Student Assessment of Learning Gains (SALGains) is a Web-based instrument for measuring student perception of their learning in a variety of courses. The authors adapted this instrument to measure students’ achieved proficiency in analyzing cases in an advanced business communication class. The instrument showed that students did achieve a high level of proficiency and that they did so equally in both traditional and online classes.
American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Card, K., & Horton, L. (2000). Providing access to graduate education using computer-mediated communication. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(3), 235-245. Retrieved April 6, 2001, from OCLC Online Computer Library Center online database (Education Abstracts).
3.
Carter, M., Anson, C. M., & Miller, C. R. (2003). Assessing technical writing in institutional contexts: Using outcomes-based assessment for programmatic thinking. Technical Communication Quarterly, 12(1), 101.
4.
Hill, N. T., Perry, S. E., & Stein, D. M. (1998). Using accounting student surveys in an outcomes assessment program. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(1), 65-78.
5.
Manning, C. (2002). Improving real estate and other business courses through targeted student assessment. Journal of Real Estate Practice and Education, 5(1), 27-43.
6.
A new test for MBA wannabes? The GMAT is good at evaluating analytical skills. But what about “common sense” or right-brain skills? Enter the SIA. (2001, November 28). BusinessWeek online. Retrieved June 17, 2003, from Factiva database.
7.
O’Rourke, J. S., IV. (2004). Management communication: A case analysis approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8.
Penrose, J. M., Rasberry, R. W., & Myers, R. J. (2001). Advanced business communication (4th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
9.
Plutsky, S., & Wilson, B. A. (2001). Writing across the curriculum in a college of business and economics. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(4), 26-41.
10.
Rybacki, D., & Lattimore, D. (1999). Assessment of undergraduate and graduate programs. Public Relations Review, 25(1), 65.
11.
Study confirms: Testing MBA students for practical intelligence is effective predictor of academic and real-world success. (2001, November 7). Ascribe Newswire. Retrieved June 17, 2003, from Factiva database.
12.
Varner, I. I., & Pomerenke, P. J. (1998). Assessing competency in business writing. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(4), 83-89.
13.
Wright, V. H., Marsh, G. E., & Miller, M. T. (2000). A critical comparison of graduate student satisfaction in asynchronous and synchronous course instruction. Planning & Changing, 31(1/2), 107-118. Retrieved April 6, 2001, from OCLC Online Computer Library Center online database (Education Abstracts).
