Confidentiality and the Letter of Recommendation: A New Approach

Baxter, J.C. , Brock, B. , Hill, P.C. , & Rozelle, R.M. (1981). Letters of recommendation: A question of value . Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 296-301.

Bell, J.D. , Castagnera, J. , & Young, J.P. (1984). Employment references. Personnel Journal, 63, 32-36.

Brown, K.A. (1984). Explaining group poor performance: An attributional analysis. Academy of Management Review, 9, 54-63.

Ceci, S.J. & Peters, D. (1984). Letters of reference: A naturalistic study of the effects of confidentiality. American Psychologist, 39, 29-31.

Curtis, C.T. (1974). Family educational rights and privacy act of 1974 . Congressional Record-Senate, 120, 19607-19614.

Family Education Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. 1232g.

Harvey, J.H. & Weary, G. (1981). Perspectives on attributional processes. Dubuque, IA: Brown.

Jones, E.E. & Nisbett, R.E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Kelley, H.H. & Michela, J.L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-503.

Knouse, S.B. (1983). The letter of recommendation: Specificity and favorability of information. Personnel Psychology, 36, 331-341.

Knouse, S.B. (1985). The letter of recommendation: Confidentiality and unfavorability of information. Proceedings of the Eastern Academy of Management, 22, 97-99.

Knouse, S.B. (1986). The letter of recommendation: Attribution and unfavorability of information. Proceedings of the Southwestern Academy of Management, 28, 154-158.

Knouse, S.B. (in press). An attribution theory approach to the letter of recommendation . International Journal of Management.

Muchinsky, P.M. (1979). The use of reference reports in personnel selection: A review and evaluation. Journal of Occupational Psychology , 52, 287-297.

Peres, S.H. & Garcia, R. (1962). Validity and dimensions of descriptive adjectives used in reference letters for engineering applicants. Personnel Psychology, 15, 279-286.

Privacy Act of 1974, 5 USCA, 552a.

Rest, S. (1976). Schedules of reinforcement: An attributional analysis . In J. H. Harvey , W. J. Ickes , and R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research, Vol. 1,Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .

Rice, J.D. (1978). Privacy legislation: Its effect on preemployment reference checking. The Personnel Administrator, 23, 46-51.

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology , Vol. 10 (pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.

Shaffer, D.R. , Mays, P.V. , & Etheridge, K. (1976). Who shall be hired: A biasing effect of the Buckley Amendment on employment practices. Journal of Applied Psychology , 61, 571-575.

Shaffer, D.R. & Tomarelli, M. (1981). Bias in the Ivory Tower: An unintended consequence of the Buckley Amendment for graduate admissions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 7-11.

Smith, P.C. (1976). Behaviors, results, and organizational effectiveness: The problem of criteria. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 745-776). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Stevens, G.E. (1978). The letter of recommendation as a privileged communication . American Business Law Journal, 16, 1-15.

Wangler, L. (1975). Employee reference request revisited. The Personnel Administrator, 60-62.

Weiner, B. , Frieze, I. , Kukla, A. , Reed, L. , Rest, S. , & Rosenbaum, R.M. (1972). Perceived causes of success and failure. In E. E. Jones , D. E. Kanouse , H. H. Kelley , R. E. Nisbett , S. Valins , & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.