This study investigates the acceptance of a prototype resume that includes candidate personality assessment information. Data were obtained from hiring managers and human resource professionals in regional chapters of the Society for Human Resource Management. Respondents found the new content useful and that the new information added value when compared with a traditional resume. This study suggests the possibility of improving the effectiveness of candidate screening and selection with the inclusion of such data in a standard resume and may be useful for instructing new business school graduates in the preparation of their professional resumes.
AmareN.ManningA. (2009). Writing for the robot: How employer search tools have influenced resume rhetoric and ethics. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 35-60.
2.
BarrickM. R.MountM. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
3.
BarrickM. R.MountM. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator between the Big Five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 111-118.
4.
BarrickM. R.ParksL.MountM. (2005). Self-monitoring as a moderator of the relationship between personality traits and performance. Personnel Psychology, 58, 745-767.
5.
BarrickM. R.PattonG. K.HauglandS. N. (2000). Accuracy of interviewer judgments of job applicant personality traits. Personnel Psychology, 53, 925-951.
6.
BrownB. K.CampionM. A. (1994). Biodata phenomenology: Recruiters’ perceptions and use of biographical information in resume screening. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 897-908.
7.
ColeM. S.FieldH. S.GilesW. F.HarrisS. G. (2009). Recruiters’ inferences of applicant personality based on resume screening: Do paper people have a personality?Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 5-18.
8.
ColeM. S.RubinR. S.FieldH. S.GilesW. F. (2007). Recruiters’ perceptions and use of applicant résumé information: Screening the recent graduate. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 319-343.
9.
ConnC. E. (2008). Integrating writing skills and ethics training in business communication pedagogy: A resume case study exemplar. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 138-151.
10.
CorbinJ. M.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3-21.
11.
DipboyeR. L.JacksonS. L. (1999). Interviewer experience and expertise effects. In EderR. W.HarrisM. M. (Eds.), The employment interview handbook (pp. 229-292). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
FaulderL. (2005, January9). The growing cult of personality tests. Edmonton Journal, p. D6.
13.
HakelM. D.DobmeyerT. W.DunnetteM. D. (1970). Relative importance of three content dimensions in overall suitability ratings of job applicants’ resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 65-71.
14.
HillmerS.HillmerB.McRobersG. (2004) The real costs of turnover: Lessons from a call center. Human Resource Planning, 27(3), 34-41.
15.
HutchinsonK.BrefkaD. (1997). Personnel administrators’ preferences for resume content: Ten years after. Business Communication Quarterly, 60(2), 67-75.
16.
KenkelC. (2005). Extreme résumé makeover: The ultimate guide to renovating your résumé (1st ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
17.
LevineE.FloryA. (1976). Training and experience evaluation: A practical handbook for evaluating job applications, resumes, and other applicant data. Tempe, AZ: Personnel Services Organization.
18.
MoodyJ.StewartB.Bolt-LeeC. (2002). Showcasing the skilled business student: Expanding the tool kit. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(1), 21-36.
19.
MoyJ. W.LamK. F. (2004). Selection criteria and the impact of personality on getting hired. Personnel Review, 33, 521-535.
20.
PannoneR. (1994). Blue collar selection. In StokesG. S.MumfordM. D.OwensW. A. (Eds.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (pp. 261-273). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
21.
PiotrowskiC.ArmstrongT. (2006). Current recruitment and selection practices: A national survey of Fortune1000 firms. North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 489-496.
22.
RothsteinM. G.GoffinR. D. (2006). The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support?Human Resource Management Review, 16, 155-180.
23.
SchulleryN. M.IckesL.SchulleryS. E. (2009). Employer preferences for résumés and cover letters. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 163-176.
24.
SmartK. L. (2004). Articulating skills in the job search: Proving by example. Business Communication Quarterly, 67, 198-205.
25.
UdechukwuI.ManyakT. (2009). Job applicants’ perceptions of resumes versus employment application forms in the recruitment process in a public organization. Public Personnel Management, 38(4), 79-96.
26.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2010). North American Industry Classification System. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/bls/naics.htm
27.
VarmaA.Soo MinT.PichlerS. (2006). Ingratiation in job applications: Impact on selection decisions. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 200-210.
