003. “The Lessons of Framing Terrorism .” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. Pippa Norris, Montague Kern, and Marion Just.New York: Routledge.
22.
Leone, Richard C., and Greg Anrig Jr., eds. 2003. The War on Our Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New York: BBS Public Affairs.
23.
Li, Xigen, and Ralph Izard.2003. “9/11 Attack Coverage Reveals Similarities, Differences.” Newspaper Research Journal24(1):204-19.
24.
Nacos, Brigitte L.1994. Terrorism and the Media: From the Iran Hostage Crisis to the World Trade Center Bombing. New York: Columbia University Press.
25.
Nacos, Brigitte L., and Oscar Torres-Reyna .2003. “Framing Muslim-Americans before and after 9/11.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government, and the Public, ed. Pippa Norris, Montague Kern, and Marion Just.New York: Routledge.
26.
Norris, Pippa, Montague Kern , and Marion Just, eds. 2003. Framing Terrorism:The News Media, the Government, and the Public. New York: Routledge .
27.
Office of Homeland Security.2002. The National Strategy for Homeland Security. July. Available at <www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/book>.
28.
Pape, Robert.2005. Dying to Win: The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism . New York: Random House.
29.
Pew Research Center.2004. Views of Islam Remain Sharply Divided. Plurality Sees Islam as More Likely to Encourage Violence. Sept. 9. Available at <www.people-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=96>.
30.
Project for Excellence in Journalism.2002 . Return to Normalcy? How the Media Have Covered the War on Terrorism. Jan. 28. Available at <www.journalism.org/resources/research/reports/normalcy/default.asp>.
31.
Sjöberg, Lennart.2005. “The Perceived Risk of Terrorism.” Risk Management: AnInternational Journal7:43-61.
32.
Slovic, Paul.2002. “Terrorism as Hazard: A New Species of Trouble.” Risk Analysis22(3):425-26.
33.
Slovic, Paul.2004. The Perception of Risk. Sterling, VA , and London: Earthscan.
34.
Sunstein, Cass.2003. “Terrorism and Probability Neglect.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty26(2/3):121-36.
35.
Sunstein, Cass.2004. “Fear and Liberty.” Social Research71(4):976-96.
36.
Swain, Kristen A.2003. “Proximity and Power Factors in Western Coverage of the Sub-Saharan AIDS Crisis.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly80(1):145-65.
37.
Ten Eyck, Toby A., and Melissa Williment.2003. “The National Media and Things Genetic.” Science Communication25(2):129-52.
38.
Traugott, Michael W., and Ted Brader.2003. “Explaining 9/11.” In Framing Terrorism:The News Media, the Government, and the Public , ed. Pippa Norris, Montague Kern, and Marion Just.New York: Routledge.
39.
Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman.1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases .” Science185:1124-31.
40.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration.2003. Risk Assessment for Food Terrorism and Other Food Safety Concerns. Oct. 13. Available at <www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/rabtact.html >.
41.
White House.2002. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Sept. Available at <www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf>.
42.
Witte, Kim, and Mike Allen.2000. “A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns.” Health Education & Behavior27(5):591-615.
43.
Zimbardo, Philip, and Bruce Kluger.2003. “Phantom Menace: Is Washington Terrorizing Us More Than Al Qaeda?” Psychology Today36(3):34-36.
