Rather than studying the effects of a programmed debate per se, this article examines the “total information environment” that surrounds the debate. A model explaining how people make judgments about the “winner” of a debate is suggested and tested on survey data (N = 748) collected in the days following the second 1996 presidential debate. Results demonstrate that consumption of debate-related news coverage, interpersonal discussion about the debate, and prior candidate attitudes are associated with perceptions of the winner of the debate. In addition, exposure to news coverage of the debate significantly interacted with exposure to the actual debate, so that the impact of news coverage was stronger for those watching little of the actual debate.
Atkin, Charles, John Hocking, and Steven McDermott. 1978. “Home State Voter Response and Secondary Media Coverage.” In The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976, ed. Sidney Kraus, 429-436. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3.
Beck, Paul A. 1991. “Voter Intermediation Environments in the 1988 Presidential Contest.” Public Opinion Quarterly537:371-394.
4.
Blais, Andre, and Martin M. Boyer. 1996. “Assessing the Impact of Televised Debates: The Case of the 1988 Canadian Election.” British Journal of Political Science26(2):143-164.
5.
Dayan, Daniel, and Elihu Katz. 1995. “Political Ceremony and Instant History.” In Television: An International History, ed. Anthony Smith, 169-188. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
DeFleur, Melvin L., and Sandra Ball-Rokeach. 1989. Theories of Mass Communication. 5th ed. New York: Longman.
7.
Graber, Doris A. 1984. Processing the News: How People Tame the Information Tide. New York: Longman.
8.
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1999. “Political Learning from Presidential Debates.” Political Behavior21(1):67-89.
9.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1991. “Discussant Effects on Vote Choice: Intimacy, Structure, and Interdependence.” Journal of Politics53(1):122-158.
10.
Jamieson, Kathleen H. 1987. “Television, Presidential Campaigns and Debates.” In Presidential Debates—1988 and Beyond, ed. Joel L. Swerdlow. Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly.
11.
Jamieson, Kathleen H., and David S. Birdsell. 1988. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Katz, Elihu, and Daniel Dayan. 1992. Media Events: The Live Broadcasting of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
Katz, Elihu, and Jacob J. Feldman. 1962. “The Debates in the Light of Research: A Survey of Surveys.” In The Great Debates, ed. Sidney Kraus, 173-222. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
14.
Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1957. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communication. New York: Free Press.
15.
Klapper, Joseph T. 1960. The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
16.
Kraus, Sidney. 2000. Televised Presidential Debates and Public Policy. 2d ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Lang, Gladys E., and Kurt Lang. 1978. “Immediate and Delayed Responses to the Carter-Ford Debate: Assessing Public Opinion.” Public Opinion Quarterly42:322-341.
18.
Lemert, James B. 1996. “News Verdicts and Their Effects.” In The Politics of Disenchantment: Bush, Clinton, Perot and the Press, ed. James B. Lemert, William R. Elliot, William L. Rosenberg, and James M. Bernstein, 175-198. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
19.
Lemert, James B., William R. Elliot, James M. Bernstein, William L. Rosenberg, and Karl J. Nestvold. 1991. News Verdicts, the Debates, and Presidential Campaigns. New York: Praeger.
20.
Lenart, Silvo. 1994. Shaping Political Attitudes: The Impact of Interpersonal Communication and Mass Media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Lowry, Dennis T., Janet A. Bridges, and Paul A. Barefield. 1990. “Effects of TV Instant Analysis and Querulous Criticism—Following the 1st Bush-Dukakis Debate.” Journalism Quarterly67(4):814-825.
22.
Mondak, Jeffry J. 1995. Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
23.
Morello, John T. 1990. “`Who Won?' A Critical Examination of Newspaper Editorials Evaluating Nationally Televised Presidential Debates.” Argumentation & Advocacy27(3):114-125.
24.
Mutz, Diana C. 1998. Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Patterson, Thoman. E. 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.
26.
Pfau, Michael. 1987. “The Influence of Inter-Party Political Debates on Candidate Preference.” Communication Research14(6):687-697.
27.
Pfau, Michael, Tracy Diedrich, Karla M. Larson, and Kim M. Van Winkle. 1995. “Influence of Communication Modalities on Voters' Perceptions of Candidates during Presidential Primary Campaigns.” Journal of Communication45(1):122-133.
28.
Pfau, Michael, and Jong G. Kang. 1991. “The Impact of Relational Message on Candidate Influence in Televised Political Debates.” Communication Studies42(2):114-128.
29.
Schrott, Peter R. 1990. “Electoral Consequences of `Winning' Televised Campaign Debates.” Public Opinion Quarterly54:567-585.
30.
Sears, David O., and Steve Chaffee. 1979. “Uses and Effects of the 1976 Debates: An Overview of Empirical Studies.” In The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976, ed. Sidney Kraus, 223-261. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31.
Sears, David O., and Jonathan L. Freedman. 1967. “Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review.” Public Opinion Quarterly31(2):194-213.
32.
Sigelman, Lee, and Carol K. Sigelman. 1984. “Judgments of the Carter-Reagan Debate: The Eye of the Beholder.” Public Opinion Quarterly48:624-628.
33.
Steeper, Frederick T. 1978. “Public Response to Gerald Ford's Statement on Eastern Europe in the Second Debate.” In The Presidential Debates: Media, Electoral and Policy Perspectives, eds. George F. Bishop, Robert G. Meadow, and Marilyn Jackson-Beeck, 84-87. New York: Praeger.
34.
Swanson, Linda L., and David L. Swanson. 1978. “An Agenda Setting Function of the First Carter-Ford Debate.” Communication Monographs45:340-361.
35.
Yanovitzky, Yitzhak, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2001. “Effect of Call-In Political Talk Radio Shows on Their Audience: Evidence from a Multi Wave Panel Survey.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research13(4):377-397.
