Two Approaches to Using Client Projects in the College Classroom

Abstract

Client projects are an opportunity for universities to create long-lasting, mutually beneficial relationships with businesses through an academic consultancy service. This article discusses the rationale and logistics of two models for conducting such projects. One model, used at Clemson University, is a formal academic consultancy service in which students are paid for their work with for-profit businesses. Another, used at the University of North Texas, also incorporates for-profit clients but operates in the more traditional classroom setting where student teams are not paid for their work. Whatever the approach, client projects facilitate communication between academia and business, enlist the services of professionals in a variety of fields to help shape the education of future graduates, offer opportunities for students to gain practical experience that surpasses any classroom simulation or case study, and keep instructors in touch with business trends and practices.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (Eds.). (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Blakeslee, A. M. (2001). Bridging workplace and the academy: Teaching professional genres through classroom-workplace collaborations. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(2), 169-193.

Bush-Bacelis, J. L. (1998). Innovative pedagogy: Academic service-learning for business communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(3), 20-34.

Coture, B., Goldstein, J. R., & Brockmann, R. J. (1985). Cases as communication problems for writers: How do they differ? In R. J. Brockmann (Ed.), The case method in technical communication (pp. 107-123). Lubbock, TX: Association of Teachers of Technical Writing.

Dorn, E.M. (1999). Case method instruction in the business writing classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 62(1), 41-63.

Forman, J., & Rymer, J. (1999). The genre system of the Harvard case method. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13(4), 373-400.

Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. (1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genres. Written Communication, 11, 193-226.

Garay, M. S. (1995). Meeting workplace needs in an introductory business writing course: A tale of classroom corporation and a “boss” instructor. Business Communication Quarterly, 58(1), 35-41.

Kingsley, L. (1982). The case method as a form of communication. Journal of Business Communication, 19(2), 39-50.

10.

Matthews, C., & Zimmerman, B. (1999). Integrating service learning and technical communication: Benefits and challenges. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, 383-405.

11.

McEachern, R. W. (2001). Problems in service learning and technical/professional writing: Incorporating the perspective on nonprofit management. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(2), 211-225.

12.

Muir, C. (1996). Using consulting projects to teach critical-thinking skills in business communication. Business Communication Quarterly, 59(4), 77-87.

13.

North, A. B., & Worth, W. E. (1997). Workplace competencies: Trends in advertised entry-level technology, interpersonal, and basic communication job skills, 1992-1995. Office Systems Research Journal, 15, 1-6.

14.

Rozumalski, L. P., & Graves, M. F. (1995). Effects of case and traditional writing assignments on writing products and processes. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9(1), 77-102.

15.

Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills. (1992). What work requires of schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.

16.

Tucker, M., McCarthy, A., Hoxmeier, J., & Lenk, M. (1998). Community service learning increases communication skills and across the business curriculum. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(2), 88-100.

17.

Wickliff, G. (1989). The case of the real group project. In R. Louth & A. M. Scott (Eds.), Collaborative technical writing: Theory and practice (pp. 31-39). Hammond, LA: ATTW.