To assess students’ business writing abilities upon entry into the business program and exit from the capstone course, a multitiered assessment package was developed that measures students’ achievement of specific learning outcomes and provides “value-added” scores. The online segment of the test measures five competencies across three process levels; the in-class writing segment measures the same five competencies across higher process levels. The data can then be cross-referenced for multitiered measurements. The learning outcomes are derived from the grading rubric used in the business communication classes, thus bringing classroom grading practices into assessment at the program level. The core competencies, rubric, writing prompt, and sample questions are provided. The process of designing the assessment, engaging faculty participation, and measuring outcomes are detailed.
Ashbaugh, H., Johnstone, K. M., & Warfield, T. D. (2000, May). Outcome assessment of a writing-skill improvement initiative: Results and methodological implications [Electronic version]. Issues in Accounting Education, 17(2), 123-148.
2.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International). (2005, January 1). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/business/AACSBSTANDARDS-Jan05-Final.pdf
3.
Astin, A. W., Banta, T. W., Cross, K. P., El-Khawas, E., Ewell, P. T., Hutchings, P., et al. (n.d.). Assessment: 9 principles of good practice for assessing student learning. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from AACSB’s Web site: http://www.aacsb.edu/resource_centers/assessment/9principles.asp
4.
Ball State University, Office of Academic Assessment and Institutional Research. (2002). Assessment workbook. Retrieved October 10, 2002, from Ball State University’s Web site: http://www.bsu.edu/web/assessment/WB/contents.htm
5.
Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Book 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
6.
Borrowman, S. (1999). The trinity of portfolio placement: Validity, reliability, and curriculum reform. Writing Program Administration, 23, 7-19.
7.
Broad, M. C., Campbell, W. D., Caret, R. L., Charnofsky, H., Collins, A., Dinielli, G, et al. (1997). The cornerstones report. Retrieved from the California State University Web site: http://www.calstate.edu/Cornerstones/reports/cornerstones_report/
8.
Brzovic, K., Fraser, L., Loewy, D., & Vogt, G. (2002, August). Core competencies and assessment in Business Writing: BUAD 201, 301 and 501. Poster session presented at the California State University, Fullerton, Faculty Day. Available from http://business.fullerton.edu/buswriting/CoreCompetencies.pdf
9.
California State University, Fullerton. (2004). Mission, goals and strategies. Retrieved April 14, 2004, from http://www.fullerton.edu/aboutcsuf/mission.asp
10.
California State University, Fullerton, College of Business and Economics. (2001). Mission and goals. Fullerton, CA.
11.
Crehan, K. D. (1997, October). A discussion of analytic scoring for writing performance assessments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Arizona Educational Research Association, Phoenix. Abstract retrieved October 15, 2003, from ERIC database, No. 1992-2003/09.
12.
Downie, N. M. (1967). Fundamentals of measurement: Techniques and practices (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Gilsdorf, J. (2003, November). Progress report: CSU Business Assessment Test. Paper presented to the meeting of the California State University Business Assessment Test (CSU-BAT) Task Force, Long Beach, CA.
14.
Gronlund, N. E. (1985). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (5th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
15.
Gronlund, N. E. (2003). Assessment of student achievement (7th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Harich, K., Fraser, L., & Norby, J. (in press). Taking the time to do it right: A comprehensive, value-added approach for writing skills. In K. Martell & T. Calderon (Eds.), Assessment of student learning in business schools: Vol. 1., No. 2. Assessment of student learning in business schools: Best practices each step of the way. Tallahassee, FL: Association for Institutional Research.
17.
Huot, B. (1990a). The literature of direct writing assessment: Major concerns and prevailing trends. Review of Educational Research, 60, 237-263.
18.
Huot, B. (1990b). Reliability, validity, and holistic scoring: What we know and what we need to know. College Composition and Communication, 41, 201-213.
19.
Johnson, R. L., McDaniel, F., II, & Willeke, M. J. (2000). Using portfolios in program evaluation: An investigation of interrater reliability [Electronic version]. American Journal of Evaluation, 1, 65-80.
20.
Marshall, T. A., II. (2002, October 23-26). How do we know we’re doing it right? Assessing outcomes in core business communication courses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Business Communication, Cincinnati, OH.
21.
Palomba, C. A., & Banta, T. W. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing, and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Penny, J., Johnson, R. L., & Gordon, B. (2000, May). The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability. An empirical study of a holistic rubric [Electronic version]. Assessing Writing, 2, 143-164.
23.
Pike, G. R. (1999/2001). Measurement issues in outcomes assessment. In T. Banta & Associates (Eds.), Building a scholarship of assessment (pp. 131-147). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Rogers, P. S., & Rymer, J. (2001, April). Analytical tools to facilitate transitions into new writing contexts: A communicative perspective. Journal of Business Communication, 28, 112-152.
25.
Varner, I. I., & Pomerenke, P. J. (1998). Assessing competency in business writing. [Electronic version]. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(4), 83-89.
26.
Walvoord, B. E., & Anderson, V. J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Western Association of Schools and Colleges. (2001). WASC 2001 handbook of accreditation. Retrieved June 8, 2005, from http://www.wascweb.org/senior/handbook.pdf
28.
White, E. M. (1995). An apologia for the timed impromptu essay test. College Composition and Communication, 46, 30-45.
