This study examined the influence of various communication forms or modalities on prospective voters' perceptions of candidates and their attitudes about the democratic process during the 2000 presidential election campaign. A total of 450 prospective voters were surveyed during the final three weeks of the 2000 campaign about communication use, perceptions of the two major party candidates, and attitudes about the democratic process. After controlling for respondents' age, gender, education, strength of party identification, and the number of candidate ads recalled, the results indicated that use of nontraditional communication forms (such as political talk radio and, to a somewhat lesser extent, television entertainment talk shows, television talk shows, and television news magazines) exerted the most influence on perceptions of presidential candidates. Among traditional communication forms, people's use of televised debates exerted considerable influence, but newspapers, magazines, and television news exerted very limited impact. In contrast to this pattern of findings regarding communication use and candidate perceptions, people's use of more traditional communication forms, especially televised debates and newspapers, was associated with positive attitudes about the democratic process, whereas nontraditional media exerted no significant influence on process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, Alan I.1978. “The Impact of a Presidential Debate on Voter Rationality.”American Journal of Political Science22:680-690.
2.
Ansolabehere, Stephen , and Shanto Iyengar. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink & Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
3.
Asher, Herbert B. 1983. Causal Modeling. 2nd Edition. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Asher, Herbert B. 1984. “Regression Analysis.” In Theory-Building and Data Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Herbert B. Asher, Herbert F. Weisberg, John H. Kessel, and W. Phillips Shively. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
5.
Atkin, Charles K. 1973. “Instrumental Utilities and Information-Seeking.” In New Models for Mass Communication Research, ed. Peter Clarke. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
Atkin, Charles K. 1980. “Political Campaigns: Mass Communication and Persuasion.” In Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research, ed. Michael E. Roloff and Gerald R. Miller. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
Becker, Lee I. , Idowu A. Sobowale, and William E. Casey. 1979. “Newspaper and Television Dependencies: Effects on Evaluations of Public Officials.”Journal of Broadcasting23:465-475.
8.
Becker, Lee , and D. Charles Whitney. 1980. “Effects of Media Dependencies.”Communication Research7:95-120.
9.
Becker, Samuel L. , Robert Pepper, Lawrence A. Wenner, and Jim Keon Kim. 1979. “Information Flow and the Shaping of Meanings.” In The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976, ed. Sydney S. Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
Burgoon, Michael , Marshall Cohen, Michael D. Miller, and Charles L. Montgomery. 1978. “An Empirical Test of Resistance to Persuasion.”Human Communication Research5:27-39.
11.
Cappella, Joseph N. , Joseph Turrow, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1996. Call-in Political Talk Radio: Background, Content, Audiences, Portrayal in Mainstream Media. No. 5. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg Public Policy Center.
12.
Chaffee, Steven H.1978. “Presidential Debates—Are They Helpful to Voters?”Communication Monographs45:330-346.
13.
Chaffee, Steven H. , and Sun Yuel Choe. 1980. “Time of Decision and Media Use during the Ford-Carter Campaign.”Public Opinion Quarterly44:53-69.
14.
Chaffee, Steven H. , and Joan Schleuder. 1986. “Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News.”Human Communication Research13:76-107.
15.
Chesebro, James W. , and Dale A. Bertelsen. 1996. Analyzing Media: Communication Technologies as Symbolic and Cognitive Systems. New York: Guilford.
16.
Clarke, Peter , and Eric Fredin. 1978. “Newspapers, Television and Political Reasoning.”Public Opinion Quarterly42:143-160.
17.
Craig, Stephen C. 1996. “The Angry Voter: Politics and Popular Discontent in the 1990s.” In Broken Contract? Changing Relationships between Americans and Their Government, ed. Stephen C. Craig. Boulder, CO: Westview.
18.
Davis, Dennis K. 1979. “Influence on Vote Decisions.” In The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976, ed. Sydney S. Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
19.
Davis, Mark H.1982. “Voting Intentions in the 1980 Carter-Reagan Debate.”Journal of Applied Social Psychology12:481-492.
20.
Davis, Richard , and Diana Owen. 1998. New Media and American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Delli Carpini , Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22.
Drew, Dan , and David Weaver. 1990. “Media Attention, Media Exposure, and Media Effects.”Journalism Quarterly67:740-748.
23.
Dulio, David A. , Candice J. Nelson, and James A. Thurber. 2000. “Introduction.” In Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections, ed. James A. Thurber, Candice J. Nelson, and David A. Dulio. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
24.
Erber, Ralph , and Richard R. Lau. 1990. “Political Cynicism Revisited: An Information-Processing Reconciliation of Policy-Based and Incumbency-Based Interpretations of Changes in Trust in Government.”American Journal of Political Science34:236-253.
25.
Fan, David P. , and Albert R. Tims. 1989. “The Impact of the News Media on Public Opinion: American Presidential Election 1987-1988.”International Journal of Public Opinion Research1:151-163.
26.
Garramone, Gina M.1983. “Issue versus Image Orientation and Effects of Political Advertising.”Communication Research10:59-76.
27.
Garramone, Gina M.1984. “Voter Responses to Negative Political Ads.”Journalism Quarterly61:250-259.
28.
Gunter, Barry . 1987. Poor Reception: Misunderstandings and Forgetting Broadcast News. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Hofstetter, C. Richard , Cliff Zukin, and Terry F. Bus. 1978. “Political Imagery and Information in an Age of Television.”Journalism Quarterly55:562-569.
30.
Hollander, Barry A.1996. “Talk Radio: Predictors of Use and Effects on Attitudes about Government.”Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly73(1):102-113.
