The increased demand for Internet courses, especially in schools of business, has raised questions about instructional interaction and teacher-student immediacy, which online courses may lack. Because current research suggests immediacy behaviors may indeed be present, we developed a strategy for measuring immediacy in an online MBA course and related the results to student grades on final team projects in the course. Learner-to-learner, noncontent-related statements showed minimal affective behavior, but that lack did not have a negative effect on grades. The study suggests that students do not automatically provide supportive feedback, compliment each other, and express appreciation or agreement unless the instructor builds a learning community and transfers interactive roles to the students themselves.
American Association of University Professors. (1998). Distance learning. Academe, 84(3), 30-38.
2.
Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet-based MBA course. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(4), 9-25.
3.
Borthick, A. F., Jones, D. R., & Wakai, S. (2003). Designing learning experiences within learners’ zones of proximal development (ZPDs): Enabling collaborative learning on-site and online. Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 107-135.
4.
Brandon, D., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 109-126.
5.
Bruffee, K. A. (1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning. Change, 27, 12-19.
6.
Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
7.
Christophel, D. M., & Gorham, J. (1995). A test-retest analysis of student motivation, teacher immediacy, and perceived sources of motivation and demotivation in college classes. Communication Education, 44, 292-306.
8.
Dobos, J. A. (1996). Effects of student expectations and communication apprehension on student motivation. Communication Education, 45, 118-135.
9.
Easton, S. S. (2003a). Clarifying the instructor’s role in online distance learning. Communication Education, 52, 87-105.
10.
Easton, S. S. (2003b). Social learning online: Expectations and experiences. Florida Communication Journal, 31, 11-19.
11.
Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., & Kreps, G. L. (2000). Investigating communication: An introduction to research methods (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
Graham, M., & Scarborough, H. (2001). Enhancing the learning environment for distance education students. Distance Education, 22(2), 232-244.
13.
Grow, Gerald O. (1991/1996). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 125-149. Expanded version available from www.longleaf.net/ggrow
14.
Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
15.
Hall, D. (1997). Computer mediated communication in post-compulsory teacher education. Open Learning, 12(3), 54-56.
16.
Hartman, J., Lewis, J. S., & Powell, K. S. (2002). Inbox shock: A study of electronic message volume in a distance managerial communication course. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(3), 9-29.
17.
Heckman, R., & Annabi, H. (2002). How the teacher’s role changes in on-line case study discussions. Retrieved October, 29, 2003, from Proceedings for the Eighth Sloan-C International Conference, at www.aln.org/conference/proceedings/2002/track7.asp
18.
Johnston, V. L. (1996). Toward a global classroom using computer-mediated communications at UAA. In University of Alaska Anchorage, vocational teacher education research report. East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research in Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED356759)
19.
Kruger, L. J., & Cohen, S. (1996). Using the Internet to extend training in team problem solving. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28(2), 248-253.
20.
LaRose, R., & Whitten, P. (2000). Re-thinking instructional immediacy for Web courses: A social cognitive exploration. Communication Education, 49(4), 320-338.
21.
Lorenzo, G., & Moore, J. (2002). The Sloan Consortium report to the nation: Five pillars of quality online education. Retrieved May 24, 2004, from the invitational workshop held in LakeGeorge, NY, on September 26-28, 2002, at http://www.aln.org/effective/pillarreport1.pdf
22.
Lundberg, C. A. (2003). Nontraditional college students and the role of collaborative learning as a tool for science mastery. School of Science and Mathematics, 103(1), 8-18.
23.
McFadzean, E. (2001). Supporting virtual learning groups. Part 1: A pedagogical perspective. Team Performance Management, 7, 53-63.
24.
Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
25.
Meyer, K. A. (2002). Quality in distance education, focus on on-line learning (AHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 29, No. 4, A. J. Kezar, Series Ed.). San Fransico, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Moore, A., Masterson, J. T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instructions. Communication Education, 45, 29-39.
27.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
28.
Qing, L. (2002). Exploration of collaborative learning and communication in an educational environment using computer-mediated communication. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 503-517.
29.
Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). Nonverbal behavior in human relations (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
Swan, K., & Richardson, J. C. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 68-82.
31.
Symons, J. (1996). What type of learning? A review of learning approaches in the context of the design and delivery of academic management development programmes in the UK (Working Paper No. 9623). Henley-on-Thames, UK: Henley Management College.
32.
Uribe, D., Klein, J., & Sullivan, H. (2003). Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51(1), 5-20.
33.
Wardrope, W. (2001). A communication-based response to distance learning in business communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(2), 92-97.
34.
Wiener, M., & Mehrabian, A. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
