Carey, L., Flower, L., Hayes, J.R., Schriver, K., & Haas, C. (1989). Differences in writers' initial task representations (Technical Report No. 35)Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing, University of California Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon.
2.
Clifford, J. (1981). Composing in stages: The effects of a collaborative pedagogyResearch in the Teaching of English, 15, 37-53.
3.
DiPardo, A., & Freedman, S.W. (1987, May). Historical overview: Groups in the writing classroom (Technical Report No. 4)Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing, University of California Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon.
4.
Flower, L. (1989, Fall). Writers planning: Four snapshots from researchPlanning to write: Notes on collaborative planning , pp. 1, 4-5. (Newsletter of The Making Thinking Visible Project, Center for the Study of Writing, Carnegie Mellon.)
5.
Flower, L., Burnett, R., Hajduk, T., Wallace, D., Norris, L., Peck, W., & Spivey, N. (1989). Classroom inquiry in collaborative planning . Pitsburgh, PA: Center for the Study of Writing, University of California Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon.
6.
Flower, L., Schriver, K., Carey, L., Haas, C., & Hayes, J.R. (1989). Planning in writing: The cognition of a constructive process (Technical Report No. 34)Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Writing, University of California Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon.
7.
Gargaro, J.Z. (1989, November). Using collaborative planning in the high school English classroomPaper presented at the meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, Baltimore, MD.
8.
Gebhardt, R. (1980). Teamwork and feedback: Broadening the base of collaborative writingCollege English, 42, 69-74.
9.
Gere, A.R., & Stevens, R.S. (1985). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language (pp. 85-105). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10.
Gere, A.R. (1987). Writing groups: History, theory, and implicationsCarbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
11.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and learningReview of Educational Research, 49, 51-70.
O'Donnell, A.M., Dansereau, D.F., Rocklin, T.R., Larson, C.O., Hythecker, V.I., Young, M.D., & Lambiotte, J.G. (1987). Effects of cooperative and individual rewriting on an instruction writing taskWritten Communication, 4 , 90-99.
14.
Norris, L. (1989a, February). How does collaborative planning compare with peer response?Planning to write: Notes on collaborative planning, p. 6. (Newsletter of The Making Thinking Visible Project, Center for the Study of Writing, Carnegie Mellon.)
15.
Norris, L. (1989b, November). The Making Thinking Visible Project: Observations and reflections on collaborative planningPaper presented at the meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English , Baltimore, MD.
16.
Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instructionEducational Psychologist, 21, 73-98.
17.
Putnam, L.L. (1986). Conflict in group decision-making In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 175-196). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, volume 2: Reading, writing, and language learning (pp. 142-175). Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
19.
Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relationsReview of Educational Research, 50, 241-171.