Understanding student perceptions of group work should
help educators prepare students to be effective group members in the classroom and at work. This study ascer
tained student perceptions of their learning and achievement in group situations. The following correlations were
determined: (a) There was a relationship between student
grades and perceptions of the writing quality as well as
perceptions of the amount learned about group processes;
(b) there was no correlation between grades and student
opinions of the quantity of work achieved, the type of person
who hindered the group the most, and whether the student
enjoyed the group work.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barbour, D.H. (1990). Collaborative writing in the business writing classroomBulletin of the Association for Business Communication , 53(3), 33-35.
2.
Bell, A. (1992). Business communication in the news: A resource supplement for professors of business communicationCincinnati, OH: South-Western.
3.
Burnett, R.E. (1990). Benefits of collaborative planning in the business communication classroomBulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 9-17.
4.
Dorazio, P. (1985). Impressions of the technical writer: A master of many communication rolesBulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 48(2), 16-20.
5.
Duin, A.H. (1990). Terms and tools: A theory and research-based approach to collaborative writing. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 45-50.
6.
Easton, A., Easton, G., Flatley, M., & Penrose, J. (1990). Supporting group writing with computer softwareBulletin of the Association for Business Communication , 53(2), 34-37.
7.
Elwart-Keys, M., & Horton, M. (1990). Collaborating in the capture lab: Computer support for group writingBulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 38-44.
8.
Ewald, H.R., & MacCallum, V. (1990). Promoting creative tension within collaborative writing groupsBulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 23-26.
9.
Faigley, L., & Miller, T. (1982). What we learn from writing on the jobCollege English, 44557-569.
10.
Forman, J., & Katsky, P. (1986). The group report: A problem in small group or writing or writing processes?Journal of Business Communication , 23, 23-35.
11.
Lunsford, A., & Ede, L. (1986). Why write ... together: A research updateRhetoric Review, 5(1), 71-81.
12.
Meyers, G.D. (1991). Thinking styles and the writing groupBulletin of the Association for Business Communication , 54(1), 17-20.
13.
Morgan, M., Allen, N., Moore, T., Atkinson, D., & Snow, C. (1987). Collaborative writing in the classroomBulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 50(3), 20-26.
14.
Nelson, S.J., & Smith, D.C. (1990). Maximizing cohesion and minimizing conflict in collaborative writing groupsBulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 59-62.
15.
Porter, J.E. (1990). Ideology and collaboration in the classroom and in the corporationBulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 53(2), 18-22.
16.
Rieber, L.J. (1992). The role of cooperative writing in the business communication classroomBulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 55(2), 32-34.
17.
Shaw, M.E. (1981). Group dynamics: Psychology of small group behaviorNew York: McGraw-Hill. □
