Speaking for the Public

Abstract

Audience-participation programs are designed to provide interaction between politicians and voters. Through voters' questions, politicians gain a valuable gauge of public opinion. However, for this to happen, participants must be representative of the general public. Previous U.S. research suggests that this is not the case, but this failure may be caused by that country's commercialized media structure. Callers to the premiere British election phone-in program, Election Call, broadcast by the non-commercial BBC, are compared with members of the general public to determine whether its participants are socially and politically representative of the general public. The results are negative, at least in part because simply reflecting the public mood would conflict with the rules and norms of public-interest broadcasting.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barker, David C. 1998. “Rush to Action: Political Talk Radio and Health Care (Un)Reform.” Political Communication 15(Jan.-Mar.): 83-97 .

Bierg, Jeffrey , and John Dimmick . 1979. “The Late Night Radio Talk Show as Interpersonal Communication.” Journalism Quarterly 56(spring): 92-96 .

Curtice, John , and Roger Jowell . 1997. “The Sceptical Electorate.” In British Social Attitudes: The Fourteenth Report, ed. Roger Jowell , John Curtice , Alison Park , Lindsay Brook , Katarina Thomson , and Caroline Bryson . Aldershot: Ashgate .

Davis, Richard , and Diana Owen . 1998. New Media and American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press .

Harrison, Martin . 1997. “Politics in the Air.” In The British General Election of 1997, ed. David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh . Basingstoke: Macmillan .

Herbst, Susan . 1995. “On Electronic Public Space: Talk Shows in Theoretical Perspective.” Political Communication 12(July-Sept.): 263-274 .

Hofstetter, C. Richard , Mark C. Donovan , Melville R. Klauber , Alexandra Cole , Carolyn J. Huie , Toshiyuki Yuasa . 1994. “Political Talk Radio: A Stereotype Reconsidered.” Political Research Quarterly 47(June): 467-480 .

Hutchby, Ian . 1995. “Aspects of Recipient Design in Expert Advice-Giving on Call-in Radio.” Discourse Processes 19(2): 219-238 .

Hutchby, Ian . 1996. “Power in Discourse: The Case of Arguments on a British Talk Radio Show.” Discourse and Society 7(Oct.): 481-498 .

10.

Kurtz, Howard . 1996. Hot Air: All Talk, All the Time. New York: Times Books .

11.

Levin, Murray . 1987. Talk Radio and the American Dream. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath .

12.

Livingstone, Sonia . 1994. Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate. London: Routledge .

13.

Newhagen, John E. 1994. “Self-Efficacy and Call-in Political Television Show Use.” Communication Research 21(June): 366-379 .

14.

Office of Population Censuses and Surveys . 1990. Classification of Occupations 1990. London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys .

15.

Page, Benjamin I. 1996. Who Deliberates? Mass Media in American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .

16.

Parry, Geraint , George Moyser , and Neil Day . 1992. Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .

17.

Semetko, Holli , Jay Blumler , Michael Gurevitch , and David Weaver . 1991. The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .

18.

Turow, Joseph . 1974. “Talk Radio as Interpersonal Communication.” Journal of Broadcasting 18(1): 171-179 .

19.

Verba, Sidney , Kay Lehman Schlozman , and Henry E. Brady . 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

20.

Wolinetz, Janet S. 1996. “Talk Radio and the Gossip Narrative.” Presented at the International Society of Political Psychology, Vancouver, B.C., July.