Beason, L. (2001). Ethos and error: How business people react to errors. College Composition and Communication, 53(1), 33-64.
2.
College Board, the National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges. (2004, September). Writing: A ticket to work... or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders. New York: Author. Retrieved January 6, 2006, from http://www.writingcommission.org
3.
College Board, the National Commission on Writing for America’s Families, Schools, and Colleges. (2005, July). Writing: A powerful message from state government. New York: Author.
4.
Doniger, P. (2003). Language matters: Grammar as a tool in the teaching of literature. English Journal, 92(3), 101-104.
5.
Gilsdorf, J., & Leonard, D. (2001). Big stuff, little stuff: A decennial measurement of executives’ and academics’ reactions to questionable usage elements. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 439-475.
6.
Hillocks, G., Jr., & Smith, M. W. (2003). Grammars and literacy learning. In J. Flood, J. Jensen, D. Lapp, & J. Squire (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 721-737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Hudson, R. (2001). Grammar teaching and writing skills: The research evidence. Syntax in the Schools. Retrieved March 28, 2006, from http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/dick/writing.htm
8.
Leonard, D., & Gilsdorf, J. (1990). Language in change: Academics’ and executives’ perceptions of usage errors. Journal of Business Communication, 27, 137-158.
9.
Quible, Z. (2004). Error identification, labeling, and correction. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 46(3), 155-168.
10.
Quible, Z. (2006). Impact of error labeling on error elimination in business writing. Business Communication Quarterly, 69, 8-24.
11.
Wardrope, W., & Bayless, M. (1999). Content of the business communication course: An analysis of coverage. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(4), 33-40.