31.
Inglehart, Ronald , and Pippa Norris. 2000. “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women's and Men's Voting Behavior in Global Perspective.”International Political Science Review21:441-463.
32.
Iyengar, Shanto , and David R. Kinder. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Iyengar, Shanto , and John R. Petrocik. 2000. “ `Basic Rule' Voting: Impact of Campaigns on Party- and Approval-Based Voting.” In Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections, ed. James A. Thurber, Candice J. Nelson, and David A. Dulio. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
34.
Jeffries, Leo W. 1986. Mass Media: Processes and Effects. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
35.
Just, Marion R. , Ann N. Crigler, Dean E. Alger, Timothy E. Cook, Montague Kern, and Darrell M. West. 1996. Crosstalk: Citizens, Candidates, and the Media in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Kaid, Lynda Lee , and Keith Sanders. 1978. “Political Television Commercials: An Experimental Study of Type and Length.”Communication Research5:57-70.
37.
Kaufmann, Karen M. , and John R. Petrocik. 1999. “The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap.”American Journal of Political Science43:864-887.
38.
Kelley, Stanley, Jr. 1983. Interpreting Elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Kern, Montague , Marian Just, and Ann Crigler. 1997. “Citizen Use of World Wide Web Sites in the 1996 Presidential Election.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, November.
40.
Kraus, Sydney . 1988. Televised Presidential Debates and Public Policy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Luntz, Frank , and Ron Dermer. 1994. “A Farewell to the American Dream?”The Public Perspective (Sept./Oct.): 12-14.
42.
McCroskey, James C. , William Holdridge, and J. Kevin Toomb. 1974. “An Instrument for Measuring the Source Credibility of Basic Communication Instructors.”Speech Teacher23:26-33.
43.
McCroskey, James C. , and Thomas A. Jenson. 1975. “Image of Mass Media News Sources.”Journal of Broadcasting19:169-180.
44.
McGuire, William . 1986. “The Myth of Massive Media Impact: Savagings and Salvagings.”Public Communication and Behavior1:173-257.
45.
McLeod, Jack M. , Katie Daily, William P. Eveland, Zhongshi Guo, Katy Culver, David Kurpius, Patricia Moy, Edward Horowitz, and Mengbai Zhong. 1995. “The Synthetic Crisis: Media Influences on Perceptions of Crime.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, D.C., August.
46.
McLeod, Jack M. , and Daniel G. McDonald. 1985. “Beyond Simple Exposure: Media Orientations and Their Impact on Political Processes.”Communication Research12:3-33.
47.
Miller, Arthur H. , and Michael MacKuen. 1979. “Informing the Electorate: A National Study. In The Great Debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976, ed. Sydney Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
48.
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1996. Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
49.
Moy, Patricia , and Michael Pfau. 2000. With Malice toward All? The Media and Public Confidence in Democratic Institutions. New York: Praeger.
50.
“1995 Year in Review.”1996. Media Monitor (January/February). Available:www.cmpa.com/html/janfeb96.html#laughter
51.
Norris, Pippa . 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Norris, Pippa , John Curtice, David Sanders, Margaret Scammell, and Holli A. Semetko. 1999. On Message: Communicating the Campaign. London: Sage.
53.
Orren, Gary . 1997. “Fall from Grace: The Public's Loss of Faith in Government.” In Why People Don't Trust Government, ed. Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Philip D. Zelikow, and David C. King. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
Owen, Diana . 1991. Media Messages in American Presidential Elections. New York: Greenwood.
55.
Patterson, Thomas E. 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.
56.
Patterson, Thomas E. , and Robert D. McClure. 1974. Political Advertising: Voter Reaction to Televised Political Commercials. Princeton, NJ: Citizens Research Foundation.
57.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press . 1998. Deconstructing Distrust: How Americans View Government. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.
58.
Pfau, Michael , Tracy Diedrich, Karla M. Larson, and Kim M. Van Winkle. 1993. “Relational and Competence Perceptions of Presidential Candidates during Primary Election Campaigns.”Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media37:275-292.
59.
Pfau, Michael , and William P. Eveland, Jr. 1994. “Debates versus Other Communication Sources: The Pattern of Information and Influence.” In The 1992 Presidential Debates in Focus, ed. Diana B. Carlin and Mitchell S. McKinney. New York: Praeger.
60.
Pfau, Michael , Kathleen E. Kendall, Thomas Reichert, Susan A. Hellweg, Waipeng Lee, Kyle James Tusing, and Theodore Proise. 1997. “Influence of Communication during the Distant Phase of the 1996 Republican Presidential Primary Campaign.”Journal of Communication47:6-26.
61.
Price, Vincent , and John Zaller. 1993. “Who Got the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research.”Public Opinion Quarterly57:133-164.
62.
Ranney, Austin . 1983. Channels of Power: The Impact of Television on American Politics. New York: Basic Books.
63.
Roberts, Churchill L.1979. “Media Use and Difficulty of Decision in the 1976 Presidential Campaign.”Journalism Quarterly56:794-802.
64.
Rubin, Rebecca B. , and Howard E. Sypher, eds. 1994. Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook. New York: Guilford.
65.
Strope, Leigh . 2000. “Pols' Images Are Live From New York.”Wisconsin State Journal (Oct. 22):A-4.
66.
West, Darrell M. 2000. “How Issue Ads Have Reshaped American Politics.” In Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections, ed. James A. Thurber, Candice J. Nelson, and David A. Dulio. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
67.
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
