The affective responses of readers to job-refusal letters using direct and
indirect approaches were investigated. Subjects were requested to rate
organizational plan on 19 dependent measures. Results indicated that the
direct job-refusal letter was preferred. It was viewed as more efficient, valuable
and straightforward than the indirect approach. These findings are in
conflict with current literature favoring the indirect approach for conveying
negative information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bovée, C., & Thill, J.V. (1995). Business communication today (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
2.
Brent, D. (1985). Indirect structure and reader response. The Journal of Business Communication, 22, 5-8.
3.
Brown, T. (1993). Unkind cuts: Rethinking the rhetoric of academic job rejection letters. College English, 55, 770-778.
4.
David, C., & Baker, M.A. (1994). Rereading bad news: Compliance-gaining features in management memos. The Journal of Business Communication , 31, 267-289.
5.
Guffey, M.E. (1995). Essentials of business communication (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
6.
Krajewski, L. (1979). Effectiveness of the inductive and the deductive organizational plans in a special request letter. (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1979).
7.
Jablin, F.M., & Krone, K. (1984). Characteristics of rejection letters and their effects on job applicants. Written Communication, 1, 387-406.
8.
Limaye, M. (1988). Buffers in bad news messages and recipient perceptions . Management Communication Quarterly, 2, 90-101.
9.
Salerno, D. (1988). An interpersonal approach to writing negative messages. The Journal of Business Communication, 25, 41-51.
10.
Sigband, N.B., & Bell, A.H. (1994). Communication for managers (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western .
11.
Wilkinson, C.W., Clarke, P.B., & Wilkinson, D.W. (1980). Communicating through letters and reports (7th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.
