The decline of the image of the political elite in Germany since the 1960s is related to the press coverage of German politicians. It has been argued that (1) the image of the political elite has declined because (2) the press coverage has become increasingly negative, and (3) politicians are the main source of negative statements about other politicians because (4) they get the most publicity if they attack other politicians. Press coverage, however, is not regarded as the only cause of the behavior of politicians and the opinions of the population, but rather as an indicator of general trends in the media coverage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Craig, Stephen C. 1993. The Malevolent Leader: Popular Discontent in America. Boulder, CO: Westview.
2.
Dean, Dwight G.1961. “Alienation: Its Meaning and Measurement.”American Sociological Review26:753-758.
3.
Ehmig, Simone C.1991. “Parteilichkeit oder Politikverdrossenheit? Die Darstellung von Motiven und Emotionen deutscher Politiker im `Spiegel' ” (Partiality or political alienation? The presentation of motives and emotions of German politicians in `Der Spiegel'). Publizistik36(2):183-200.
4.
Ehmig, Simone C. 2000. Generationswechsel im deutschen Journalismus. Zum Einfluss historischer Ereignisse auf das journalistische Selbstverständnis (Generational change in German journalism: The influence of historical events on the role conceptions of journalists). Freiburg, Germany: Alber.
5.
Hufnagel, Ariane , and Katja Kluge. 1997. “Journalistische Stilformen und Informations-quellen” (Journalistic genres and information sources). In Wochenmedien Jahrbuch 1996, ed. Michael Haller and Markus Rettich. Bern, Bonn: Inno Vatio.
6.
Kalt, Gero , ed. 1993. Schlecht informiert. Wie Medien dieWirklichkeit verzerren. Eine Fallsammlung. (Poorly informed: How media coverage biases reality—A case collection). 2nd Edition. Frankfurt/Main: Institut für Medienentwicklung und Kommunikation.
7.
Kepplinger, Hans M. 1998. Die Demontage der Politik in der Informationsgesellschaft. (The dismantling of politics in the information society). Freiburg, Germany: Alber.
8.
Kleinhenz, Thomas . 1995. Die Nichtwähler. Ursachen der sinkenden Wahlbeteiligung (Nonvoters: Causes of declining turnout). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
9.
Lerner, Daniel . 1958. The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernization in the Middle East. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
10.
Lipset, Seymour M. , and William Schneider. 1983. The Confidence Gap: Business, Labour, and Government in the Public Mind. New York: Free Press.
11.
Listhaug, Ola , and Arthur H. Miller. 1990. “Political Parties and Confidence in Government: A Comparison of Norway, Sweden, and the United States.”British Journal of Political Science20:357-386.
12.
Maurer, Marcus. 1997. “Politikverdrossenheit—Modell für eine Kausalanalyse” (Political alienation—A model for causal analysis). Master's thesis, Institut fuer Publizistik, Mainz.
13.
Moy, Patricia , Michael Pfau, and Lee A. Kahlor. 1999. “Media Use and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions.”Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media43: 137-158.
14.
Olson, Marvin E.1968/69. “Two Categories of Political Alienation.”Social Forces47:288-299.
15.
Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf.
16.
Robinson, Michael J.1976. “Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of `The Selling of the Pentagon.' ”American Political Science Review70:409-432.
17.
Schudson, Michael . 1999. “Social Origins of Press Cynicism in Portraying Politics.”American Behavioral Scientist42:998-1008.
18.
Seeman, Melvin . 1959. “On the Meaning of Alienation.”American Sociological Review49:783-791.
19.
Srole, Leo . 1956. “Social Integration and Certain Corollaries: An Exploratory Study.”American Sociological Review21:709-716.
20.
Struening, Elmer L. , and Arthur H. Richardson. 1965. “A Factor Analytic Exploration of the Alienation, Anomia, and Authoritarianism Domain.”American Sociological Review30:768-776.
