Content-coded network newscasts are used to examine the relationship between news coverage and the daily New Hampshire poll standings of the four major Democratic presidential candidates in the weeks before the 2004 primary. The study finds powerful network news effects, particularly with respect to horse-race reports on which candidate was gaining or losing ground, for John Kerry, Howard Dean, Wesley Clark, and John Edwards. The influence of network news coverage on New Hampshire tracking poll standings casts doubt on claims by those who support New Hampshire’s status as the first primary because the state is thought to differ from the media-dominated electoral contests found elsewhere in American politics.
Adams, William C.1987. “As New Hampshire goes...” In Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, ed. Gary R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
2.
Baker, Ross K.1993. “Sorting Out and Suiting Up: The Presidential Nominations.” In The Election of 1992: Reports and Interpretations, ed. Gerald M. Pomper. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
3.
Bartels, Larry M.1985. “Expectations and Preferences in Presidential Nominating Campaigns.”American Political Science Review79:804-815.
4.
Bartels, Larry M.1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
Brady, Henry E., and Richard Johnston. 1987. “What’s the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism?” In Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, ed. Gary R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
6.
Buhr, Tami. 2001. “What Voters Know about Candidates and How They Learn It: The 1996 New Hampshire Republican Primary as a Case Study.” In In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees, ed. William G. Mayer. New York: Chatham House/Seven Bridges.
7.
Ceaser, James, and Andrew Busch. 1993. Upside Down and Inside Out: The 1992 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
Ceaser, James, and Andrew Busch. 2005. Red over Blue: The 2004 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
Davis, Richard, and Diana Owen. 1998. New Media and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
Duncan, Dayton. 1991. Grass Roots: One Year in the Life of the New Hampshire Presidential Primary. New York: Viking.
11.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and S. Robert Lichter. 1999. “No Small Town Poll: Network Coverage of the 1992 New Hampshire Primary.”Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics4:51-61.
12.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and S. Robert Lichter. 2002. “The 1996 New Hampshire Republican Primary and Network News.”Politics & Policy30(March):70-88.
13.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and S. Robert Lichter. 2003a. “The Manchester Union Leader’s Influence in the 1996 New Hampshire Republican Primary.”Presidential Studies Quarterly33(2):291-304.
14.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and S. Robert Lichter. 2003b. The Nightly News Nightmare: Network Television’s Coverage of U.S. Presidential Elections, 1988-2000. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
15.
Farnsworth, Stephen J., and S. Robert Lichter. 2003c. “The 2000 New Hampshire Democratic Primary and Network News.”American Behavioral Scientist46(5):588-599.
16.
Graber, Doris. 1988. Processing the News. New York: Longman.
17.
Hofstetter, C. Richard, and David W. Moore. 1982. “Television News Coverage of Presidential Primaries.”Journalism Quarterly59(winter):651-654.
18.
Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Kerbel, Matthew R.1997. “The Media: Viewing the Campaign through a Strategic Haze.” In The Elections of 1996, ed. Michael Nelson. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
20.
Mayer, William G.1987. “The New Hampshire Primary: A Historical Overview.” In Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics, ed. Gary R. Orren and Nelson W. Polsby. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
21.
Mayer, William G.2001. “The Presidential Nominations.” In The Elections of 2000: Reports and Interpretations, ed. Gerald M. Pomper. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
22.
Moore, David. 1984. “The Death of Politics in New Hampshire.”Public Opinion7(February-March):56-57.
23.
Orren, Gary R., and Nelson W. Polsby, eds. 1987. Media and Momentum: The New Hampshire Primary and Nomination Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
24.
Owen, Diana. 1997. “The Press’ Performance.” In Toward the Millennium: The Elections of 1996, ed. Larry J. Sabato. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
Palmer, Niall A.1997. The New Hampshire Primary and the American Electoral Process. Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
Patterson, Thomas E.1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.
27.
Patterson, Thomas E.1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.
28.
Robinson, Michael J., and Margaret A. Sheehan. 1983. Over the Wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in Campaign ’80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
Rosenstiel, Tom. 1994. Strange Bedfellows: How Television and the Presidential Candidates Changed American Politics, 1992. New York: Hyperion.
30.
Rueter, Theodore. 1988. “Reflections on the New Hampshire Primary.”PS21(spring):273-277.
31.
Sprague, Stuart. 1984. “The New Hampshire Primary.”Presidential Studies Quarterly14(winter):127-131.
32.
Stanley, Harold W.1997. “The Nominations: Republican Doldrums, Democratic Revival.” In The Elections of 1996, ed. Michael Nelson. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
33.
Stanley, Harold W.2001. “The Nominations: The Return of the Party Leaders.” In The Elections of 2000, ed. Michael Nelson. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
